Category Archives: BC Politics

#VanPoli | COPE | Restoring Funding to the Vancouver Public Library

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Chloe Leslie (@intheknow_withchlo)

Vancouver’s Libraries Are Closing.
Ken Sim and ABC Vancouver Had Money for FIFA. Enough Said.

Want to know what Ken Sim’s ABC Vancouver administration thinks is essential? Look at what it is willing to spend money on — and what it is willing to let disappear.

For FIFA, there was $13.4 million.

For hospitality packages, suites and lounges surrounding the 2026 World Cup, Vancouver City Hall found the money. The City says the packages were purchased as assets that could be resold to offset World Cup costs. Fine. Let’s accept that explanation.

But ask Ken Sim’s administration to keep neighbourhood libraries open seven days a week and suddenly we are talking about budgets, constraints and difficult choices.

Apparently, in ABC Vancouver’s vision of a world-class city, FIFA deserves a suite while Vancouver’s children can wait outside the library on Monday.

That isn’t a budgetary footnote.

It is a statement of priorities.

And Vancouver voters should remember it come voting day October 17, 2026.

Ten Vancouver Public Library branches are closed on Mondays.

Other branches have reduced hours. The Vancouver Public Library Board has made clear that restoring Monday service would require additional funding, and COPE Councillor Sean Orr has repeatedly pushed City Council to restore the lost hours and move toward seven-day-a-week library service.

Orr calls libraries “vital community hubs.”

He is right.

In fact, he may be understating their importance.

A public library is one of the few places left in Vancouver where you can walk through a door without being expected to spend money.

Think about that.

Vancouver is increasingly a city of private spaces. Coffee shops want you to buy coffee. Restaurants want you to buy food. Entertainment venues want your admission fee. Commercial workspaces want your membership.

The public library wants nothing from you except that you come in.

You can read.

You can study.

You can use a computer.

You can access the Internet.

You can borrow books.

You can attend a programme.

You can bring your child to story time.

You can sit quietly.

And you don’t have to buy anything.

That is what public means.

For young families, libraries are an essential piece of the social infrastructure of a city.

Children’s story time at the Britannia Public Library on Vancouver’s east side

In a city where housing, childcare, food and virtually every form of recreation are becoming more expensive, the library offers parents something increasingly rare: a place where their children can learn, play and discover without another bill arriving at the end.

For children growing up in small apartments, the library can provide something their homes cannot — space to read, study and concentrate.

For teenagers, it can be a safe place after school.

For students, it can be a quiet place to work.

For newcomers, it can be a gateway to language learning, information and civic life.

And for seniors, the library can be much more than a place to borrow books.

It can be a place to go.

A place to meet people.

A place to use technology.

A place to read newspapers.

A place to participate in community life.

For an isolated senior, that can be enormously important.

And yet this is the public service Ken Sim & ABC have allowed to become less accessible.

COPE Council candidate Chloe Leslie has argued that Vancouver must be a city that works for ordinary residents rather than simply for those who can afford it.

The library debate is a perfect illustration of that principle.

Because when you reduce library hours, you don’t inconvenience everyone equally.

A wealthy professional with a home office, high-speed internet, a private collection of books and the ability to drive across the city can shrug.

A single parent working irregular hours cannot.

A senior without a car cannot.

A teenager whose home isn’t conducive to studying cannot.

A newcomer without reliable internet cannot.

A person experiencing poverty cannot.

Cuts to public services are never merely cuts. They determine who gets access.

And that’s why the FIFA comparison matters.

This is not about suggesting that the City literally handed Ken Sim’s friends $13.4 million in tickets. It didn’t. The World Cup expenditure involved hospitality packages purchased through the tournament’s official hospitality provider, with the intention of recovering costs through resale.

But that doesn’t change the fundamental political question.

When ABC wants something badly enough, the money appears.

When the administration wants Vancouver to shine on the international stage, millions can be committed.

But when residents ask for the doors of their neighbourhood libraries to remain open?

Suddenly there are constraints.

Apparently Vancouver can afford to host the world.

It just can’t afford to keep the library open on Monday.

That is not leadership.

It is a question of priorities.

And it is a question Vancouver voters should answer this fall.

Mayor Ken Sim has repeatedly presented himself as the Mayor of a modern, ambitious, internationally recognized Vancouver.

Wonderful.

But a world-class city isn’t defined by FIFA hospitality suites.

It is defined by the quality of life of the people who live there.

A genuinely world-class city makes sure a child can access a book regardless of family income.

It makes sure seniors have places to gather.

It makes sure newcomers can learn.

It makes sure students can study.

It protects public spaces where people aren’t required to consume.

And it keeps those spaces open when people actually need them.

Seven days a week.

Sean Orr has put that principle before City Council.

Chloe Leslie has made equitable public services part of her campaign.

Now every candidate seeking a seat at City Hall should be asked the same question:

Will you vote to restore Vancouver’s lost library hours and make seven-day-a-week service the standard across the city?

No slogans.

No vague promises.

No “when finances improve.”

Yes or no.

Because the library is not a luxury.

It is one of the foundations of a civilized city.

And on October 17, Vancouver voters will have an opportunity to decide whether Ken Sim and ABC Vancouver’s priorities reflect the city they want to live in.

If you believe Vancouver should be a city where public institutions are strengthened rather than diminished, where children and seniors matter as much as FIFA, where public space remains public and where access to knowledge isn’t determined by your income, then the choice is clear.

Vancouver doesn’t need another four years of ABC’s version of “world-class.”

It needs a City Hall that understands the meaning of the word public.

On October 17, vote ABC Vancouver out.

And then open the library doors.

Seven days a week.

#VanPoli | The Election is Over | Meet Vancouver’s Next Mayor: Kareem Allam

There are moments in the political life of a city when an election becomes about more than choosing a Mayor.

October 17, 2026, is one of those moments.

Vancouver is not simply deciding whether to give Ken Sim and ABC Vancouver another four years. Vancouver is deciding what kind of city it wants to become — and, more importantly, who the city is actually going to work for.

For the past four years, City Hall has too often appeared preoccupied with grand announcements, expensive projects, political theatre and the interests of the well-connected while the everyday infrastructure of neighbourhood life has deteriorated.

Libraries have faced cuts. Community facilities are aging. Swimming pools are disappearing. Parking meters have appeared around community amenities. Families are struggling with the cost of living. Seniors are wondering where affordable recreation opportunities are going to come from. Young people increasingly question whether they can afford to remain in the city in which they grew up.

Kareem Allam, Vancouver Liberals | The next Mayor of Vancouver

Into that vacuum comes Kareem Allam and the Vancouver Liberals.

There  is a compelling case to be made that Kareem Allam could become Vancouver’s most progressive Mayor in more than half a century.

Not because he comes from the traditional left.

Not because he comes from the traditional right.

But precisely because he doesn’t fit neatly into either category.

Kareem Allam’s political proposition is something Vancouver has desperately needed: a government organized around people rather than ideology.

The Vancouver Liberals’ stated goal is refreshingly straightforward: create a Vancouver where young people can stay, work, build a career and raise a family. Their platform combines affordability, public investment, stronger frontline services, parks and recreation, public safety, accountability and neighbourhood infrastructure.

That is progressive municipal government in its most practical form.

Kareem Allam: The Vancouver Mayor Who Will Get To Work on Day One

For Vancouver voters looking for a Mayor who can begin governing on the morning after the 2026 civic election, rather than spending the first year learning how City Hall works, Kareem Allam presents a compelling case.

The Vancouver Liberals’ Mayoral candidate is not simply a political newcomer with an attractive platform. He is a lifelong Vancouverite who has spent more than 25 years working in and around municipal, provincial and federal government, public policy, Indigenous relations, health care, transportation and infrastructure.

Kareem’s career has given him something that is extraordinarily rare among candidates for municipal office: an understanding of government not merely from the outside, but from inside the machinery of government itself.

Kareem Allam is not entering Vancouver’s 2026 Mayoral race as a political novice. Far from it. Kareem has worked for elected politicians, inside government, in public institutions, on political campaigns and, critically, inside Vancouver’s Mayor’s office itself.

There is no other Mayoral candidate in 2026 who can match his breadth of experience.

Over his 25-year professional life, Kareem Allam has worked in government relations and public affairs, holding positions involving consequential policy areas facing British Columbia: energy, health care, transportation, infrastructure and Indigenous relations.

Kareem Allam worked with the Fraser Health Authority. He served on public and advisory boards. He became Director of Public Policy at the Vancouver Board of Trade. He developed extensive relationships with First Nations and worked on Indigenous economic-development issues.

Vancouver Magazine placed Kareem Allam among British Columbia’s 50 most powerful people, recognizing him as one of the province’s most sought-after political minds.

A Mayor must understand municipal bureaucracy, the Vancouver Charter, budgeting, procurement, zoning, permitting, capital budgets, collective agreements, infrastructure financing, development approvals, labour relations, intergovernmental negotiations, civic infrastructure, regional government, provincial jurisdiction and the relationship between elected officials and the professional bureaucracy.

Kareem Allam has spent his entire professional career learning precisely those systems.

Indeed, it is difficult to identify another 2026 Mayoral candidate who has worked so extensively across the federal, provincial and municipal spheres while also gaining experience inside Vancouver’s own Mayoral office. His career has included government-relations positions, senior policy work, public boards and direct municipal executive experience. He has served on the TransLink screening panel, and other public and advisory bodies. He currently serves on advisory bodies associated with the University of Victoria and Kwantlen Polytechnic University.

The Mayor of the City of Vanncouver has to interact with Metro Vancouver.

With TransLink.

With the provincial government.

With Ottawa.

With developers.

With unions.

With neighbourhoods.

With First Nations.

With a bureaucracy employing thousands of people.

And then the Mayor has to get 10 Councillors to agree on what should actually happen.

This is not theory. It is governing.

And Kareem Allam has spent decades learning how to do it.

Kareem Allam’s political career is unusual because he has worked across ideological and partisan boundaries. Conservatives, Liberals, New Democrats, civic politicians, business leaders, public servants and Indigenous governments have all been part of his professional world.

It means Kareem Allam understands that government is not about finding people who agree with you.

It is about finding a way to get things done among people who don’t.

Former B.C. cabinet minister Michelle Mungall has joined his campaign as an honourary co-chair, while Arminder Randhawa, a former B.C. NDP executive member and former Vancouver Board of Variance member, has described Kareem Allam as a thoughtful and pragmatic leader who brings people together.

Those are precisely the qualities Vancouver should be looking for.

Vancouver doesn’t need a Mayor who believes governing means announcing initiatives.

Vancouver needs a Mayor who understands implementation.

Consider housing.

Kareem Allam’s approach is revealing. Rather than simply promising to build more housing, he has focused on the regulatory machinery that determines whether housing actually gets built — including municipal permitting, building codes and bureaucratic duplication.

That is the language of someone who understands government.

The problem isn’t always that government doesn’t know what Vancouver needs.

The problem is that government often makes it extraordinarily difficult to deliver it.

Kareem Allam knows where the levers are.

He knows which government controls which lever.

He knows who has to be at the table.

And, having spent years dealing with senior governments, he knows how to pick up the telephone and get the right people on the other end.

Imagine a Mayor walking into City Hall on the first day of his administration already familiar with the bureaucracy, already understanding municipal government, already possessing relationships with provincial and federal officials, already knowing the political terrain and already having spent time inside the Mayor’s office.

That is a fundamentally different proposition from electing someone who will spend the first year learning the job.

The choice facing Vancouver voters is larger than a choice between political parties.

It is a choice between experience and apprenticeship.

Between knowing what government should do and knowing how to get things done.

Between another four years of political theatre and the possibility of a Mayor who can walk into the Mayor’s office on Day One and immediately begin governing.

Vancouver voters can rest assured that Kareem Allam understands the machinery required to turn an idea into policy, policy into a decision, and a decision into something residents can actually see, touch and use.

After the experience of the past four years, that distinction should matter enormously.

Kareem Allam may not be the loudest candidate in the 2026 Vancouver Mayoral race.

He may not be the candidate with the largest political organization.

But he may very well be the best-informed.

And when the doors of City Hall open on the morning after October 17, Vancouver doesn’t need another Mayor learning how to govern.

We need someone who already knows how.

An Affordability Agenda That Actually Reaches People’s Daily Lives

Of all the Mayoral campaigns seeking Vancouver’s vote, Kareem Allam and the Vancouver Liberals have put forward one of the most comprehensive affordability agendas.

Consider something as mundane — and as revealing — as parking.

The Vancouver Liberals would remove parking meters in front of beaches and community centres throughout Vancouver within their first year in office.

That may sound like a small issue.

It isn’t.

For a senior taking a child to a community centre, a parent bringing children to a neighbourhood programme, a family visiting the beach, or someone using a recreation facility because they cannot afford a private gym, another municipal fee can be the difference between participating and staying home.

Public spaces should actually feel public.

Vancouver’s parks and beaches are, for hundreds of thousands of residents, the closest thing they have to a backyard. They are playgrounds, fitness centres, meeting places, swimming areas, outdoor classrooms and places of refuge.

They should not be treated as revenue opportunities.

That philosophy runs through the Vancouver Liberals agenda.

Kareem Allam and the Vancouver Liberals are proposing an historic $1.35 billion investment in parks, recreation, pools and community infrastructure, accompanied by 400 new unionized frontline workers. The party explicitly argues that investing in parks, libraries and community spaces is part of creating safer neighbourhoods.

This is an important departure from the simplistic notion that public safety begins and ends with policing.

Of course Vancouver needs police.

But a child who has a safe place to play, a teenager who has somewhere to go after school, a senior who has an affordable fitness programme, a family with a functioning community and recreation centre nearby, and a neighbourhood with a well-maintained park with facilities in the park are all components of a safer city.

Community infrastructure is crime prevention infrastructure.

Fix The Community Centres — And Stop Governing Through Neglect

The Auditor General has already identified a serious problem.

A 2025 audit by Vancouver’s auditor general, Mike Macdonnell, found that Vancouver’s 46 recreation facilities face an infrastructure funding deficit of approximately $33 million a year, with many building systems already extended beyond their intended useful life.

That is not an abstract accounting problem.

It is what happens when a city delays maintenance until maintenance becomes reconstruction.

Kareem Allam understands this.

The Vancouver Liberals are proposing major investment in community centres, pools and parks rather than allowing these facilities to continue deteriorating. Kareem Allam has argued that failing to invest in capital infrastructure actually drives up operating costs because aging buildings become more expensive to maintain.

That is precisely the kind of municipal economics Vancouver needs.

Spend money where it makes people’s lives better.

Repair what is broken.

Build what communities need.

And stop confusing expensive government with effective government.

Vancouver Needs Community Pools — Not Smaller Ambitions

Perhaps nowhere is the difference between the Vancouver Liberals vision and the ABC vision more obvious than swimming pools.

The Vancouver Liberals have committed to a 50-metre pool, rather than accepting a 25-metre replacement for the Vancouver Aquatic Centre. Their platform argues that Vancouver already has among the lowest levels of public swimming-pool provision per capita in Canada.

Why should Vancouver settle for less?

A city of more than 600,000 people should be building recreation infrastructure for the next generation, not shrinking its ambitions to fit yesterday’s budget.

Kareem Allam’s agenda also envisions additional neighbourhood pools and water facilities, including a long-overdue community pool in Mount Pleasant.

This is what a “programme for the people” actually looks like.

It looks like children learning to swim.

It looks like seniors exercising.

It looks like families having somewhere affordable to spend an afternoon.

It looks like hockey rinks, libraries, community centres and parks that are maintained, accessible and welcoming.

It looks remarkably like the kind of people-centred municipal agenda that New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani has brought to the international political conversation.

Save the Park Board, Restore the Park Board, Fund the Park Board

The Vancouver Liberals unapologetically defend Vancouver’s elected Park Board.

They argue that Vancouver needs a strong, independent and properly funded Park Board — not its elimination.

That is about more than institutional nostalgia.

The Park Board represents an important democratic principle: Vancouver’s parks belong to Vancouverites.

Restoring stable funding for parks and recreation means acknowledging that these services are not luxuries.

They are municipal necessities.

And the $1.35-billion Vancouver Liberals commitment would give the city an opportunity to address the accumulated infrastructure deficit while creating better parks, pools, community centres and recreational opportunities across all 23 neighbourhoods.

Finish What Vancouver Civic Governments Have Already Promised

A re-imagined Marpole Community Centre approved in a 2008 Capital Expenditure referendum. Not complete more than 18 years later. Only the Vancouver Liberals will complete the project.

There is another essential principle here: if government makes a commitment to a neighbourhood, government should keep it.

The long-planned renewal of the Marpole Community Centre is finally under construction, with completion expected early to mid 2027. The project will provide a renewed centre, childcare, a field house and new outdoor amenities.

But Vancouver’s broader history is filled with promises that have taken far too long to become reality.

A Vancouver Liberals administration would adopt a rule:

No more indefinite delays.

Where projects have been approved, promised or negotiated — as they were when voters went to the polls to approve the proposed Capital Expenditure budget, in 2008, 2011, 2014, 2018 and 2022 — residents deserve a clear timetable, transparent financing and a government prepared to get the work done.

That includes ensuring that the community amenities associated with major developments actually materialize.

At Oakridge Park, QuadReal and Westbank are responsible for a major redevelopment that includes a community centre, library, performance area and childcare.

At River District, Wesgroup’s long-term plan includes a community centre as an important public amenity.

A government led by Kareem Allam would insist developers honour those commitments.

That is not anti-development.

It is pro-community development.

Food Security is Affordability, and Necessary in the City of Vancouver

Perhaps one of the most innovative elements of the Vancouver Liberals agenda is the proposed Food Hub Programme.

As VanRamblings has previously reported, Kareem Allam’s food-security vision draws inspiration from the University of British Columbia’s Community Food Hub, where the Food Hub Market operates as a not-for-profit community space offering affordable groceries and culturally diverse foods.

The concept is deceptively simple.

Use public resources and partnerships to make nutritious food more affordable.

Create neighbourhood-based food hubs.

Connect residents with community organizations.

Make food security part of a civic affordability policy rather than treating hunger exclusively as a charitable problem.

That matters because food insecurity is not confined to people without jobs.

It increasingly affects working families, students, seniors and people whose incomes simply cannot keep pace with Vancouver’s extraordinary cost of living.

Food security is affordability.

And affordability is the defining municipal issue of 2026.

A Vancouver Liberal Commitment: Taxes People Can Actually Afford 

Kareem Allam has committed to limiting annual property-tax increases 3.8%, or less, per year.

That is an important commitment because Vancouver citizens deserve predictability.

Under Ken Sim’s ABC Vancouver, the Vancouver Liberals point out, property taxes have risen by 23.3%. Kareem Allam has argued that the city’s budget grew from approximately $1.7 billion when Sim inherited it to approximately $2.4 billion, without a corresponding improvement in frontline services.

The question Vancouver voters should be asking is simple:

If taxes keep rising, where is the improvement in our daily lives?

Kareem Allam’s answer is to redirect spending toward frontline workers and core services.

Four hundred new frontline employees.

Better garbage collection.

Better road maintenance.

Better parks.

Better recreation facilities.

Better basic services.

No property taxes levied on medical centres.

Fewer managers and more people doing the work Vancouverites pay City Hall to do.

That is not austerity.

It is prioritization.

A City Hall That Isn’t Afraid of But Actually Welcomes the Public

A progressive government must also be a transparent government.

The Vancouver Liberals have proposed cheaper public access to government records, a stronger Integrity Commissioner and greater accountability at City Hall.

That should include reducing or eliminating Freedom of Information fees for journalists and members of the public wherever possible.

Government records belong to the public.

Journalists should not have to fight City Hall to discover what City Hall is doing.

And citizens should not have to pay excessive fees to learn how their own government spends their money.

Transparency isn’t an administrative courtesy.

It is democracy.

Even The Rats Living in Our Neighbourhoods Are Telling us Something

And then there is the rat problem.

Yes, the rat problem.

The Vancouver Liberals have made tackling Vancouver’s growing rodent infestation a public-health priority, proposing a blue-ribbon panel of experts to develop a comprehensive strategy.

It might sound almost comical.

It isn’t.

A city that cannot keep its streets, parks and public spaces clean and safe cannot call itself well governed.

The rat problem is about sanitation, waste management, infrastructure, construction practices and public health.

Sometimes the most progressive thing government can do is simply do the basics properly.

The Remarkable Coalition Allam’s Vancouver Liberals Have Built

Perhaps the strongest argument for Kareem Allam is not simply his platform.

It is the coalition he has built.

The Vancouver Liberals are attempting something Vancouver civic politics has rarely seen: bringing together people from dramatically different political traditions around a shared municipal agenda.

Their candidates include people with labour and NDP backgrounds, progressive activists, businesspeople, academics, former BC Liberals and former Conservatives.

Jessica Walton, for example, brings years of feminist, environmental, labour and political activism to the campaign, along with experience as a BCGEU shop steward and frontline government worker.

John Coupar brings 11 years of Park Board experience and a long record of advocacy for Vancouver’s parks and cultural institutions.

And the coalition continues to expand.

On August 27, former BC NDP cabinet minister Michelle Mungall and former BC NDP executive member Arminder Randhawa were announced as honorary co-chairs of the campaign. Ms. Mungall served as B.C.’s Minister of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources under John Horgan, while Ms. Randhawa has extensive experience in municipal politics and advocacy concerning intimate-partner violence, policing and women’s and children’s safety.

Their presence says something important.

This isn’t simply another ideological faction fighting another ideological faction.

It is an attempt to build a unity government for Vancouver.

As Ms. Mungall put it, she was impressed by Kareem Allam’s emphasis on frontline workers and by the work ethic of the candidates.

Ms. Randhawa described Mr. Allam as a pragmatic leader who brings people together.

And that may be precisely what Vancouver needs.

A Municipal Government of Civic Reconciliation and Unity

Vancouver is an extraordinarily diverse city.

Vancouver Liberal Armor Valor of Filipino descent running for a seat on City Council

The 2021 Census counted 38,605 Filipino residents in the City of Vancouver alone, while Filipino Canadians represented the third-largest racialized group in the Vancouver census metropolitan area.

That diversity deserves political representation.

But reconciliation also means something larger than ethnicity.

It means reconciling competing political traditions.

Labour and business.

Progressives and conservatives.

Social democrats and Liberals.

Immigrants and people whose families have lived here for generations.

Young people and seniors.

Renters and homeowners.

Downtown residents and suburban neighbourhoods.

People who disagree profoundly about politics but agree that Vancouver should be affordable, safe, clean, vibrant and welcoming.

That is the Vancouver Liberals experiment.

And it is a worthwhile experiment.

Why Kareem Allam Needs a Majority at Vancouver City Hall

But there is a final point Vancouver voters need to understand.

Electing Kareem Allam as Mayor will not be enough.

If Vancouver wants the programme described above — the pools, community centres, parks, food hubs, frontline workers, public-space investments, tax discipline, transparency reforms and neighbourhood improvements — Kareem Allam needs Councillors and Park Board Commissioners who share that agenda.

A Mayor Kareem Allam cannot govern alone.

A Mayor Kareem Allam needs a Council capable of passing budgets.

A Mayor Kareem Allam needs Park Board Commissioners committed to rebuilding Vancouver’s recreation system.

A Mayor Kareem Allam needs School Board trustees who understand the needs of families and children.

And a Mayor Kareem Allam needs a political team capable of turning campaign promises into municipal policy.

That is why Vancouver needs to elect a majority Vancouver Liberal civic administration on October 17.

This is not about giving Kareem Allam a blank cheque.

Quite the opposite.

It is about giving Vancouver voters the opportunity to hold an entire governing team accountable for a coherent programme.

For too long, Vancouver has been governed through fragmented politics, institutional conflict and competing agendas.

Kareem Allam is offering something different.

A plan.

A team.

A coalition.

And, most importantly, a willingness to govern.

Vancouver’s Choice: Vote Kareem Allam and the Vancouver Liberals

The choice facing Vancouver on October 17 could hardly be clearer.

One path leads back to four more years of the politics and priorities of the past four years.

The other asks Vancouver to try something fundamentally different.

A city where parks are treated as public assets rather than revenue opportunities.

A city where libraries are strengthened rather than diminished.

A city where community centres are repaired before they become catastrophes.

A city where children have swimming pools.

A city where seniors have affordable recreation.

A city where families can buy groceries without being pushed to the edge.

A city where property taxes are predictable.

A city where developers are required to deliver the amenities they promised.

A city where City Hall welcomes scrutiny rather than resists it.

A city where public safety means police, yes — but also clean streets, functioning neighbourhoods, recreation, mental-health services, public spaces and communities in which people actually know one another.

A city where government works for the people who live here.

That is why Kareem Allam represents something larger than another Mayoral candidacy.

Kareem Allam represents the possibility of a progressive, pragmatic, people-first government that breaks with the politics of the past half-century.

The Vancouver Liberals are not perfect. No political party is.

But in 2026, they have something increasingly rare in municipal politics:

An Action Plan That Will Transform Vancouver Into a Livable City

And on October 17, Vancouver voters have an opportunity to put that plan into action.

If Vancouver wants the change we so desperately need, we cannot settle for changing the Mayor while leaving the political machinery of City Hall essentially unchanged.

Vancouver needs a government capable of delivering.

We need a government willing to invest in people.

We need a government willing to listen.

We need a government willing to cross partisan boundaries rather than deepen them.

We need a government that believes public spaces belong to the public.

We need a government that understands that affordability is not a slogan but something measured in grocery bills, parking fees, property taxes, recreation fees and whether a family can afford to stay in the city it calls home.

And above all, Vancouver needs a Mayor who understands that government exists to serve the public — not the other way around.

That Mayor of Vancouver, in 2026, should and must be Kareem Allam.

And the government he needs with him is a majority Vancouver Liberal administration.

October 17 is Vancouver’s opportunity to choose a different future.

Vote for Kareem Allam.

Vote Vancouver Liberal. And give Vancouver the government we have all been waiting for.

#VanPoli | COPE Candidate for Mayor, Stephanie Allen, Withdraws from Race to Become City’s Next Mayor

Full text of COPE’s candidate for Mayor Stephanie Allen’s speech to a press conference delivered Sept. 2nd in Helen Gutteridge Plaza at Vancouver City Hall.

Good morning,

I offer my acknowledgement of the unceded territory of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh First Nations, to their peoples who have stewarded these lands for 1000s of years. I offer my commitment to working in good relations towards our collective liberation from colonial systems.

Today, I am here together with my colleagues and loved ones to announce that, for the good of all people living in Vancouver, we have decided as a team to withdraw my candidacy for Mayor of Vancouver.

In May, our membership nominated me as part of a slate to win the City — to evict Ken Sim and ABC and achieve a COPE-led democratic socialist municipal government.

For now, we have not been able to achieve all of our goals.

But this movement isn’t about me or about COPE.

It’s about the people of Vancouver.

And the people need us to defeat this right-wing government and reduce the harm being done by the sociopathic system we’re up against.

So while I am announcing the end of my campaign for Mayor, I am also here today to recommit to our common fight for Vancouver.

Ken Sim and ABC must be evicted on October 17th.

That’s why I am strongly encouraging the other mMayoral candidates in the race to also do the right thing, show integrity, and narrow the Mayoral field to the person best positioned to evict Ken Sim.

Earlier this year, COPE and progressive parties struck an agreement to limit candidates and create a path towards a single Mayor. We have come to the moment where we at COPE have made our decision.

It has been the privilege of a lifetime to stand as the Mayoral candidate for COPE, a party with the deepest history of fighting the power of the super rich and showing up for the poor and working class people in our city.

COPE is a party dedicated to telling the truth. We are a diverse cohort of shared purpose. We have the lived experience, academic accomplishments, systemic analysis, and practical knowledge to examine the problems facing our city at the root cause level and to craft policies that will create lasting solutions.

But just as importantly, we at COPE have the love to care about the struggles that families, seniors, youth, working people and ALL those who have been pushed to the margins are going through, and we can see how much worse it’s getting for everyone.

We will not put our egos ahead of doing the right thing for Vancouver.

We know that it is mission critical to have one Mayor on the progressive side and that it has to be the person best positioned at this critical hour, to win the election.

We need a majority progressive Council, School Board, and Park Board to undo the damage done by this bad Mayor and the bad Mayors that came before him.

By stepping aside, we are showing to the people of Vancouver that we have heard you, that we will put you first, and that our commitment is to the long haul. Our movement will keep going, we will never give up the fight for a free and just society grounded in principles of care and community over greed and inequality.

Vancouver, we are here to do the right thing for you and we will keep doing the right thing. Getting a progressive majority on Council will have a direct positive material impact on the lives of people in our city.

And while we do that vital harm reduction through our existing electoral systems, we will stay relentless in dreaming up replacement systems. Ones that are restorative of people and planet, not extractive and exploitative. Ones that value life over profit, care over consumption, and healing over abuse and punishment.

The super-rich are planning our extinction. It’s obvious now. They don’t care about us, about the future generations to come, the climate, wildlife and natural habitat. All they see are ways to squeeze humanity and nature for the sake of piling more billions into their vaults.

You take care of your neighbours. It’s been an honour to speak to so many people over these last months who understand the threat facing our city, and our world. You have shared with me your stories, your frustrations, and your dreams of better.

Local shopkeepers, non-profit leaders, co-op housing members, people working in the gig economy, those who have and are being displaced from homes they love, advocates and organizers.

YOU are the ones with the solutions.

You have done the work to get food to the households that need it, help people recover from addictions and get the therapeutic support they need.

You are the ones who put in all the work to develop affordable homes, protect women and children fleeing violence, and care for seniors on low incomes. You make sure kids are protected from the cruelty in our society.

You also make this city cool with your dedication to the arts and culture scene in this city, with comedy festivals, activating parks and event venues with live music, theatre, and visual arts productions.

It is we, the people, who have the power. We always have, and we always will. Promise me, you’ll never lose sight of that.

So, as I leave the Mayoral race I want to say:

To Vancouver, you are worth fighting for … and this building, City Hall, is your house. Do not vote for anyone who would disrespect you or take you for granted in your house. Send ABC a message that their politics of division and selling out to the super rich are done.

To my fellow candidates, and the COPE staff, volunteers, and membership, thank you for the trust you put in me to carry our message to the city.

For your dedication to a better world, and for showing up everyday challenging yourselves and all of us to dream of a better future for our city. Despite all the things, I have never served alongside a better group of people anywhere. We’re in this now, I’m not going anywhere, we still got this ‘cuz we got each other.

To my friends and supporters, my family, my husband …  thank you for being there with your calls, texts, donations, hugs, so many hugs …and showing up when I didn’t expect you but absolutely needed you. Doing this work was only possible because of your love and care.

To our ancestors, all those who came before us and fought for us to have the freedoms we have now, freedoms you never saw, thank you for what you sacrificed and for dreaming of a better world for us.

To the future generations, we won’t let you down. We will stop climate change, eliminate poverty and homelessness, and make love and compassion the foundation of the structures that govern our lives.

In solidarity, and dedication to an affordable and just city and for a better world, I offer my sincere appreciation and love.

Cruelty vs. Kindness: The Moral Choice at the Heart of Vancouver Civic Politics

Politics is often described as a contest for power: elections are won, governments formed, policies imposed and opponents defeated.

But beneath all the arguments about taxes, housing, policing, healthcare and the economy lies a more fundamental question — what kind of society do we want to create, and how do we treat one another while creating it?

That question has become increasingly urgent.

In an era when political discourse is dominated by divisiveness, hostility, anger and polarization, kindness can seem almost quaint. In the rough-and-tumble world of modern politics, kindness is sometimes dismissed as weakness, naiveté or an unwillingness to confront difficult realities.

But perhaps we have the question backwards.

If the foundational purpose of politics is the organization of society for the common good, then kindness is not an indulgence. It is a practical and necessary political value. It asks a fundamental question of every government and every politician: What kind of society are we trying to create, how do we treat people who have the least power within it?

Cruelty and kindness are two opposing choices in human behaviour.

Under King Sim The-Not-So-Great, A Culture of Cruelty Has Reigned

There is at the heart of the Sim administration a Trump-like adherence to cruelty as the defining force of Vancouver’s approach to governance, since Sim and his ABC Vancouver administration first took office in November 2022.

As a first order of business, Ken Sim revoked the Livable Wage Programme requiring suppliers to the City to pay a livable wage to their workers. Next, ABC Vancouver cancelled the Renter’s Office, as if renters didn’t matter, promising to re-direct funds to a renter’s group in Vancouver — of course, that never came to pass.

Next, Ken Sim filed two formal complaints against OneCity Vancouver City Councillor Christine Boyle, requiring her to expend funds to defend herself against the baseless charges alleged by the Mayor. Next, while practicing the Politics of Cruelty, Ken Sim and fellow ABC Councillor Lenny Zhou alleged publicly in the Chinese media that opposition COPE Councillor Sean Orr had distributed illegal drugs on the DTES over Christmas 2024 — while, in point of fact, Councillor Orr was visiting friends and family on the Sunshine Coast.

Not done, yet, Mayor Sim ordered the shuttering of the Office of the Integrity Commissioner while, it should be noted, he was under investigation for wrongdoing by Lisa Southern, then the City’s Integrity Commissioner. Ken Sim was unsuccessful in that venture.

As we wrote on Monday, Ken Sim and his ABC administration chose to expend $13.4 million to purchase FIFA tickets for their ‘friends’, choosing not to act on a recommendation by several health agencies to install suicide prevention barriers on the Granville Street Bridge, going so far this past March to not even bother to include a budget for the barriers in the 2026 – 2030 Capital Expenditure question set to be placed before voters who go to the polls this October.

Earlier this month, ABC Vancouver proposed and passed a public safety plebiscite motion designed to bolster their re-election chances, and cause fear among the public on issues related to the unhoused, street entrenched members of our community who ABC said they’d ‘crack down on’ by clearing the streets, without even the barest hint of compassion and caring for this vulnerable population.

Cruelty — as can be seen from the above examples — inflicts pain, creates division and would seem to stem from Ken Sim’s fear, insecurity or a desire for power and control.

Kindness, on the other hand, offers care, builds connection and requires the conscious strength to look beyond our most primal instincts.

Cruelty can deliberately hurt people or simply disregard their well-being. Kindness acts with generosity, empathy and a genuine desire to help.

These qualities do not remain confined to our personal lives. They shape our institutions, our communities and, ultimately, our politics.

A private act of cruelty may hurt one person.

A political decision can hurt thousands — or millions

That is why the character of political leadership matters, why who we elect to hold office at Vancouver City Hall this October matters.

Across much of the democratic world, political debate has grown harsher, more personal and more contemptuous.

Opponents are portrayed not merely as people who are wrong, but as enemies who must be humiliated, silenced or destroyed. Anger has become a political commodity, and cruelty is too often mistaken for strength.

But cruelty is not strength. It is a political choice.

And kindness is not weakness. Properly understood, it is a demanding principle — one that requires us to recognize the dignity of people with whom we disagree and to judge public policy by its consequences for the whole community.

At its foundation, politics exists to organize society for the common good. Governments collect taxes, build institutions, establish laws and distribute public resources because human beings cannot flourish entirely on their own. Politics is therefore, at its best, an exercise in deciding how we will live together.

Kindness belongs at the centre of political decision-making in Vancouver

This does not mean that politics should become sentimental, conflict-free or incapable of making difficult decisions.

A kind government must sometimes say no. It must enforce laws, confront corruption, protect the vulnerable and make choices that inevitably disappoint some people. Kindness does not eliminate accountability. It changes the purpose behind accountability.

The distinction matters. Cruelty seeks punishment, humiliation or exclusion for its own sake. Kindness seeks justice while recognizing our common humanity.

Indeed, some of the cruelest political decisions are not dramatic acts of violence. They are administrative decisions that allow suffering to continue because those suffering have little political power.

When governments tolerate homelessness, inadequate mental-health services, unaffordable housing, preventable poverty or unsafe working conditions, the resulting suffering can become invisible. No one person may be responsible; rather, it is the collective decision not to act.

This is why kindness cannot simply mean being personally pleasant. Political kindness must be institutional.

Kindness asks whether our laws, budgets and public services recognize that every human being has value — including people who are poor, addicted, homeless, elderly, disabled, unpopular or politically inconvenient.

Kindness also requires justice.

Kindness without justice can become patronizing: the powerful offering charity to those whom they have helped keep powerless. A genuinely humane politics therefore seeks both compassion and equality.

Nor should kindness be confused with political weakness.

Sometimes the kindest decision is the hardest one.

Preventing an environmental catastrophe may require restrictions today to protect people tomorrow. Addressing climate change means accepting responsibilities to generations that cannot yet vote.

Building affordable housing require government to challenge powerful interests. Providing treatment to people suffering from addiction demands resources, patience and political courage long after the cameras have disappeared.

This is not an act of softness; it is an act of responsibility.

There is also a danger in turning kindness itself into a political weapon.

Politicians can perform compassion while pursuing policies that deepen inequality. They can speak warmly about community while governing indifferently. Kindness must therefore be measured not by rhetoric but by outcomes.

The ultimate test is simple.

Does a political decision reduce unnecessary suffering, expand human dignity and strengthen the capacity of people to live meaningful lives together?

If it does, it deserves to be called humane.

If it deliberately increases suffering merely to satisfy anger, revenge or political calculation, we should have the courage to call it cruel.

A healthy democracy does not require everyone to agree. It requires citizens and leaders to recognize that disagreement does not cancel our shared humanity.

That may be the most important lesson of all.

The Structural Cruelty of Life Under Ken Sim’s ABC Vancouver Regime

Mayor Ken Sim at the podium, and his ABC Vancouver Councillors behind him, left to right, Councillors Brian Montague, Lisa Dominato, Lenny Zhou, Mike Klassen and Peter Meiszner

Political cruelty does not always look cruel.

Sometimes there is no angry politician, no deliberate act of violence and no obvious villain. Instead, cruelty can be embedded within laws, regulations, economic systems and bureaucratic procedures.

A government can deny people access to housing, healthcare or basic social supports. Criminal justice policies can punish poverty rather than address its causes. Immigration policies can separate families. Economic policies can leave people without meaningful opportunities while political rhetoric tells them their suffering is entirely their own fault.

This is structural cruelty.

It is particularly dangerous because responsibility becomes dispersed. The politician signs the legislation. The bureaucrat administers it. The agency enforces it. The taxpayer finances it. The public becomes accustomed to it.

And the person suffering can disappear behind statistics.

Kindness requires political leaders to reverse that process — to put the human being back at the centre of political decision-making.

Kindness Could Be A Core Political Value in Vancouver Should We Choose

At its core, kindness means empathy, respect and a genuine concern for others. Woven into political practice, it fosters collaboration, promotes inclusion and creates the possibility of pursuing justice and equality without first dehumanizing those with whom we disagree.

Kindness should therefore not be viewed as a soft alternative to serious politics.

It is serious politics.

Political decision-making determines how resources, rights and opportunities are distributed throughout society.

Every budget contains moral choices. Every tax system reflects priorities. Every housing policy says something about whose needs are considered urgent. Every healthcare decision reveals how much value society places upon human well-being.

When kindness is embedded in those decisions, governments are more likely to consider the consequences for people who are most vulnerable.

Policies reflecting kindness are not acts of charity. Social justice is not simply about giving something to people who have less. It is an acknowledgment of our shared humanity and our shared dependence upon one another.

Children depend upon adults. Older people depend upon younger generations. People become sick, disabled or unemployed. Families experience poverty. Individuals encounter addiction, mental illness, grief and homelessness.

At different points in our lives, almost all of us depend upon the kindness and institutions of others.

A compassionate society recognizes this vulnerability rather than pretending that every person succeeds or fails entirely through individual effort.

Kindness, Justice and Equality Must Define Politics in Vancouver

Kindness has a particularly important role in advancing justice and equity.

Justice asks whether people are being treated fairly.

Kindness asks us to understand what those people are experiencing.

The two belong together.

A society cannot claim to be just while ignoring the suffering of people who have little political power. Nor can it create genuine equality by treating every person as though their circumstances were identical.

Kindness demands political leaders look beyond abstract statistics and consider the lived experience behind them.

What does an unemployment rate mean to the family that cannot pay its rent?

What does a housing shortage mean to the person sleeping in a shelter?

What does a healthcare waiting list mean to someone living with pain?

What does climate change mean to a community whose home, livelihood or food supply is threatened?

These are not merely economic or administrative questions. They are human questions.

Our Current Climate Emergency, and the Politics of Future Generations

Climate change, our current climate emergency, provides one of the clearest examples of why kindness must extend beyond immediate political interests.

The consequences of climate change disproportionately affect many of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities, despite the fact that those communities have often contributed the least to the accumulation of greenhouse-gas emissions.

A kind approach to environmental policy therefore looks beyond the next election cycle.

It considers future generations.

Political leaders who approach climate policy through empathy and equity recognize that today’s decisions will affect people who have no vote in today’s elections. Children not yet born will inherit the consequences of choices made by today’s governments.

Kindness, in this context, becomes a form of responsibility.

It means refusing to define political success solely in terms of immediate economic gain. It means considering whether our prosperity is being purchased at the expense of people elsewhere — or at the expense of generations yet to come.

Environmental justice is therefore not charity. It is an expression of shared responsibility.

The Choice Vancouver Voters Face When Going to the Polls This October

In an age of polarization, kindness may indeed appear naïve.

But perhaps what appears naïve is actually what has become radical: the belief that politics should be about improving people’s lives.

Kindness can humanize political dialogue, rebuild trust and create the conditions for co-operation. It can help repair the fractures within democratic institutions and allow leaders to confront enormous challenges — including inequality, housing, healthcare, climate change and public safety — with greater empathy and clarity.

Kindness does not mean abandoning principle.

It means pursuing principle without abandoning humanity.

Cruelty tells us that some people are disposable.

Kindness insists that every person matters.

Cruelty divides society into winners and losers, insiders and outsiders, deserving and undeserving.

Kindness asks what circumstances produced inequality and what can be done to reduce unnecessary suffering.

Cruelty governs through fear.

Kindness governs through trust.

Politics is ultimately a choice about which side of human nature we cultivate.

A society that rewards cruelty will inevitably produce more cruelty. A society that rewards empathy, responsibility and mutual care can create the conditions for more kindness.

The greatest measure of political leadership should not simply be who can command the most authority, win the most votes or dominate the political conversation.

It should be who understands the extraordinary responsibility that comes with power.

The true test of a political society is what it does with its power when nobody is powerful enough to stop it.

That is where cruelty and kindness cease to be abstract philosophical concepts.

They become the daily reality of people’s lives.

And in the political realm, choosing kindness is not merely a matter of being nice.

It is a decision about what — and whom — a society is willing to value.

We can be tough without being cruel. We can demand accountability without demanding humiliation. We can defend public safety without abandoning compassion. We can disagree passionately without deciding that our opponents are less deserving of dignity than ourselves.

Politics will always involve conflict. There will always be competing interests, limited resources and difficult choices. Kindness will never remove those realities.

But it can determine how we confront them.

The choice between cruelty and kindness is therefore not a choice between weakness and strength. It is a choice between two visions of political life.

One sees society as a battlefield in which winners triumph over losers.

The other sees society as a community where freedom and prosperity are inseparable from the well-being of others.

The first may produce fear, obedience and temporary political victories.

The second offers something far more difficult — and more enduring: a society in which power is exercised not simply to control people, but to help people flourish.

That is not naïve politics.

It is politics worthy of the name.