Tag Archives: lucy maloney

#VanPoli | Vancouver Council’s Priorities Early in Their New Term of Office

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, Canada, City Development Planning, Housing, News, Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

(Re-published article, written by Isabella Zavarise for CTV Vancouver News)

Vancouver Councillors Pledge to Reverse Previous Council’s Decisions

Vancouver City Councillors say they’re ready to get to work and deliver on their campaign promises, following a new term that will see a left-leaning council led by the city’s first Green Party Mayor.

On Saturday, Vancouverites elected four Councillors from COPE and the Vancouver Green Party, as well as Lucy Maloney with One City and ABC’s Mike Klassen.

The Greens and COPE are already committing to some shared promises such as reviewing the city’s budget.

COPE City Councillor Sean Orr, who received the highest number of votes of any Council candidate, with 83,038, said that will be one of his first priorities following inauguration in November.

“We didn’t see a lot of transparency in the last budget,” he said.

“It was famously very small. It wasn’t line-by-line. So, we need to go in and look at that and see the mess that we can clean up, see some opportunities as well for some cost savings.”

Annette Reilly, a newly elected City Councillor with the Greens, agreed, adding that once the budget is reviewed, the party would like to re-introduce some of the initiatives that were scrapped in the previous four years under ABC, such as the Renters Office which was shuttered in 2023, and the Equity Office which closed last year.

Reilly said she wants to champion renewing leases for co-ops, and address faster permitting for child-care spaces.

“That’s something I’d like to focus on right away,” she said.

Both Orr, Maloney and Reilly support reversing the ban on net-new supportive housing.

Orr said he will also be initiating a motion to bring back the city’s Living Wage Policy, which was scrapped in January, and will advocate for greater funding for libraries and recreation centers.

“Vancouver does have a lot of money, and we can fully fund the things that make Vancouver great, like our arts organizations,” he said.

COPE’s platform included a mansion tax, which would impose a one per cent tax on homes over $5 million to pay for public housing.

“We definitely think that there’s a lot of wealth in Vancouver, and that wealth can be redistributed,” said Orr.

As for the Vancouver Police budget, Orr said he believes there will be cost savings there.

He added that he supports the Greens’ campaign promise to introduce a Community Response Outreach Workers Team to respond to non-emergency calls regarding homelessness, public intoxication, and mental health crises.

“Getting mental health off of the plate of the police,” Orr said.

“We know that they don’t want to be doing that work either, and we need to be addressing that proactively, not re-actively.”

Both Orr and Reilly added they’re looking forward to the next term, and plan to work across party lines.

Lucy Maloney, with One City, said, “Vancouver residents have clearly expressed their desire for a progressive majority working collaboratively.”

Maloney added she’s committed to deliver results residents expect, “by drawing on our diverse perspectives.”

ABC’s Mike Klassen shared a similar sentiment, adding he looks forward to working constructively with his colleagues, regardless of political affiliation.

“I recognize that my role this term will be different, but I’ll seek common ground wherever possible while ensuring Vancouverites have a strong, independent voice at City Hall.”

There is a great deal of work to be undertaken by the incoming Vancouver Council.

#VanPoli | Change is on The Near Horizon | Hope

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Council: Unofficial 2026 Vancouver Election Results

Mayor (one to be elected)

  • FRY, Pete – GREEN: 98,494

At the end of the day, the 2026 Vancouver municipal election came down to a two-way race between two-term Green City Councillor Pete Fry, and ABC Vancouver Mayoral incumbent, Ken Sim. The other three high-profile Mayoral contenders then became collateral damage in the pitched battle as to who would sit in the Mayor’s office, and chair Council meetings — beginning in the afternoon after the Inauguration of the new Council — on Monday, November 2nd through the 2030 municipal election, on as an yet undecided date.


Peter Armstrong, NPA / ABC Vancouver President, owner of the Rocky Mountaineer

On Election Day 2014, VanRamblings spent day the with Peter Armstrong (Peter is a friend, whom we love with our whole soul, body and entire heart) — the then President of the Non-Partisan Association (NPA), and the owner of the Rocky Mountaineer — at NPA Election Day headquarters, in the ballroom at the Fairmont Hotel Vancouver.

At 11am, Peter got a call from Dimitri Pantazopoulos — the longtime Stephen Harper pollster, pollster for ABC Vancouver, and current Deputy Manager of the Conservative Party of B.C. election campaign — who told Peter that NPA Mayoral candidate Kirk LaPointe was running 15 points ahead of Gregor Robertson, according to their Friday night polling.

At 4pm, Peter got another call from Dimitri — explaining that Kirk was now running 15 points behind Gregor Robertson, the extensive exit polling showing that voters believed both Gregor Robertson and Kirk LaPointe stood for pretty much the same thing, and voters were making the decision to cast their ballot for Gregor over Kirk, “the devil they knew, over the devil they didn’t know.”

That is pretty much the same story in 2026.

Where Vancouver Liberals internal polling showed that their Mayoral candidate, Kareem Allam, was pretty much taking over Ken Sim’s vote on Vancouver’s west side — Point Grey, Dunbar, Kerrisdale and Shaughnessy, that had Allam polling at 22%, and in a statistical dead heat with Ken Sim — on Election Day, Saturday, October 17th, Allam’s vote collapsed and returned to Ken Sim, so fearful were right-of-centre voters about the potential for a “progressive Mayor”,  in the form of Pete Fry. Both TEAM’s Colleen Hardwick and Vote Vancouver’s Rebecca Bligh suffered from a similar fate at the polls on Election Day.

Councillors (10 to be elected)

1. ORR, Sean – COPE: 83,038
2. REILLY, Annette – GREEN: 78,476
3. LESLIE, Chloe – COPE: 67,791
4. SINGH, Devyani – COPE: 65,473
5. SMITH, Stephanie – GREEN: 64,070
6. MALONEY, Lucy – OneCity: 63,143
7. DUMONT, Camil – GREEN: 62,540
8. YI-KIERAN, Solomon – COPE: 60,361
9. KLASSEN, Mike – ABC Vancouver: 57,798
10. BURNS, Bridget – GREEN: 57,788

As we have previously written, in many ways the 2026 election reminds us very much of the 2002 Vancouver municipal election.

In 2002, incumbent Non-Partisan Association (NPA) City Councillor Jennifer Clarke staged a right wing coup to unseat popular NPA Mayor Philip Owen as Mayor of the City of Vancouver, arising from her unhappiness with Mayor Owen’s implementation of his innovative and humane Four Pillars Drug Policy, which constituted a novel strategy pioneered in Switzerland representing a tectonic shift from treating substance use as a criminal justice issue towards a public health approach. The approach placed an equal focus on harm reduction, prevention, treatment, and enforcement.

Jennifer Clarke’s bid to unseat the NPA’s popular, grassroots Mayor was successful, and in 2002 Jennifer Clarke presented herself to the Vancouver voting public as the standard bearer for the Non-Partisan Association (NPA). Pundits, politicos and the media felt quite assured that Ms. Clarke would sail to victory, for a 5th consecutive term to form a majority NPA Council. Some of us weren’t quite so sure.

In 2002, Vancouver City Council had only two elected COPE members on Council: Fred Bass and Tim Louis. The members and electeds of the Non-Partisan Association were confident that they would once again sweep Council, Park Board and School Board, as they had for the previous 12 years, and for much of the 20th century.

Of course, as happens so often, all of this political calculation failed to account for how the general public viewed Ms. Clarke’s unseemly unseating of the city’s favourite Mayor.

When the 2002 Vancouver municipal election rolled around, COPE swept Council (8 of 10 seats), swept Park Board (5 of 7 seats), and swept all the open positions around the Board of Education table (taking 7 of 9 seats), with the Greens’ Andrea Reimer holding down the 9th spot, with the Vancouver School Board.

So, for VanRamblings, the sweep of all three civic bodies by COPE and the Greens (with OneCity doing well on School Board, and re-electing OneCity’s Lucy Maloney for Council) in 2026 came as no particular surprise. Clearly, the voters of Vancouver were anxious to rid themselves of the stain of the mean-spirited civic administration of Mayor Ken Sim, and his lickspittle contingent of ABC Vancouver City Councillors.

Perhaps the most hopeful interaction VanRamblings had on Saturday evening — apart from all the hugs we received from good-hearted folks at the Vancouver Liberals Saturday night event, and at COPE’s Victory Party at the Japanese School on Alexander Street — occurred as we were nearing the entrance of the COPE party, when we ran across COPE fundraiser Gabe Goodman — flat out, one of our favourite people in the world! — who greeted us, and said …

“Thank you for taking the time to attend COPE’s Victory Party tonight, and spend time with the hundreds of good folks and staunch supporters of COPE, who you’ll see inside. Along with almost everyone else I know, I am an inveterate reader of VanRamblings, and I want to assure you, Raymond, that a key component of how the newly-elected and the re-elected members of COPE will bring themselves to their work is with kindness as a core value. I know you’ve written about the necessity of kindness in civic life. COPE has taken that notion to heart, as a core strength of our party.”

And, finally, a note to Shawn Vulliez, COPE’s very able, genius campaign manager.

Shawn Vulliez, left, COPE’s campaign manager, and Sean Orr, topping the polls for Council

Shawn: We recommend you turn your attention — working / consulting with Mayor-elect Pete Fry — to staffing the Selection Committee of Council, whose three members will choose among the thousands of applications that will be made to fill the 300+ positions that will soon be posted and made available to the public, whose members will sit on the very important Advisory Boards to Council. Might we suggest that COPE’s Devyani Singh (or Sean Orr, who might be too busy!) and Solomon Yi-Kieran sit as members of the Selection Committee, along with the Greens’ Stephanie Smith. Whatever decision you and Mayor-elect Fry arrive at will be the right decision. The Selection Committee — of which Mayor-elect Fry has been a member for the past four years — is critical to the new Council putting into place Advisory Board members who best reflect the values and civic goals of the citizens of Vancouver, and our newly-elected Vancouver City Council.

Might we suggest, as well, that you give some consideration to encouraging COPE supporter and longtime community activist Ian Marcuse — whose work on the Grandview Woodland Food Connection has supported low-income and vulnerable residents in East Vancouver — as well as the Seniors Community Kitchen, where accessible cooking and social spaces designed to support older adults in the neighbourhood has existed to support vulnerable members of our seniors population.

Now, we know that Ian would be a perfect candidate for the Vancouver Food Policy Council (VFPC) Advisory Committee, but we’d sure like to see Ian sit as a member of the Board of Variance — often referred to as the most powerful creature of civic government — where we first met Mr. Marcuse 20+ years ago, when we were sitting as a member on the COPE-dominated Board of Variance.

And don’t forget social activist and artist Irwin Oostindie, who founded the Under the Volcano Festival of Art & Social Change, and worked as the Planning Director of the Wild Bird Trust of BC in North Vancouver, which focused on decolonizing conservation, restoration and research based at Maplewood Flats, on the unceded sel̓íl̓witulh/Tsleil-Waututh lands and waters — among myriad other projects with which Irwin has been involved.

We think Irwin would make for an outstanding member of Vancouver’s City Planning Commission, a Council-appointed citizens’ advisory body that counsels Vancouver City Council on matters including housing, the public realm, neighbourhoods, transportation, and public engagement. Just sayin’ … a little food for thought.

As for us, we’re giving some consideration to making application to Vancouver’s Older Persons and Elders Advisory Committee (OPEAC) when the posting is made — cuz, you know, we’re kind of getting older now — which committee advises Vancouver City Council and staff on improving access, inclusion, and services for aging residents.

Ken Sim’s $550,000 Question: Is Vancouver’s Public-Safety Plebiscite Really About Governing?

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, News, Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , , , , , ,

There are few issues more important to Vancouver than public safety, open-air drug use and the city’s increasingly desperate struggle to respond to addiction and severe mental illness.

That is precisely why Mayor Ken Sim and his ABC Vancouver majority on City Council should be held to a higher standard than the one they have set for themselves in putting two non-binding plebiscite questions on the October 17 municipal election ballot.

The questions concern matters on which every Vancouverite has an opinion.

Plebiscite Questions

  • Open-Air Drug Use: Asks voters if they support the city strengthening its laws and bylaws to forbid open-air hard drug use (such as fentanyl, crack, meth, and heroin) in public spaces.
  • Involuntary Care Beds: Asks voters if Vancouver should formally request that the provincial government provide over 100 voluntary and involuntary mental health and addiction treatment beds within the city, specifically referencing the St. Paul’s Hospital site

The first asks whether voters support strengthening the city’s laws and bylaws to forbid open-air use of hard drugs — including fentanyl, crack, methamphetamine and heroin — in public spaces.

The second asks whether Vancouver should formally request that the provincial government establish a secure medical facility with more than 100 voluntary and involuntary mental-health and addiction treatment beds, potentially at portions of the former St. Paul’s Hospital site.

The questions passed during the emergency Council meeting held this past Thursday, August 13th, occurred amidst heated opposition.

Councillors Pete Fry (the Greens) and Sean Orr (COPE) walked out of the impromptu Council meeting in protest, while Lucy Maloney (OneCity Vancouver) remained in chambers and voted no.

Why, after nearly four years in office, does Mayor Ken Sim and his ABC Vancouver majority need a $400,000-to-$550,000 election-day plebiscite, roughly 4% to 6% the municipal election budget?

That is the question voters should be asking.

What Vancouver’s 2026 Mayoral Candidates Have to Say

The Mayoral candidates have exposed the political calculation differently.

Kareem Allam, the Vancouver Liberals candidate and Sim’s former chief of staff, has been particularly blunt. Allam argues that residents do not need another survey; they need a city government that actually acts. His central criticism is that Sim is spending public money asking permission to do things City Council can already pursue and that the Mayor can already raise directly with Premier David Eby.

Kareem Allam rejected Ken Sim’s public-safety plebiscite outright, calling it political theatre rather than a solution to Vancouver’s public safety issues.

Allam’s argument: Vancouverites do not need another survey about public safety.

“The people of Vancouver need a municipal government that actually delivers results. Ken Sim has had four years to address public safety and rather than conditions improving they have deteriorated.”

Allam also sees the plebiscite as a distraction from ABC’s record, describing Sim’s 2026 campaign as effectively “campaigning against his 2022 campaign.” Allam also questioned the wisdom of holding a referendum on matters that extend beyond the city’s jurisdiction and mandate, his most pointed criticism that …

“The Mayor’s job is about governing not campaigning: if Sim believes open-air drug use must be prohibited and Vancouver needs substantially more treatment capacity, the Mayor should use the powers and political relationships he already possesses rather than spend hundreds of thousands of dollars asking voters a non-binding question.”

Allam: “Residents don’t need another survey. They need a city that works.”

That is a devastating criticism precisely because it comes from someone who knows how Sim’s administration operates.

In a statement released following the plebiscite vote, COPE Mayoral candidate Stephanie Allen suggested there is public drug use …

“Because predators are being given free rein to kick people out of their homes for money for profit, abuse children, or sell poison drugs. If we want real public safety in Vancouver, we need to crack down on predators in our communities, both in the mansions and in the streets.”

Allen was sharply critical of Mayor Ken Sim and ABC Vancouver’s decision to spend as much as $550,000 putting two non-binding public-safety questions on the October 17 municipal-election ballot, characterizing it as an “expensive re-election gimmick” designed to “scapegoat the vulnerable” and distract Vancouverites from the record of the Sim administration.

Allen went on to say that …

“Ken Sim has had four years — and an overwhelming Council majority — to act on public safety, mental-health and addiction issues,” she told The Tyee. “Governments should address poverty and the mental-health and addictions crisis directly, while also drawing attention to less visible forms of violence, including gender-based violence,” describing public safety as a political “football” that can obscure the deeper social problems producing street disorder.

Allen isn’t arguing that Vancouver should simply tolerate open-air drug use.

Rather, she is challenging ABC’s method and motives.

Allen’s position is essentially: if ABC believes these measures are necessary, why hasn’t it acted during the four years it has controlled City Hall?

Pete Fry, the Green Party candidate and one of the Councillors who walked out of the emergency meeting in protest, has likewise challenged ABC’s approach to public safety. Fry’s broader position is that Vancouver’s problems require municipal leadership that combines enforcement with housing, mental-health and social services rather than reducing public safety to policing alone.

Fry’s objection is not to safer streets; it is to the false choice ABC presents between public safety and more comprehensive solutions.

Colleen Hardwick, a Mayoral candidate for TEAM for a Livable Vancouver, strongly opposes Mayor Ken Sim’s proposed public safety plebiscite, dismissing it as a costly political stunt and an expensive re-election gimmick.

Key Stances from Colleen Hardwick

  • Waste of Public Funds: Hardwick criticized the plebiscite — which is estimated to cost about half a million dollars — as an unnecessary distraction.
  • Ineffective Leadership: She stated that Sim and his ABC Vancouver majority had four years to address the addictions and public safety crisis but failed to deliver meaningful solutions.
  • Recovery-Oriented Approach: Instead of short-term political theatre regarding open-air drug use, Hardwick advocates for serious, lasting solutions focused on recovery and livability.
  • Council Authority: Echoing broader criticisms following the approval of the Vancouver public safety plebiscite, opponents note that the city already has the authority to adjust bylaws and address these issues without spending public money on a non-binding ballot question.

Colleen Hardwick, running again for TEAM for a Livable Vancouver, brings a different critique. Hardwick has repeatedly argued that municipalities must concentrate on their actual jurisdiction and that politicians should resist simplistic answers to complicated problems. As she has observed in discussing the Downtown Eastside and public safety, politicians can exploit fear and anger because frightened voters turn out. Her warning is especially relevant here: complex problems cannot be solved by slogans.

Rebecca Bligh, running for Mayor with Vote Vancouver after being expelled from the ABC caucus, has emphasized that public safety must extend beyond a purely reactive police response. She argues for embedded health services, supportive housing and less bureaucratic access to addiction and mental-health care. Her position is particularly significant because she once sat inside Sim’s governing coalition and now offers an alternative to its approach.

“If Ken Sim wanted to do something about improving public safety, he could have done so as Mayor, Police Chair, and head of a majority Council. Instead, Vancouver has suffered a failure of leadership. Ken Sim has joined successive mayors and councils in doing too little for too long.

In case Ken Sim doesn’t know: strengthening the City’s laws is literally the Mayor’s job. A plebiscite to ‘strengthen the City of Vancouver’s laws’ to tackle open air drug use is pure political theatre – he’s making grand claims that he can’t execute and playing politics with people’s lives as a stunt.”

And William Azaroff, the OneCity Vancouver Mayoral candidate, has positioned himself as part of a broader progressive challenge to Sim, emphasizing housing, community and social supports rather than the punitive politics that ABC has increasingly embraced.

OneCity’s approach rejects the notion that public safety can be separated from homelessness, poverty, housing and access to treatment.

None of these candidates is proposing that Vancouver simply tolerate dangerous public behaviour.

That is the straw man ABC needs voters to believe.

The City of Vancouver Deserves Governing, Not Campaigning

There is a legitimate public-safety crisis in Vancouver. Pretending otherwise would be irresponsible.

But exploiting that crisis politically is equally irresponsible.

If Ken Sim believes public drug use should be prohibited, he should tell Vancouverites exactly how he intends to do it.

If he believes Vancouver needs 100-plus involuntary treatment beds, he should sit down with the premier and negotiate the agreement.

If he believes the old St. Paul’s site is appropriate, he should explain how a property already sold for redevelopment would be made available.

And if he believes these matters are urgent, he should have been doing all of this during the past four years — not two months before an election.

The $550,000 plebiscite is not the solution to Vancouver’s public-safety crisis.

It is a symptom of a government that has discovered, very late in its mandate, that asking voters whether they want something is considerably easier than actually delivering it.

Vancouverites deserve safer streets. They deserve treatment beds. They deserve a serious response to addiction and mental illness.

Most of all, they deserve a government capable of governing.

A Question Without A Policy: Ken Sim Doesn’t Know What He’s Doing

The first question asked in the plebiscite is perhaps the most revealing.

Voters are being asked whether they want Vancouver to “strengthen its laws” to prohibit public consumption of hard drugs.

But which laws?

When asked what specific bylaws ABC intends to change, Sim reportedly could not provide an answer. His response was essentially that the city would look at the laws after the plebiscite.

That turns democratic consultation upside down.

Normally, government proposes a policy, explains what it will do, tells citizens what it will cost and then asks elected representatives — or voters — to approve it.

Here, ABC is asking voters to approve a concept without telling them precisely what the concept means.

Worse, open-air drug consumption is not simply a municipal-policy vacuum waiting for Ken Sim to fill. Criminal law, prosecution, health care and much of the regulation of controlled substances lie with the federal and provincial governments. The province’s three-year decriminalization experiment has already ended, and small-quantity possession is once again illegal.

If the Mayor believes Vancouver needs stronger municipal enforcement against public drug use, he has had four years to bring forward a concrete bylaw.

For four years Mayor Ken Sim has enjoyed a bullet-proof Council majority.

As a Mayor with a Council majority, Sim has the authority to propose legislation.

What exactly has prevented him from acting?

On October 17th, voters will have the opportunity to decide whether Ken Sim and his team of  ABC Vancouver City Councillors have done their job.

Two non-binding questions costing half a million dollars should not be allowed to substitute for the answer.

Vancouver 2026: The Shape of the Next Civic Showdown

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , , , , , , , , , ,

On October 17, 2026, Vancouver voters will head to the polls for the city’s 42nd municipal election. With the once-dominant ABC Vancouver now floundering, and new forces surging from both the centre and the left, next year’s election campaign promises to be one of the most competitive — and transformative — in decades.

The Collapse of ABC Vancouver

In 2022, Ken Sim’s ABC Vancouver swept all three levels of municipal governance — Mayor, City Council, Park Board, and School Board — in an historic rout. Four years later, that landslide looks like an aberration, the result of voter fatigue with the now moribund Vision Vancouver and a desire for change.

Since then, however, the Sim administration has struggled. Public dissatisfaction with his handling of homelessness, public safety, and affordability has steadily grown. Community groups accuse Sim of being unresponsive; critics inside City Hall describe an administration consumed with internal squabbles. By 2026, Sim’s brand has soured to the point where many observers believe his party faces the same fate as the Non-Partisan Association (NPA) before it: political extinction.

Few expect ABC Vancouver to elect more than one or two Councillors — if that — while Sim’s re-election prospects appear dim. His fate seems sealed: destined, as one longtime watcher quipped, “for the scrap heap of civic history.”

The Rise of the Vancouver Liberals

Into this vacuum steps Kareem Allam, the political strategist best known for his work on high-profile campaigns across the province, and federally. With deep connections to federal and provincial networks, Allam has quietly built a formidable war chest and, earlier this year, formally launched the Vancouver Liberals.

Armed with deep pockets, disciplined messaging, and a polished campaign operation, the Vancouver Liberals are poised to make a splash in their first municipal contest. Allam himself has already announced his intention to run for Mayor. Though untested on the ballot, he enters the race with credibility as a strategist, access to resources, and the ability to tap into moderate, disillusioned ABC voters.

The question is whether Allam can translate money and machinery into broad support in a city still wary of political rebranding. His pitch — competence, pragmatism, and fiscal responsibility — will resonate with centrist homeowners and business interests. The Vancouver Liberals will likely emerge as a significant force on Council and could very well win the mayoralty if progressive forces split the vote.

The Green Party of Vancouver

The Greens enter 2026 with only one sitting Councillor, Pete Fry, who has proven durable and personable. Fry’s strength lies in his grassroots connections and ability to appear pragmatic rather than ideological. He will almost certainly hold his seat.

But the Greens face the perennial challenge of being seen as a single-issue party. With climate concerns real but overshadowed by affordability and housing, their ceiling remains low. Expect one or two seats at most, unless they can expand their message to broader urban issues.

COPE’s Resurgence

The Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE), long a marginal presence, has been reinvigorated by activist energy. The April 2025 by-election was a turning point: Sean Orr, poverty and housing activist, topped the polls, proving that unapologetic left-wing politics still have a constituency in Vancouver.

Orr’s victory has galvanized COPE’s base, particularly among renters, young voters, and those frustrated with market-driven housing policy. If COPE can harness that momentum, they could secure multiple seats on Council for the first time in a generation.

OneCity’s Momentum

Meanwhile, OneCity Vancouver has built a reputation as the progressive party best positioned to compete citywide. The April by-election was a breakthrough: Lucy Maloney scored a resounding victory, finishing just behind Orr, cementing OneCity’s profile.

With a strong organization, a message rooted in housing reform, and credibility among progressive professionals, OneCity is poised to expand its presence. They are likely to elect several Councillors, and could, in the right alignment of votes, mount a credible mayoral challenge in future cycles.

TEAM for a Livable Vancouver

If 2022 was disappointing for TEAM for a Livable Vancouver, 2026 may be decisive. The party, rooted in nostalgia for the TEAM brand of the 1970s, ran a distant third four years ago and failed to elect anyone. Their anti-development messaging resonates in pockets of the west side, but increasingly feels out of step with a city desperate for housing solutions.

TEAM’s leader, Colleen Hardwick, will once again run for mayor. Though she brings name recognition and experience, her prospects remain dim. Without a breakthrough, TEAM risks irrelevance.

The Mayoral Race

With Ken Sim floundering and Colleen Hardwick confined to a narrow base, the Mayoral contest appears to be shaping into a four-way showdown between Ken Sim, Kareem Allam, Rebecca Bligh, Colleen Hardwick and the progressive forces aligned with COPE and OneCity.

  • Ken Sim (ABC Vancouver): The incumbent’s approval ratings have cratered. Re-election is highly unlikely.

  • Colleen Hardwick (TEAM): Hardwick will keep TEAM visible, but her chances of victory remain minimal.

  • Kareem Allam (Vancouver Liberals): A brilliant strategist with money and momentum, Allam could emerge as the leading challenger to Sim. His appeal to centrists and disillusioned moderates makes him a real contender.

  • Rebecca Bligh (Independent/possible Vancouver Liberals ally): The two-term Councillor has yet to formally declare, but her active fundraising signals intent. Bligh’s profile is strong: current two-term president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, respected within Vancouver, with cross-partisan appeal. If she enters, she could fracture the centrist vote — or, if aligned with Allam, form a powerhouse ticket.

A Fragmented Future

The 2026 election is shaping up to be less about a single dominant party and more about a fragmented Council, with multiple blocs competing for influence. COPE and OneCity on the left, the Vancouver Liberals in the centre, and the Greens straddling the middle will likely form the core of the next council. ABC and TEAM, once serious players, appear destined for the margins.

The mayoralty will hinge on whether progressives can consolidate behind a single candidate or whether the vote splinters. If divided, Allam and the Vancouver Liberals may well capture the Mayor’s chair, ushering in a new centrist era. If united, the left has a chance to seize city hall.

Either way, October 17, 2026, will mark a turning point. The Sim era is over; what comes next is still unwritten.

An Important Note

Today’s VanRamblings’ column was created entirely by Open AI’s ChatGPT artificial intelligence engine, in response to the instruction: write a 900 word column on the 2026 Vancouver municipal election, and the 5 parties seeking office that intend to run candidates for Vancouver City Council. In addition, write about the candidates for Vancouver Mayor, and what you believe their prospects will be come 2026.