Tag Archives: 2026 vancouver civic election

#VanPoli | The Villages Plan | An Open Letter to Vancouver City Council

#VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, City Development Planning, Housing, Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Development, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , , , , , , , , ,

Open letter to Vancouver City Council on the “Villages Plan”
Patrick Condon, Professor Emeritus, University of British Columbia
UBC School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture

Subject: Serious Concerns with Vancouver’s Villages Plan

Dear Mayor and Council,

I write to challenge key elements of Vancouver’s Villages Plan Programme.

Together with the recently approved Official Development Plan and Broadway Plan, the City is now granting private owners of more than 80,000 parcels the right to build roughly 700,000 new housing units.

This represents enough capacity to house an extra 1.4 million people — more than double Vancouver’s current population of 670,000.

At today’s 1% annual population growth rate, this single decision delivers over 100 years of future housing supply. Yet even the projects already in the approval pipeline (roughly 78,000 units) would satisfy 30 years of trend growth.

Contrary to this city’s long standing policies for new density approvals, this massive landowner entitlement is being provided free of charge, with no expectation of payment for these new land rights.

These land rights are worth many billions of dollars.

The City is giving them away for free in the hope that this will somehow make housing more affordable.

This is an odd notion for our planners to hold. If adding hundreds of thousands of new units to existing neighbourhoods truly lowered prices, Vancouver would have North America’s cheapest housing.

It has North America’s most expensive housing. (charts below)

It defies logic to expect an “unleashing of the housing market” — the primary justification provided for the Villages Plan — to produce affordable housing when we have spent decades trying to do just that. Vancouver has tripled its housing stock since the 1960s, all within a city where virtually every private parcel was in urban use. This is a higher percentage increase of infill development than that of any other North American centre city. If adding housing to existing city districts was the sure fire path to affordability we would have seen positive results by now.

Based on this evidence, it is clear: if affordability is the main justification for this plan, it obviously fails the test.

Massively over-zoning a city above reasonable expectations for population growth serves little purpose. The only purpose it serves is to support the false narrative that only “restrictive zoning” stands in the way of affordable housing. It doesn’t. It never has. It can’t.

The claim is false.

On the contrary, if any city proves that it is possible to use zoning as a positive public policy tool, it is the City of Vancouver. We tripled housing units city-wide. No other centre city did that — an unheard-of achievement.

While this sadly did not make the city more affordable, as we had hoped, it did make the city better. Much better.

How was this 200 percent growth accomplished? By working with residents, not against them. Community planning with local communities was the means to this achievement. Planning with communities was not an impediment, as some now claim. It was the democratic path to a better city.

But sadly it is now obvious that our decades-long effort to encourage the housing market, in the hope that housing would stay affordable, has failed us. Given this evidence, it seems foolish to upzone so aggressively, hoping against hope that, in 30 or 40 years, housing will be more affordable.

Achieving durable affordability much sooner than this requires a major change in direction. We don’t lack housing; we lack affordable housing. Given this fact, we should follow a path that other similar cities have charted — one where the bulk of new housing built is affordable to average wage earners. This can be done by reviving the Vancouver tradition of building non-market housing at scale, largely financed through “land lift” taxes as applied in Yaletown.

Our own internationally famous False Creek South serves as a storied precedent. Service workers to business owners have found homes in that lovely, self-sustaining community.

The pattern is obvious. Reuse it.

Unfortunately, the Villages Plan moves us in exactly the wrong direction. It virtually rules out any form of land value capture tax, based on the mistaken fear that it would raise home prices. It won’t — and it can’t.

A properly designed land-lift tax simply reduces the inflated “land price residual” that now funnels unearned speculative windfalls into private pockets. A properly designed “land lift” tax channels those gains into public benefit — without increasing the price buyers ultimately pay.

I urge you to revise these plans by deeply involving residents from every corner of the city in a highly collaborative, bottom-up, neighbourhood-focused planning process. One that might arrive at much stronger inclusionary zoning requirements.

The people of Vancouver would rally behind such plans — plans that ensure that their sons and daughters, and the workers who keep this city running, can afford to live in the very neighbourhoods they serve and call home.

Do not pass this plan.

Let us turn instead to plans that are sustainable in scale, equitable in outcome, and shaped not for the market alone, but for the people who live and work here.

Yours truly,

Professor Emeritus Patrick M. Condon
University of British Columbia

More voices weigh in on ABC Vancouver’s Villages Plan development proposal

Steve Jedreicich — principal of Vancouver’s SJ Development Ltd., brings over 30 years of local urban planning and real estate consulting experience to the housing discussion —  weighs in on ABC Vancouver’s contentious Villages Plan proposal.

WBN News Vancouver publisher Karalee Greer’s published article on the impact of the Villages Plan development proposal currently before Vancouver City Council, in particular its impact on Vancouver’s Kitsilano neighbourhood. At present, well more than 1000 speakers are set to address the controversial Villages Plan proposal, in meetings that thus far have lasted well into the night at Council.

Randy Helten and Steve Bohus, the good, hard working, dedicated folks behind the informative CityHallWatch website offer a backgrounder on Vancouver’s Villages Plan proposal, suggesting the plan “was born in the USA.” CityHallWatch offers six more Villages Plan articles the site published in the months of June and July. Click on the multi-coloured links below to access the articles.

Yes, there are even more Villages Plan articles available to you.

As is his wont — and thank goodness for that — The Daily Hive’s well-respected, incredibly hard working urban affairs reporter Kenneth Chan, early in July, published a thorough and well-researched article on Vancouver’s Villages Plan proposal.

Well worth a read.

#VanPoli | 2026 Vancouver Mayoral Candidates | We Take No Prisoners | Part 2

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, canadian politics, Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , ,

Stephanie Allen. Along with Kareem Allam, by far our favourite candidate for Mayor of Vancouver, a boots on the ground visionary, a fiscally responsible, well schooled, non-pedantic knows her stuff politico, who possesses much — perhaps unparalleled — insight into how government functions (although we would say she may have met her match in Kareem Allam), and after years of working in British Columbia’s provincial government knows how to implement true change for the better — the real deal Zohran Mamdami running in the current 2026 Vancouver civic election — COPE scored a major coup in landing the absolutely tremendous Stephanie Allen as the municipal party’s standard bearer in the 2026 Vancouver civic election (thank you Shawn Vulliez, COPE’s absolutely brilliant campaign manager, for convincing Ms. Allen to run for the office of Vancouver Mayor)!

Now, you may know Stephanie Allen from her critically important role as Vice-President of BC Housing, or — following the untimely death (from cancer) of VanRamblings’ friend and neighbour, Brenda Prosken, who we first met and worked with at Vancouver City Hall in her role as General Manager of Community Services — when Stephanie Allen stepped up to the plate in 2020 / 2021 to find housing and homes for those who were resident in the Strathcona Park encampment (following on Brenda’s work on the decampment of Oppenheimer Park, when she located housing for all of the encampment’s residents), but there’s more …


A re-imagining of Hogan’s Alley, Vancouver’s first enclave for some of the Vancouver’s early Black Canadian immigrants, located within a T-shaped intersection at what is now the easternmost end of the Dunsmuir and Georgia viaducts — immediately south of Chinatown | Stephanie ALLEN.

Hogan’s Alley, the early 1900s community in and around the Strathcona neighbourhood — framed today by Main Street to the west, Union Street to the north, Jackson Avenue to the east, and Prior Street to the south — where it eventually became the cultural hub of the community, the former neighbourhood known for being home to Nora Hendrix, the grandmother of rock legend Jimi Hendrix, and a cook at Vie’s Chicken and Steak House, a Hogan’s Alley’s culinary institution.

The latter half of the 1960s marked the neighbourhood’s demise, when city blocks of homes and businesses that formed Hogan’s Alley were demolished for the replacement Georgia Viaduct, which itself is set to be demolished later this decade.

And, gosh, who do you think it was who developed the concept of a renewed Hogan’s Alley? Could it be Stephanie ALLEN, COPE’s absolutely tremendous candidate for Mayor of the City of Vancouver? Yep, yep, we believe that is the case.

Time to introduce you to another high profile candidate for Mayor of Our City

William Azaroff. Running for Mayor of Vancouver under the banner of OneCity Vancouver, VanRamblings first met Mr. Azaroff in June 2019 soon after he was appointed CEO of the Brightside Community Homes Foundation (a prominent non-profit in Metro Vancouver), where he leads a team that manages 26 buildings encompassing over 1,100 affordable homes for seniors, families, and persons with disabilities across the Metro Vancouver region.

Recently, the Vancouver & District Labour Council (VDLC) endorsed Mr. Azaroff for Mayor in this year’s Vancouver municipal election, announcing its endorsement on May 20, 2026, while simultaneously urging the Green Party and COPE to reconsider their Mayoral campaigns to consolidate the so-called “progressive” vote.

That night, COPE’s very able (and, dare we say, brilliant) campaign manager, Shawn Vulliez posted a brief note to VanRamblings in which he averred, “There’s a secret meeting going on tonight where, I’m told, One City Vancouver and the VDLC are going to jettison the co-operative agreement reached by OneCity, the Greens and COPE that would have us work together, as we have in the past, where the VDLC is going to formally endorse OneCity.”

As British statesman Benjamin Disraeli observed “in politics, as in love, there is no honour,” pointing to a world where strategy, leverage, and party alignment often take precedence over unbending morality.

As renowned philosopher Hannah Arendt once observed …

“In matters of the heart, the adage “all is fair in love” suggests that strong passions can lead to irrational choices, which I would argue in politics is fundamentally incompatible with logical, rational reasoning. Love requires vulnerability and deep personal investment, while politics often demands strict detachment or ideological pragmatism. When the two collide, devotion to political figures or ideologies can sometimes overshadow the love and respect shared between partners, be they political or lovers.”

VanRamblings is here to say two things …

  • We absolutely and definitively will not support nor endorse William Azaroff as Vancouver’s next Mayor. We believe Mr. Azaroff is Ken Sim redux in casual wear, a bully, a sort of ne’er-do-well, and although better informed and more accomplished than Mayor Ken Sim, in practice is a kind of despicable, self-serving politico, a non-collaborative fellow, with the potential to be an intimidating and coercive oppressor who will bring to Vancouver City Council the same sort of dysfunction and disunity that has proved to be Ken Sim’s stock-in-trade. Read more on our rationale below.
  • At reading the paragraph above, we believe VDLC President Stephen (pronounced “Stefan”) von Zychowski — who we like and respect — will be apoplectic. Soon, we will ask for Mr. von Zychowski’s permission to reprint the statement he has made on social media as to the rationale of the VDLC in choosing to support William Azaroff as our next Mayor, as well as his OneCity Vancouver civic party. Fair’s fair, after all.

On February 12th, Mr. Azaroff defeated First United Church Executive Director Amanda Burrows in OneCity Vancouver’s Mayoral nomination race, securing 1329 votes or 60% of the vote total, with Ms. Burrows coming in second with 929 votes, or 40% of the vote. Nomination battles are always a numbers game.

Upon winning the OneCity Mayoral nomination, did Mr. Azaroff reach out to Ms. Burrows and say …

“You ran a good race, a great race. I learned so much from you as we both sought to secure the OneCity Vancouver Mayoral nomination. I think the success of OneCity in this year’s election demands candidates of quality, discernment and accomplishment, all of which you embody. I believe going forward it is critical you remain on the OneCity team, and that you secure a nomination for Council, which I will heartily endorse. Working together, there is so much good that we can accomplish.”

Did William Azaroff reach out to Amanda Burrows, congratulate her on a well-run campaign, and ask her to join his OneCity Vancouver team to seek a Council nomination, which he would heartily support? Nope, gentleman that he isn’t, he did not approach her. Instead, he left Ms. Burrows to twist in the wind.

Note. Amanda Burrows did not seek a OneCity Council nomination.

From the outset there was very little enthusiasm within COPE (the Coalition of Progressive Electors), for the Mayoral candidacy of William Azaroff, should he secure the OneCity Mayoral nomination.

Even so, in signing a OneCity Vancouver / Greens / COPE co-operative agreement COPE — which was represented by campaign manager, Shawn Vulliez — at the behest of the VDLC, COPE made a commitment to consider backing various of the “progressive” non-COPE candidates should these candidates “pull ahead.”

COPE’s Executive did not want to risk the potentiality of Stephanie Allen’s Mayoral bid should all go well — as was heartily hoped would occur —  given the possibility Ms. Allen might emerge as the successful consensus “progressive” Mayoral choice, thereby garnering support from OneCity, the Greens and the VDLC.

There was to be no ill will expressed, nor acted upon, nor any misunderstanding(s).

COPE conducted itself in an honourable matter.


Derrick O’Keefe, COPE School Board candidate (l), and his activist partner, Andrea Pinochet-Escudero

Why then was there opprobrium among some in COPE for an Azaroff candidacy?

If one reads various social media accounts, and speaks directly with a broad cross-section of COPE’s membership, one learns that many members of COPE have experienced mulish interactions with Mr. Azaroff, such that  he is considered by many COPE members to be the Evictor in Chief in the affordable housing sector, as he displaces vulnerable tenants from their homes.

VanRamblings has covered municipal, provincial and federal elections for 60 years.

In all that time, there is no Mayoral candidate or party leader — federally, provincially or municipally — who did not put his or her imprint on the party they lead, deciding who would constitute members of her or his team going into an election.

For instance, when Kirk LaPointe became the Mayoral nominee for the NPA in 2014, he dismissed all of the vetted candidates for Council, Park Board and School Board — this at the end of a long, arduous and thorough vetting process, when all of the successful candidates were in place, as he secured his own team to run as candidates at all three levels of civic governance, Council, Park Board and School Board.

Did William Azaroff put his imprint on OneCity Vancouver after winning the Mayoral nomination, indicate he believed their star candidate, longtime civic affairs journalist Frances Bula, must be a member of his team, that her nomination for Council would be a critical element in OneCity’s success at the polls in October?

No, he did not.

Can you imagine Mark Carney or David Eby lying back and taking no interest in who would be running for their respective parties in a coming election? In early 2020, longtime NDP Executive Director Raj Sihota had the support of the Vancouver-Hastings constituency executive and the members of the riding, and was their chosen candidate to represent the party in the upcoming election.

Next thing you know, Premier John Horgan — at the insistence of then NDP Attorney General, David Eby — parachuted in former Vancouver Park Board Chair, Niki Sharma, to seek the Vancouver-Hastings NDP nomination, with the full support of the provincial party. Next thing you know, Ms. Sharma secures the Vancouver-Hastings NDP nomination, emerges as the victor in the October 24, 2020 provincial election, shortly after which she was appointed our province’s Attorney-General, when David Eby took on the housing portfolio.

William Azaroff a leader? We think not.

Colleen Hardwick. Yep, she’s running for Mayor again, and doesn’t much of a chance of winning. Think: lost cause.

VanRamblings has written kindly and lovingly about our longtime friend.

But no more.

At a recent luncheon with a weathered confidante of the esteemed Ms. Hardwick, VanRamblings offered the comment …

“Colleen Hardwick can be difficult to get along with.” The rejoinder by our luncheon companion, said with a chuckle in his voice, “Raymond, Raymond, Colleen is not difficult to get along with, she is impossible to get along with.”

We continue to like Ms. Hardwick’s core message: neighbourhood empowerment, and community involvement in the development of new and updated neighbourhood community plans. That she is the only candidate to voice such policy, gets her no little support from us. Sadly, though, Colleen Hardwick is an imperfect messenger for her policy proposals. Speaking with friends we ran across while sauntering down West Broadway, our friend Helen — as we were speaking about the upcoming civic election — offered the following comment, unbidden …

“Colleen is sharp. And I don’t mean that in a kindly way. There is an edge to everything she says, almost an inherent meanness, an ‘I know better than you’ ethos that is off-putting, that causes me to think, ‘I kind of like what she has to say, but I don’t like at all how she goes about saying it’. For me, Colleen is an unpleasant character, and someone who I could not begin to support, no matter how much I like her message.”

Recently, Katie Hyslop, writing in The Tyee, published an article titled, Colleen Hardwick Is Running for Mayor Again. Midway through the article, Ms. Hyslop asked Colleen Hardwick a question about affordable housing, and homelessness.

Have you ever read such utter nonsense in your entire life?

Who, which voters, given a damn about “recovering balance” (whatever the heck that means). Not to mention, who gives, which voters and where are they, give a flying f-ck about “zone capacity” or the ” 2012 Coriolis report”?

We mean, really?

Who does Colleen Hardwick — running for Mayor again, don’tcha know — think her audience is, who are the voters — outside of pointy-headed, so called “intellectuals” at the universities in our region — is she attempting to communicate with, to garner their support, that she’s the right candidate to become the Mayor of Vancouver in 2026, that she can “recover balance” and change “zone capacity”?

Colleen Hardwick might well have said …

“Affordable housing must be addressed through the construction of housing co-operatives, where members pay no more than 30% of their income for their homes, where they are empowered to make decision-making on the Co-op’s finance, membership or maintenance committees. Where housing co-ops are built on a 99-year-leasehold basis, on city-owned land, or provincial or federal Crown land. Construction and materials are paid for through the Community Amenity Contributions made by developers building high rise condominiums. All this would be overseen by Thom Armstrong, who heads both the Co-operative Housing Federation of British Columbia, and the Community Land Trust. On top of that, the City would charge no development fees for the construction of this crucial affordable housing, saving millions.”

Or, in addressing the issue of homelessness, Ms. Hardwick could have reminded readers of the 2022 platform for TEAM for a Livable Vancouver, when she stated …

“There are 277 social agencies on the Downtown Eastside, located in the square mile around Hastings and Main. 277 very well-paid Executive Directors, Vice-Presidents, Directors of Human Resources, Property Managers, Directors of Supportive Housing, and more, staffed in each of these agencies, who engage in redundant work each and every day, putting money in their pocket at the expense of the vulnerable citizens they are charged to support. No wonder that for years, many in the community have called those who are employed by these agencies “poverty pimps”. Merge these agencies, leaving 40 agencies. TEAM wants to hire a “czar” — as David Eby has often said is the key to provide service to our city’s most vulnerable citizens, rather than line the pockets of the senior administrators. Billions of dollars could be saved, services rationalized, better service could be provided with savings applied to social housing construction.”

But did she say that, did she actually answer the question that was asked of her, in plain and simple language that all of us could understand? Could have been a great answer to a simple question. But Ms. Hardwick seems not capable of that.

Y’know, Ms. Hardwick, not every voter is a PhD candidate, as you are, or grew up with a silver spoon in their mouth, living in a home where their parents are a respected, tenured professor at the University of British Columbia, and their mother sat on the Vancouver Park Board as a multi-term Commissioner.

According to Statistics Canada, the “average level” of education in Vancouver-Point Grey / Vancouver Quadra is second year university. East of Main Street, the “average level” of education is Grade 8. There are 54 ethnic communities in Vancouver where the first language spoken in the home is neither French nor English. No wonder in Vancouver, there’s a paltry 36% turnout of eligible voters — if that — when a Vancouver City election is called every four years.

Fortunately, there’s a Mayoral candidate — and a couple of civic parties — in the current Vancouver City municipal election who are running a stealth campaign to get the vote out among people in those 54 under-represented communities who don’t go to the polls — but will in 2026 — when it comes time to cast their ballot for a new Mayor, a new and vibrant Vancouver City Council, and a grassroots, community-oriented Vancouver Park Board, and Vancouver Board of Education.

And we’re here to tell you, folks, that it ain’t Mayoral aspirant Colleen Hardwick, and her gang of well-meaning, and perhaps, under qualified candidate TEAM.

Muhammad Ahmad. VanRamblings predicts that Mr. Ahmad, and his recently created, AI generated (according to a friend of ours who has spoken with Mr. Ahmad) Bright Futures Vancouver municipal party will secure less than 2% of the vote come the evening of Saturday, October 17th. Chances are, though, that you are likely going to see Mr. Ahmad on at least some of the stages where Mayoral all-candidates meetings are being held, on various dates throughout September and October.

Part 1 of the column on current Vancouver Mayoral aspirants may be found here.
.

Now, we’re going to say this again and again: there is no more honourable activity than offering yourself for public office, as a serious and well-experienced candidate with a vision, and a more than passing familiarity with civic governance, and how our city is run, who the important administrative staff at Vancouver City Hall are and what it is they do, that you’ve attended a surfeit of Vancouver City Council meetings, or if you’re running to become one of the nine elected trustees on Vancouver’s Board of Education (who are elected to office every four years) that you are a regular attendee at School Board meetings and have been for years, or if you’re running to become a Vancouver Park Board Commissioner that you’ve done your homework, that you have a OneCard stuffed in your wallet, your purse, or your shirt or blouse pocket, and know almost everything there is to know not just about Park Board governance but about Vancouver’s many community centres — where it is critical that you are a member of your local community recreation centre and make regular use of the facility, which is kind of a second home for you.

See you back here tomorrow, when we write about the recently concluded 79th annual Cannes Film Festival, which for years has acted as a predictor as to which films will emerge as Oscar contenders the following January, as was the case with the Grand Prix winner at Cannes in 2025, Sentimental Value, or Best Actor Oscar contender Wagner Moura, who won the Best Actor award at the 78th Cannes Film Festival in 2025 for his role as a dissident on the run in the political thriller The Secret Agent (directed by Kleber Mendonça Filho), among a host of others, not the least of whom was the Best Supporting Actor Oscar winner, Stellan Skarsgård, for his role as an acclaimed filmmaker and absent father, in Sentimental Value.

#VanPoli | 2026 Vancouver Mayoral Candidates | We Take No Prisoners | Part 1

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, Politics, Pop Culture, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026

Kareem Allam. Who? You may not know the achingly bright Kareem Allam four months out today from the October 17th Vancouver municipal election. But by early October, when the advance polls open, you will, and we’re betting that you will cast your ballot for Kareem, and members of his Vancouver Liberals team. Kareem is the most well-schooled candidate to ever run for the Mayor’s office in the City of Vancouver, with the strongest and most well thought out and expansive policy platform of any of the candidates and parties seeking office in the 2026 Vancouver municipal election. In a word, Kareem is brilliant, Vancouver’s Zohran Mamdami, a charismatic and populist candidate, articulate, and collaborative.

In the coming months, VanRamblings will introduce you more thoroughly to this outstanding candidate for Mayor of our city, why it is we are enthusiastically supporting his candidacy, and why it is we believe far and away that he is the most qualified candidate for Mayor, seeking office in the 2026 Vancouver civic election.

Ken Sim. Not since the reign of error of Mayor Jack Volrich in the late 1970s, has Vancouver had a more inept, more morally corrupt, shambolic clusterfuck of a civic administration than has proved to be the case under the maladministration of the far too often absent and woefully under qualified Ken Sim, the occupant of the Mayor’s office in the City of Vancouver for most of the past four years.

Jettisoning the Fair Wage Programme at City Hall early on in his administration; shutting down the Rentals Office at City Hall; attempting to get rid of the City’s Integrity Commissioner even while he was under investigation; converting a Committee Room used by several of City Hall’s 33 Advisory Committees, in order that he could convert the meeting room into a personal gym for himself; shot gunning a flagon of beer from the stage at Khatsalano Days, which he attended early on in his administration, causing the children and parents who were present to recoil, aghast at Sim’s utter lack of judgement; attending meetings dressed in a T-shirt and sweat pants, when he bothered to turn up to vote at all (on the rare occasions when he deigned to participate in the decision-making at City Hall); vacationing with his billionaire friends at resort locales across the globe; championing gang and drug-related cryptocurrency to finance civic government; and perhaps worst of all — attacking City Councillors, as he filed one unfounded formal complaint after another on then OneCity Vancouver City Councillor Christine Boyle, now our province’s Minister of Municipal Affairs, while later on in his administration going on the attack in the most despicable manner possible against the honourable and incredibly hard working COPE City Councillor Sean Orr (who topped the polls in the 2025 Vancouver City by-election, who has emerged as the conscience of Vancouver’s civic administration), calling him a drug dealer in the Chinese press, for which untoward act he was officially sanctioned by the City of Vancouver’s Integrity Commissioner for his harmful and utterly spurious allegation.

The internal party polls conducted by various of Vancouver’s civic parties show Ken Sim and his ABC Vancouver administration languishing around the 10% mark. Ken Sim is on his way out, as are most of his lickspittle  ABC City Councillors.

For VanRamblings, that can’t happen soon enough.

Pete Fry. Serving the public as a Vancouver City Councillor since first being elected to office under the Green Party of Vancouver banner on October 20 2018, Councillor Pete Fry has served the office with honour, integrity and distinction.

In a recent conversation with the distinguished Councillor Fry, our favourite City Councillor told VanRamblings how challenging this past term has proved to be under the bullying (VanRamblings’ word, not Pete’s) administration of Mayor Ken Sim. Vancouverites should thank our lucky stars that Pete Fry has emerged as an incredibly effective, if un-official, opposition to the morally bankrupt  ABC Vancouver civic administration under Mayor Ken Sim, as an empathetic and informed voice of reason, who has consistently well-represented the interests of not only those of us who twice elected him to office, but for all the citizens who call Vancouver home. On that front, Councillor Pete Fry is deserving of our support, and unending admiration for a necessary job well done. Thank you Councillor Fry!

Why, then, has VanRamblings chosen to support Kareem Allam as Vancouver’s next Mayor, over the accomplished and hard working Pete Fry? Well, partly because we believe Kareem Allam to be brilliant, and a gift to our city, with the potential to be the best Mayor our city has ever experienced. Kareem is well-funded, organized, experienced, has worked at the federal, provincial and civic levels of government, and is the best informed politico we have ever met, and interacted with. As we say, Pete Fry has consistently proved to be an admirable Vancouver City Councillor, deserving of our support — but, as a City Councillor (we believe that Pete will drop down to run for Council come early September), not Mayor.

Pete has said, on various stages, in the media, and on social platforms …

“It is the people of Vancouver, the citizens, the electorate, who will choose the next Mayor of Vancouver, and who will be elected to the next civic administration. Not me, not you, not any of the candidates seeking office in 2026 — but the citizens of our City who call Vancouver home. The wisdom of the citizens of Vancouver will carry the day. On Saturday, October 17th, on Election Night 2026, we will know which candidates have emerged as successful in their bid for civic office, who will form civic government, in keeping with the wishes, and the wisdom, of the electorate.”

And so it is, and so it will be. VanRamblings wishes Pete well in his endeavours.


The video is a year old, but at least it explicates Ms. Bligh’s intention to seek the Mayor’s chair

Rebecca Bligh. Running with her newly formed party, Vote Vancouver, Ms. Bligh was first elected to Vancouver City Council in 2018 under the banner of the Non-Partisan Association (NPA). Ms. Bligh and two of her NPA colleagues chose to leave the NPA following a right-wing takeover of Vancouver’s oldest civic party — formed in 1937 to oppose the CCF / the left-wing “progressive” forces.

In 2022, Ms. Bligh joined a new, nascent civic party, ABC Vancouver, where she sat as a Councillor before being expelled from that party on Valentine’s Day, 2025.

Now, we will say we really like Rebecca, and that her partner Laura is the first person in 50 years who has VanRamblings’ number — she keeps us in line — and is not about to let us get away with any nonsense. We love being called out by people we know care about us, as misguided as we may be from time to time.

Here’s a little of what Ms. Bligh’s LinkedIn profile has to say about the esteemed Councillor ..

“Since 2018, Rebecca Bligh has acted as a director for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, serving currently as Chair of Governance, as well as the Chair of the Standing Committee on Finance with the City of Vancouver.

Outside of politics, Ms. Bligh is the founder of BLACKPiiN a consulting and facilitation practice providing leadership development to executives and teams, working with them to define, develop and implement strategies to enable success by uncovering how their leadership can achieve their desired results.

Passionate about giving back to her community, Rebecca has volunteered on boards and supported initiatives that give back to community; including recently established, Let’s Eat, and prior to 2018 the Dr. Peter AIDS Foundation and Legado Initiatives, providing training and development in Ethiopia and Mozambique.”

In fact, Ms. Bligh served as President of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) from late 2024, concluding her extended term (she was to have served only through June 2025) in late May of this year. During her tenure, Ms. Bligh functioned as the Chief National Advocate for Canadian municipalities, overseeing critical policy initiatives focused on the housing crisis, the poisoned drug epidemic, climate change, and community safety. All of which is to say that Ms. Bligh has the bona fides (and then some) to serve well as the City of Vancouver’s next Mayor.

Whether it is Rebecca Bligh, Pete Fry or Kareem Allam who you choose to cast a ballot for come October of this year, each of these three individuals we write about today would make a fine Mayor of our beloved city by the ocean.

On Thursday, we will write about four more relatively high profile aspirants to become the next Mayor of Vancouver, only one of whom we will recommend.

 

Vancouver Liberals, Building a Civic Party Destined to Govern

#VanElxn 2026, #VanPoli Civic Politics, BC Politics, canadian politics, Politics, Vancouver, Vancouver Votes 2026, , , , ,

Yesterday, VanRamblings received the following e-mail from our friend and neighbour Catherine Evans — founding member and soon-to-be Vice-President of the Vancouver Liberals, multi-year Chairperson of the Vancouver Public Library Board of Directors, dedicated Vancouver Park Board Commissioner, David Eby’s appointed liaison with Vancouver City Hall on Mayor Ken Sim’s proposal to dissolve an elected Vancouver Park Board (a hateful job she told VanRamblings, also telling us she’d lost a number of friends arising from her appointment by David, to whom she is loyal), and multi-year senior constituency assistant in federal Liberal Minister of the Crown Joyce Murray’s office (where she did much good for many many people) and now, as we say above, a founding member, and soon-to-be Vice-President of, Kareem Allam’s upstart Vancouver Liberals municipal party, as the party — VanRamblings predicts — rolls to victory at the polls next year.

Here’s what Catherine wrote to us — and many many others — yesterday …

This week we learned that Vancouver City Hall will pay out $800,000 in severance to the separated former City Manager, Paul Mochrie.

This is simply OUTRAGEOUS. An $800,000 payment on Ken Sim and ABC Vancouver’s watch is unacceptable.

We have to put an end to these golden parachutes at Vancouver City Hall.

Did Ken Sim and ABC make the decision to fire the city manager? We don’t know.

Did they approve this $800,000 payment to bring in a new city manager who will follow their directions? Again – unclear.

But one thing is for sure: this is $800,000 that is being taken away from front-line programmes like cleaning up our streets, cracking down on money laundering, and enhancing community centre programmes.

It’s not surprising Ken Sim didn’t bat an eye at an $800,000 severance payment. After all, he tried to fire the city Integrity Commissioner while he was under investigation.

This culture of entitlement at Vancouver City Hall must end.

When you elect a Vancouver Liberal council in 2026, you can be sure it will.

We need to fix City Hall — and that starts with defeating Ken Sim and his ABC Council, when voters go to the polls next year for Vancouver’s 42nd civic election.

Join the Vancouver Liberals team today.

Thank you,

Catherine Evans
Founding Member, Vancouver Liberals