The History of Musicals | Capturing the Magic of the Stage on the Screen

Movie musicals are often a polarizing topic.

People either love them or hate them, and even those that love them are critical of on-screen adaptations of their favourite stage shows.

In recent years, Hollywood hasn’t had a great track record of adapting musicals from the stage to the screen in a way that works, and many movie musicals in past years have been criticized for not having that certain something that makes the onstage musicals feel so special and unique.

That was the case until three years ago, 2021, which apparently became the year when Hollywood figured out how to make a good movie musical.

As the musicals that were made that year were, sadly, not big box office hits, nor successful streaming, movie musicals have once again faded from our screens, both in our local multiplex, and on Netflix and other streaming platforms.

Still and all, if you love musicals, you can still take heart with the rich and glorious history of the musical, in whatever form it has taken cinematically.

Regardless of their box office success, there were there a great many 2021 musicals that were Oscar nominated — In The Heights, Dear Evan Hansen, tick, tick…BOOM!, West Side Story, and even Encanto (which wasn’t derived from a stage play). For the most part, they were well executed, and loved by critics, if not by a mass, anticipatory audience.

For the past century, the Hollywood musical has been recognized as a distinguished part of our movie history, playing an integral role in the evolution of movies during the 1920s through 1950s, til now.

It wasn’t until 1927 that Warner Brothers first introduced to the big screen singing along with sound in their release of The Jazz Singer; a remake of the Broadway musical of the same name.

The late 1920s brought difficult economic times, and a worldwide Depression.

It was during this time that Hollywood came to the public’s rescue with the dynamically entertaining diversion of the Hollywood musical.

Hollywood studios began to release a plethora of musicals which offered the movie-going public a chance to temporarily escape from the dire economic issues that had the world in its grip.

In the 1930s, with Warner Brothers’ acquisition of choreographer Busby Berkeley, the musical genre was truly born with the release of popular musicals like 42nd Street, Bright Lights, and Gold Diggers.

Capping the decade was 1939’s The Wizard of Oz, still one of the classic musicals that continues to entertain audiences today.

It was during the 1940s that the Hollywood musical really came of age, and the popularity of the movie musical continued right through the 1950s.

One of the more popular 1940s musicals was Yankee Doodle Dandy, a film that introduced movie lovers to a young James Cagney who gave a performance that earned him an Oscar. Another popular 1940s title, long a holiday tradition, is The Bells of St. Mary’s.

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer embraced old-fashioned musical films in the ’40s and ’50s, furthering the boundaries of the musicals, with stars like Judy Garland, Fred Astaire and Mickey Rooney leading the way.

Starting with Meet Me in St. Louis (Vincent Minnelli, 1944), MGM began producing some of the most popular films of the era, including Easter Parade (Walters, 1948), An American in Paris (Minnelli, 1951), and Singin’ in the Rain (Kelly and Donen, 1952).

Marilyn Monroe brought a new element to the musical movie during the 1950’s.

This was also the time to bring Broadway to film in movies such as Oklahoma! and Guys and Dolls.

Elvis also started to make the big screen his home, which many believe signalled the beginning of the end for the genre.

Through the 1960s, though, the adaptation of stage material for the screen remained a predominant trend in Hollywood. West Side Story, My Fair Lady, The Sound of Music, and Oliver! were all adapted from Broadway hits and each won the Academy Award for Best Picture.

The genre changed slightly during the 1970’s, where in some cases, such as Saturday Night Fever and Tommy, the stars were not the singers. The movie plot was being driven by song, but in a pre-recorded way.

There were a few musicals to note in the ’80s, like Annie and Purple Rain, but for the most part, the entire genre had changed to musicians supplying the music.

With the arrival of the early 1990s, one of the more successful modern-day musical movements emerged: Disney’s animated musical blockbusters, including such films as The Little Mermaid, Aladdin and The Lion King, all released in rapid succession, amassing an enormous fan base along the way.

In 2000, let us not forget the Coen Brothers’ O Brother, Where Are Thou?

Although the animated musical film has become a popular route for the genre in recent years, the success of musicals like Chicago, Rent, Sweeney Todd, and Les Misérables seems to indicate that large scale, live action musical productions are still very much relevant to film today.

In 2006: John Carney’s début film, Once, with Glen Hansard and Markéta Irglová.

In 2017, three musicals were nominated for Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy at the Golden Globes: Florence Foster Jenkins, La La Land, and Sing Street, with La La Land taking home the award (well, sort of).

Although musicals might not necessarily find success in terms of receiving the most awards recognition, they are nonetheless popular and enjoyed by audiences.

Once upon a time, huge, spectacle musicals were the backbone of Hollywood.

The pandemic year of 2021 offered Hollywood a chance to return to the glory days of the 1930s Depression era musical, allowing audiences to reacquire a taste for the musical, to help lift of us out of the malaise that had us in its grip.

The Hollywood musical has always offered viewers a page out of movie history, memories that will forever be captured on film, and musical films that will continue to be enjoyed by audiences around the world.

 

#VanPoli | The Parlous State of Politics in Our Little Burgh by the Sea


Sam Sullivan, one-term Mayor of Vancouver, 2005 – 2008

On Friday, June 29, 2006, without prior notice, Non-Partisan Association Mayor of Vancouver Sam Sullivan fired all the members of the Board of Variance.

The announcement firing all five members of the Board was made late on the Friday afternoon, in a press release emanating from the Mayor’s office.

The decision to fire the five members of the Board of Variance was contrary to the advice of former Non-Partisan Association Councillor George Puil, who the Mayor and NPA Councillor Peter Ladner had called in to “investigate” the Board, with Mr. Puil reporting back following his exhaustive six month investigation of the Board.

In his report to the Mayor and Councillor Ladner, Mr. Puil told Mayor Sam Sullivan and Councillor Peter Ladner that he had found no wrong-doing on the part of the Board of Variance members and, in fact, in his discussion with dozens of citizens of the community who had appeared before the Board with their appeal of a decision of the City of Vancouver’s Development Services and Planning Departments — citizens ranging from homeowners and members of the community, to developers — they had found the Board to be a fair and thoughftul body, adjudicating the appeals that were brought before the Board with a seriousness of purpose and intent.

Mr. Puil strongly advised Mayor Sullivan and Mr. Ladner against firing the Board.

“Let them finish out their term,” Mr. Puil advised. “The terms of Board members Terry Martin and Jan Pierce will end later this year or early next, with Raymond Tomlin’s term to be completed not too long after, with Quincey Kirschner and Tony Tang’s tenure on the Board to be completed before the next election.

Allow the current members of the Board of Variance to finish out their terms,” Mr. Puil intoned, “and replace them with stalwart members of the NPA to three-year terms on the Board, and should Vision Vancouver gain victory at the polls in 2008, our people will be in place on the Board, which means, we win.


Peter Ladner, Non-Partisan Association Vancouver City Councillor, 2008, NPA Mayoralty candidate

NPA Councillor Peter Ladner maintained the members of the Board were fired because they had “refused to bring legal and administrative spending under control,” to which accusation fired Board Chairperson Terry Martin responded …

“Legal and administrative fees were never discussed with city officials. In fact, the Board had cut its administrative costs by $8,500,” said Mr. Martin, in an interview with CBC Vancouver.

At 6pm on the Friday evening, each of four of the members of the Board of Variance — Terry Martin, Jan Pierce, Raymond Tomlin and Tony Tang — received a hand-delivered letter from the City advising them of the termination of their work on the City’s Board of Variance. Board member Quincey Kirschner (pictured above), 27, had moved recently, and did not receive the letter of termination. Ms. Kirschner was otherwise unavailable on the Friday night. Raymond Tomlin was assigned the task of calling Ms. Kirschner on Saturday morning to advise her of the termination of her work on the Board of Variance.

When contacted on the Saturday morning at 9 a.m., still in bed and groggy, after a night out on the town, Ms. Kirschner was informed by Mr. Tomlin of her “sacking” (as it was referred to in the press).

Ms. Kirschner cried for an extended period of time, and was inconsolable.

Ms. Kirschner had poured her life blood, her passion, her integrity and immense dedication into her work on Vancouver’s Board of Variance, following her appointment as a Board member in late 2005, spending hours each week pouring over the six-inch thick binders Board members received each Thursday or Friday afternoon, and informing herself of the intricacies of development, planning, zoning and community consultation on planning and development and decisions.

Background and history. In the 1950s, by an order of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts, Boards of Variance were created in all communities across the North American continent, communites with 10,000 or more citizens, as independent, lay bodies, protective of and advocates for the community interest, these lay bodies responsible for overseeing all development in the city that did not conform with City zoning bylaws, or in the case of new construction were overheight, lacked the property frontage, where shadowing impinged on a neighbour’s property, or were not otherwise outright approvals of the City’s Planning and Development Services departments — ranging from simple home renovations, to the construction of high-rise towers in their communities, the Board of Variance responsible for hearing appeals from the public on all such related matters.

The arrogance displayed by Mayor Sam Sullivan in his unprecented firing of the members of the Board of Variance, and other matters of misjudgment eventually led to internal dissension in the majority Non-Partisan Association caucus on Vancouver City Council, which in 2008 resulted in Mr. Sullivan being denied the opportunity  to run for re-election that year. Councillor Peter Ladner was chosen as the Non-Partisan Association Mayoral candidate, instead, in 2008.

On November 15, 2008, the Non-Partisan Association was all but wiped out at the polls, losing the Mayor’s chair and four seats on Council, losing to novice Vision Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson by nearly 20,000 votes, Vision Vancouver securing seven Council seats, giving the party a “super majority” on Vancouver City Council, allowing them to pass budgets and conduct the affairs of government without input from the three-member (two COPE, David Cadman, and Ellen Woodsworth; one NPA, Suzanne Anton) opposition on Vancouver City Council.


There is a correlation between one-term Non-Partisan Association Mayor Sam Sullivan, and current and certain-to-be one -term ABC Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim, a topic VanRamblings will explore in depth this upcoming Monday, February 12th.

#CdnPoli | Curse of Politics #Cdn Politics Blasphemed

Today, VanRamblings leaves you in the capable hands of …

  • David Herle, host of the Curse of Politics podcast, longtime Liberal strategist and pollster, frequent CBC News commentator, principal in the Gandalf Research Group, and in 2013 Ontario Liberal Party campaign manager in that year’s election, which afforded Kathleen Wynne a come-from-behind victory, electing her as Premier;
  • Scott Reid, Director of Communications for former Prime Minister Paul Martin, and current CTVNews’ political commentator — both Mr. Herle and Mr. Reid proudly successful 40-year veterans of federal (and provincial) Liberal politics;
  • Kory Teneycke, former Director of Communications in Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office, and 2018 campaign manager for Doug Ford’s Ontario Progressive Conservative Party during that year’s election, which elected Mr.  Ford Premier; and
  • Jordan Leichnitz, an NDP stalwart, longtime progressive political strategist who worked for over a decade in the offices of former federal NDP leader, Jack Layton, and current NDP leader Jagmeet Singh,  and CBC Power & Politics commentator.

The four Curse of Politics panelists discuss the state and nature of federal politics in Canada, providing delightfully profane insight into what the heck is going in Canadian federal politics, the issues of the week, and more, much much more.


The Curse of Politics is also available as an Apple, Android and Spotify podcast.

#VanPoli | ABC Vancouver Popularity Plummets, OneCity + Greens Rise

In the 2022 Vancouver municipal election, the upstart ABC Vancouver civic party — a creation of founder / financier Peter Armstrong — came out of nowhere to secure an overwhelming victory at the polls, securing 34.5% of the vote, with the Greens trailing at 11.24%, and OneCity Vancouver managing 9.79% in voter popularity.

How ABC Vancouver’s fortunes have changed only 15 turbulent months later.


Saturday, October 15, 2022 | ABC Vancouver wins the Mayor’s chair, electing eight City Councillors

Let us count the ways in which ABC Vancouver has lost popularity with the public.

  • ABC Vancouver’s first budget raised property taxes by a whopping, unprecedented 10.7% (triple that for small business), alienating huge portions of the public;
  • ABC Vancouver jettisoned the City’s Livable Wage Programme, which pays the employees of suppliers of goods and services to the city approximately $24-an-hour;
  • ABC Vancouver shuttered the City’s Rental Office, telling the public that the monies it took to run the Rental Office would be transferred to TRAC, the Tenant Resources and Advisory Centre, and would move TRAC into new offices on Howe Street downtown.

    Surprise
    , surprise, TRAC has not moved into the new offices that had been promised, which three years on remains under construction, and in addition, has yet to receive one red cent from the City. You gotta love “conservatives”: they lie like we breathe;
  • On December 13, 2023,  Vancouver’s rookie Mayor, Ken Sim, announced that his ABC Vancouver City Council would abolish the cherished 135-year-old Vancouver Park Board,  with an application to the province to change the Vancouver Charter to facilitate an undemocratic, unmandated, appalling change in City governance.

In 2022, a paltry 36.3% of eligible voters turned out at the polls to elect a new Vancouver City Council, School Board and Park Board — which means that the vast majority of Vancouver voters … 63.7% … stayed home, and couldn’t be bothered to, either, inform themselves of the issues in the last Vancouver municipal election, or take an hour or less to attend at their local polling station to cast their ballot.


Global BC newscasters Chris Gailus and Sophie Liu host B.C.’s top-rated suppertime news programme

Numeris (formerly the Bureau of Broadcast Measurement) is Canada’s audience measurement organization, tracks our country’s highly fragmented and increasingly complex media landscape, as it attempts to bring clarity and an understanding of audience behaviours and insights to an evolving cross-media landscape.

According to Numeris, only 18% of British Columbians tune in to watch news programmes on Global BC, CTV Vancouver, CBC Vancouver and CityNews, and their local affiliates’ news programmes. Where, then, do British Columbians get their news, if 82% of B.C. adults don’t get their news from television news programmes?

Newspapers remain a popular deliverer of the news for people age 35 and older.

The findings of a study held in Canada between October 2022 and September 2023 revealed that 32% of Canadians only read print newspapers on a weekly basis, whereas 6% read newspapers via computer only. For those persons between the ages of 35 and 49 across all regions in Canada, only 23.89% of persons in that age bracket read, watch or listen to the news once a week or more.

A growing number of people selectively avoid news stories, such as the war between Israel and Gaza, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the cost-of-living issue.

Thirty-eight per cent of those surveyed actively avoid the news, up from 29% in 2021, according to the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Around 36% — particularly those under age 35 — say that the news lowers their mood.

“Large numbers of people see the media as subject to undue political influence, and only a small minority believe most news organizations put what’s best for society ahead of their own commercial interest,” writes Reuters Institute Director Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, in a Reuters report based on an online survey of 93,432 people, conducted in 46 markets across Canada.


Gen Z (1997-2012) and Millennials (1980-1996) acquire news, predominately, from their Tik Tok app

Younger audiences, those under 45, are increasingly accessing the news via platforms such as TikTok, or from their friends, and have a weak connection to online or conventional media. Forty percent of that age group uses TikTok daily, with 15% saying they use it to find, discuss or share news.

What is the context and meaning of the preceding information, and its impact on Vancouver politics, the current fight to preserve Vancouver’s Board of Parks and Recreation, and the re-election chances of ABC Vancouver come 2026?

Where Vision Vancouver’s success in their ten years at the helm of politics in Vancouver was dependent on three groups who consistently turned out in droves to support the party at election time …

  • Unions. Vision Vancouver set the wage scale agenda during their time in power,  not just locally, but in municipalities across British Columbia and beyond, in the public sector where it moved the provincial government off its 1-1-1 agenda, and by extension in the private sector, the union vote in the City of Vancouver, loyal and consistently good for 45,000 votes at the polls in strong support for Vision Vancouver;
  • The active transportation lobby (think: Hub Cycling), who are committed to bike lanes and a healthy, environmentally friendly and livable city, with fit, cycling Millennials turning out in droves to re-elect Vision Vancouver at election time; and …
  • The 2SLGBTQIA community, whose support Vision Vancouver worked tirelessly to gain and maintain, and for whom it could depend on at least 20,000 votes at the polls — as was the case with the bike lobby — in the 2008, 2011 and 2014 civic elections.

ABC Vancouver has no natural constituency in our decidedly progressive, left-of-centre, NDP-voting city on the far shores of western Canada.

The 2022 Vancouver municipal election was a “kick the bums out” election, with dismayed, disgruntled and disquieted Vancouverites sick-and-tired of a lazy, do-nothing, whiny Kennedy Stewart administration, which had non-productive relations provincially with John Horgan’s NDP government, federally with Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party of Canada, and in 2022 with the Vancouver electorate.

As we say, ABC has no natural constituency in the voting Vancouver electorate, their election to civic government in 2022 a blip on the political radar, and consequent from a dissatisfaction among the electorate with the previous administration, a well-run campaign by master electoral tactician and motivator, Kareem Mahmoud Abbas Allam, and bucketfuls of money from Rocky Mountaineer tourism founder Peter Armstrong, and Lululemon lifestyle founding promoter, Chip Wilson.

Well, Mr. Allam is gone now — having pulled away from ABC Vancouver one year ago —  the powers that be at The Vancouver Club and Terminal City out for blood and set to do all in their power to oppose the re-election of Ken Sim and company, not to mention a significant and engaged majority of the 36.3% of Vancouver voters who turned up at the polls in 2022 also out for blood, alienated beyond all measure with the autocratic, anti-democratic administration of Ken Sim and his crew of “we’ll go along to get along, and do whateverABC Vancouver lickspittles.

The Sword of Damocles hangs ominously and precariously over the heads of the “certain to be one term” ABC Vancouver administration at Vancouver City Hall, the arbitrary and unilateral move to eliminate Vancouver’s cherished Park Board — which over the past 135 years has given the citizens of our province a world class parks and recreation system — the final straw, as engaged Vancouverites in high dudgeon, certain to work towards not the elimination of the Vancouver Park Board, but the elimination of the “they know the cost of everything, and the value of nothing” ABC Vancouver civic party from the political landscape of our city.