Iraqi detainees walk through shower runoff water while being transferred between compounds
at the Abu Ghraib Prison on the outskirts of Baghdad, today. Soldiers said that many of the
detainees have become sick because of the unhygenic conditions, but within the next week,
they are scheduled to be moved into a new and improved facility within the prison compound.

The CBS newsmagazine 60 Minutes II (8 p.m. Wednesday) has obtained the video diary of a soldier talking about conditions at Camp Bucca and Abu Ghraib in Iraq, where Iraqi prisoners are currently being held.
It was “60 Minutes II” that first aired pictures two weeks ago of prisoners being abused at Abu Ghraib, igniting a political firestorm.
“We’ve already had two prisoners die … but who cares?” the soldier says on the tape. “That’s two less for me to worry about.” The tape reflects the soldier’s ‘dislike’ for the prison camp and the prisoners, according to CBS.
“I hate it here,” she says. “I want to come home. I want to be a civilian again. We actually shot two prisoners today. One got shot in the chest for swinging a pole against our people on the feed team. One got shot in the arm. We don’t know if the one we shot in the chest is dead yet.”

Lyin’ bastard: “It’s a stain on our country’s honor and our country’s reputation.” — President George W. Bush on war prisoner abuse.

The misery of Iraqi men and women — both within and outside of the prison system — continues at the hands of the U.S. occupation forces, and all President Bush can do is tell the world that his Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, is a great man who defends the interests of the American people.
And, even in the face of the photos of Iraqi prisoner abuse which have been all over the media for the past week; a visceral attack on the Bush administration by former counterrorism director Richard A. Clarke, just six weeks ago; chaos and internecine warfare occurring within the senior ranks of the White House; and even as the U.S., and the world, braces itself for new disturbing accounts of Iraqi prisoner abuse, a full 46 per cent of the American people support their President, and the job he is doing.
Maybe the following revelations will cause a few among those 46% to reconsider their opinion of Bush.
From Talk Left: Sydney Australia’s Indy Media has photos allegedly depicting Iraqi women being raped by U.S. Military Intelligence personnel and private U.S. mercenaries in military fatigues.
Update: Although VanRamblings took down the photos alleging rape of Iraqi women by U.S. forces earlier this month, as we are no longer certain that the photos are not, in fact, real, the photos have been reposted. We would ask that you read the note at the top of the photo linking page.

COURT-MARSHALL: Lieut. Calley was convicted in 1971 for murder at
My Lai in the last high-profile court-martial of an American soldier.

According to a story published in the New York Times, the father of Ivan Frederick, one of the prison guards now charged with Iraqi prisoner abuse, fearful that his son would be a scapegoated, contacted his brother-in law, William Lawson, who contacted “retired Colonel and muckraker David Hackworth,” who put the father in touch with the ‘60 Minutes II’ producers.

The irony, Mr. Lawson said, is that the public spectacle might have been avoided if the military and the federal government had been responsive to his claims that his nephew was simply following orders. Mr. Lawson said he sent letters to 17 members of Congress about the case earlier this year, with virtually no response, and that he ultimately contacted Mr. Hackworth’s Web site out of frustration, leading him to cooperate with a consultant for “60 Minutes II.”

60 Minutes II says: “We heard about someone who was outraged about it and thought that the public should know about it.”
And as has been reported througout the weekend, reports indicate that there’s more to come: “Officials said that the photographs showing psychological or physical abuse numbered in the hundreds, perhaps more than 1,000, with Mr. Rumsfeld hinting Friday that more may come out.”

DREAM TEAM: President Bush speaks to the press about establishing an
independent investigation into intelligence failures in Iraq on February 2,
2004 in Washington, D.C. Bush is surrounded from left to right, Secretary of
State Colin Powell and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Up until the beginning of last week, the Bush administration pretty much had its way with the American media. Whatever policy position President Bush enunciated to the American public through the press, whatever spin on events the White House promoted on any given event, was pretty much reported verbatim — without comment, philosophical reflection, or investigation as to the veracity of the information — by the American press and was printed, or broadcast, untrammeled, and edited in such as way as to preserve the imperial nature of the Presidency.
No more.
With the publication, last Monday, of the Abu Ghraib pictures of Iraqi prisoners being tortured by American troops internecine warfare began to break out in the once closed ranks of the Bush administration.
In the latest issue of Time, the magazine’s Washington-based reporters report that those who surround Bush are finding it increasingly difficult to present a positive message, as finger-pointing has taken the place of “keeping on message.”

Top Bush officials griped about what one called Rumsfeld’s “destructive arrogance.” Says the adviser: “You have no idea what it’s like to deal with the United States of Rumsfeld.” Colin Powell’s closest aides, like chief of staff Larry Wilkerson, were quoted in GQ magazine, saying that Powell was weary of fighting ideological “utopians” in the Administration and being forced to do “damage control” and “apologizing around the world.” Powell’s foes, perhaps in retaliation, blamed him for being slow to decide to travel to the Middle East to help quell the furor over the abuse scandal. Says a senior Bush official of the open warfare: “It is not very conducive to a healthy working environment.”

The White House will surely try to regroup, but it is appearing increasingly obvious that a wholesale purge of the senior ranks of the Bush administration will become necessary if Bush is to have any reasonable chance at a second term in office.