Arts Friday | Gosh, It’s May | It Must Be the Upfronts | Television

The 2018 Upfronts, when the major American networks present their new fall TV shows

In the merry, merry month of May each year, VanRamblings looks forward to two singular events: the Cannes Film Festival — which we’ll write about when, in August, the fine folks at the Vancouver International Film Festival announce the Cannes 2018 films that’ll play the 37th VIFF — and the annual “upfronts” roll-out. Upfronts, you say? What in tarnation is that?
Each May, the five major broadcast television networks in the U.S. announce their ‘hopeful new hits’ set to début in the fall, the action-packed dramas, the star-studded tug at your heartstrings programmes, and the laugh-riot comedies the networks hope you’ll tune into each week. There’s advertising money to acquire to contribute to the networks’ bottom line.
We’re talking a multi-million dollar business here, where your eyes on the screen translates into hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for the networks — broadcast networks that are not dead yet, despite the emergence of Netflix, cable networks like FX, and online programming.
If you’re a pop culture fanatic as we are, this is a salutary time of year.
A story. In 1975 VanRamblings began our first full-time, permanent job as a teacher. We loved teaching, thought the kids (and their parents) were great, and enjoyed and appreciated every moment of the time we were privileged to spend inside a classroom, imparting wisdom and hope, a love for learning and the acquisition of knowledge, and the building of character.

Two-year-old Jude Nathan Tomlin, baby Megan Jessica, and dad, Raymond, in June 1977VanRamblings pictured above with our two children, baby Megan Jessica & Jude Nathan

So, there we were: bearded, a sort of long-haired hippie (pictured above with our kids), teaching in the Interior. Kids fantastic. Parents great. Having the time of our young life. Go to the teacher’s lunchroom at recess and lunch. What does everyone talk about? Last night’s hilarious episode of All in the Family, Happy Days or the Mary Tyler Moore show.
Had we seen any of those programmes while we were attending university? Did Cathy and I have a TV? Is the Pope Polish (no, he’s not)?
First acquisition upon receiving our September mid-month cheque? Yep — a brand, spanking new and pretty darn skookum colour television set.
And, why not? Owning a TV provided an inroad into discussions with my students, on values, on different kinds of humour, on how television shows were made, and the dilemmas their favourite TV characters were experiencing in their ‘lives’. Same thing in the teacher lunchroom — talking about last night’s television programme quickly developed into a friendly and open camaraderie, and the development of rapport and closeness.
VanRamblings is no pointy-headed intellectual, no ideologue for whom television represents the opiate of the masses. Please. A life, you want a life — you’ll find one right over there. VanRamblings? We seek human connection, and respect for those around us, if they’ll give us half a chance.

The 2018 Upfronts, when the major American networks present their new fall TV shows

This autumn, there are 18 new programmes that are set to début on TV, and invade your consciousness.
Last year’s breakout hit was ABC’s The Good Doctor, which films at Surrey City Hall. The year before it was NBC’s This is Us, which remained a ratings generating powerhouse throughout its second season.
What can’t miss television show will break out in the fall and keep you glued to your television set? We’re not really going to know until July, when TV critics from across North America travel to Los Angeles for the annual star-infused junket overdose of all the new broadcast network programmes set to début two months later.
Okay, now to the good stuff. Trailers for all — well, six anyway, of — the new programmes. We’re not sure how they’ll render on your smart phone or tablet, so you may want to take at look at the trailers on your computer at home, if you’ve got one — which fewer and fewer people do these days.

Setting itself up to be the first new show to be cancelled in the fall, Manifest is a time travel via turbulence programme. Like they always work. As Kristen Baldwin in Entertainment Weekly said, “So it’s kind of like Lost meets all those shows where people come back from the dead and haven’t aged.” Yep. Pretty cast, though, and heart-tugging trailer. Manifest is up against NBC’s The Good Doctor — like we said, first to be cancelled.

Monday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Here’s one we like, which the critics seem not to. Maybe it’s because FBI stars Canadian actress Missy Peregrym, and we kinda liked her on Rookie Blue, ABC’s now cancelled summer replacement programme.

FBI will be broadcast on Tuesday nights on CBS, at 9pm, although one of the Canadian networks is bound to pick up the programme. Our Canadian CBC, CTV, Global and City television networks will announce their autumn schedules at press conferences to be held in Toronto next month.

Tuesday night American broadcast television networks schedule

The target market for the upstart CW network (owned by CBS) are young people, thus a new ethnically diverse Wednesday night programme with a driving beat, good looking young folks, with a PG-rated taste of sex and violence meant to appeal to a younger demographic. Could work.

All American will début in September on the CW, Wednesday’s at 9pm.

Wednesday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Ah yes, the first comedy to make our list — which, although we’re not a big fan of television comedies, looks like it could do fine, with a lot of relatability, and that cast. Bad time slot, though — I Feel Bad is going to have to break out early, and top the ratings in its time slot if its gonna survive, not an easy thing to do on the half hour, when you’re up against two programmes that started at 9 o’ clock. Still and all, I Feel Bad looks like it has potential, and Thursday’s are the most-watched television night of the week — which has been the case for a long, long time. American actress Sarayu Blue seems like a winning lead, too, so you never know.

Thursday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Friday night television is for the sad and lonely senior citizen. Hey, that’s us! CBS has a lock on Friday nights with McGyver (never watched it), Hawaii Five-O (which is getting a little long in the tooth), and Blue Bloods, which we never miss! Hey, it’s soothing — and not too over-the-top right wing. Youse takes your pleasures where you find ’em, we always say.
There is one new programme on Friday nights (see above), a comedy starring Martin Mull, who we haven’t seen a very long time, titled The Cool Kids. Ah, thanks Fox — calling us old geezer kids. You shouldn’t have.
No, really — you shouldn’t have.

Friday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Sundays. Heck, we’re just glad that CBS didn’t cancel Madam Secretary. There’s something vaguely reassuring watching a TV show depicting an engaged, involved American President gifted with wit and political acumen, who actually cares about the state of the world. And Téa Leoni as the keenly intelligent Secretary of State, with Tim Daly as her supportive and bright husband — and those kids, I want to adopt ’em all. Wow! Otherwise, it’s pretty thin gruel on Sunday nights, cuz of that darned NBC Football — like whoever watches that? Oh. Tens of millions. Okay, sorry about that.
Remember how we mentioned heart-tugging at the top of today’s column. Yeah, me too. Sundays on CBS at 8pm, God Friended Me (trailer above), we’re thinking break-out hit. Already, we’re in love with Violett Beane as Cara Bloom. And Brandon Micheal Hall as conflicted Miles Finer — looks like he’s landed on his feet just fine after ABC cancelled The Mayor last May.

Sunday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Hey, God Friended Me — a decent programme to watch at 8pm on Sunday nights, if you’ve got nothing else going on, or you just want to lay back, and get yourself in the head space to return to work on Monday.

A Master Class on Meeting Conduct, and Democratic Engagement

At each meeting of the Vancouver School Board Chairperson Janet Fraser offers a Master Class in respectful democratic engagement

There exists in our city, governance serving the public interest that sets the standard for democratic engagement — the likes of which VanRamblings does not recall ever previously having witnessed in the public realm.
We are, of course, speaking of the work of Chairperson of the Vancouver School Board, Janet Fraser, who meeting in, meeting out conducts a Master Class on how one must conduct a meeting, efficiently and well, in the public interest, respectful meetings of democratic engagement, where the Board of Education trustees are encouraged to work as a team — and woebetide the person who does not accede to Dr. Fraser’s unspoken ordinance.

Dr. Janet Fraser, Chairperson of the Vancouver School Board

For Dr. Janet Fraser, outward appearance to the contrary, is a tough as nails, brooks no nonsense, respectful, engaged, informed, demands the best from those sitting around the VSB Board of Education table, who absolutely and utterly does not ever allow untoward commentary to stand — the finest and most democratic public official, and Chairperson of any civic body we have ever had the privilege of witnessing.
A story. Early in her term as Vancouver School Board Chairperson, Janet Fraser allowed One City Vancouver trustee Carrie Bercic to move a motion that would see the newly-elected trustees working with staff to ensure the timely hiring of teachers and other educators, so as to meet the conditions of the November 2015 ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Ms. Bercic, even as early as the beginning of her term as school board trustee, was making it clear to anyone with ears to listen that she would be the new conscience of the Vancouver School Board ‘Board of Education’, as has proven to be the case throughout the course of 2018.
Veteran trustee Allan Wong, in support of trustee Bercic, seconded her motion, the motion now open for discussion, recently-elected Chairperson Fraser presiding at the head of the Board of Education table. Early reception for trustee Bercic’s motion was not salutary, with both Vancouver Non-Partisan Association trustees Fraser Ballantyne and Lisa Dominato, as might well be expected, speaking against “interference” by trustees in the work of administrative staff. Trustee Wong spoke in support of trustee Bercic’s motion, as did his Vision Vancouver colleague, Joy Alexander, while their colleague Ken Clement chose not to weigh in on the matter.
Trustee Estrellita Gonzalez, a novice in political life, looked on, attempting to weigh what she heard. And what trustee Gonzalez heard next, from her Green Party of Vancouver colleague, Dr. Judy Zaichowski rocked the meeting, sounding the death knell for trustee Bercic’s motion …

“Never have I heard such a poorly worded motion” trustee Zaichkowski proclaimed. “Trustee Bercic seems not to know what it is she is attempting to move, injudiciously unclear in her intent — quite honestly, I cannot make head nor tail of what trustee Bercic is attempting to accomplish. From what I’ve read, looking at her motion — a motion which she did not discuss with me, nor to the best of my knowledge, with other of the trustees around this table — I would suggest that, perhaps, “she” might benefit from one of the courses on ‘Clear Communication’ I teach at Simon Fraser University in the Beedie School of Business. I will not be supporting Ms. Bercic’s motion, and stand adamantly against it.”

A hush fell over the room. Trustee Gonzalez seeming to weigh no longer on how she would vote — she would cast her vote in the negative.
Meanwhile, trustees Dominato and Ballantyne seemed thunderstruck — it is usual business at the school board table that Fraser Ballantyne is the one who acts out. Meanwhile, Joy Alexander — always calm, had a look of alarm in her eyes, while you could almost hear trustee Wong’s thoughts on the matter (“Never in my 19 years as a trustee on school board, have I ever witnessed …”), while trustee Clement looked on, disbelieving of what he’d just heard — for this group of trustees, perhaps with one notable exception, are persons of conscience, as humane and caring of the public process that leads to the decisions that affect the lives of thousands as may be found on any publicly-elected body. All the while, even though it was but mere seconds, Chairperson Fraser sat at the head of the table, her face inscrutable, her thoughts unreadable. And then Dr. Fraser spoke

“Around this school board table, trustees speak to and about one another with respect. Trustee Zaichkowski (ed. note, one of the two Green Party trustees elected last October, along with Dr. Fraser), despite your statement and suggestion to the contrary, I feel quite assured that you know exactly what trustee Bercic’s motion intends. How could you not? The content and activism of trustee Bercic’s motion is as clear as day to me, as I am sure is the case with all of my other trustee colleagues sitting around this table this evening — clearly with the exception of yourself, if I am to believe what you said earlier … and I do not.

I will be supporting trustee Bercic’s motion, as I hope would be the case with my trustee colleagues, on whom I am depending for support of trustee Bercic’s motion, a motion the intent of which I clearly understand, and without reservation support. Could I now have a trustee Call the Question, so that we might vote?”

All tension in the air evaporated, you could hear the audible sighs of relief around the school board table, trustee Gonzalez was smiling for she now knew for certain how she would vote, with trustee Ballantyne speaking out of order to say, “I am fully in favour of trustee Bercic’s motion.”
Chairperson Janet Fraser asked for a show of hands, “All those in favour of trustee Bercic’s motion raise your hands.” Seven hands shot up: trustees Bercic, Wong, Alexander, Ballantyne, Clement, Dominato and Gonzalez. Chairperson Fraser next asked for a show of hand(s) for those opposed. Nothing. Trustee Zaichkowski had abstained on the motion that only minutes earlier she had spoken so vehemently against.
With the above described interaction of trustees now history, Dr. Fraser proved herself to be … how do we say it? … someone not to be fucked with. A tone was set. Dr. Janet Fraser was in charge. Going forward, members of the Vancouver School Board would work together in the best interests of children enrolled in the Vancouver school system.
Meanwhile, Dianne Turner (for whom I possess some great affection, and who is owed an apology from me … nothing too egregious, just some casual thoughtlessness on my part, if casual thoughtlessness can ever be juxtaposed with use of the word “just” … surely, a contradiction in terms) — the Official Trustee appointed by B.C. Liberal Education Minister, Mike Bernier, on behalf of the Christy Clark government, and kept on as a Special Advisor to current B.C. Education Minister, Rob Fleming, her term as Special Advisor expiring earlier this spring — looked around the room, at the gallery, at the trustees, and at Dr. Fraser. With a subtle, yet warm and reassuring smile, Ms. Turner limned the moment of reason and humanity that she had just witnessed around the school board table. You could almost hear her say, “I think they’re going to be just fine. Soon, I’ll be speaking with Minister Fleming, when I will seek to assure him that the Vancouver School Board is in good hands, and that he need not worry.”
Dr. Janet Fraser. Master Class in Meeting Conduct. Every Chairperson of every body, be it housing co-op, arts organization, elected body, or in any other forum where people come together to promote good governance and democratic decision-making would do themselves well to arrive at the offices of the Vancouver School Board this upcoming Monday evening.

Broadview Housing Co-operative, 2525 Waterloo Street, in Vancouver BC | KitsilanoBroadview Housing Co-operative, located in Vancouver’s Kitsilano neighbourhood

An Invitation to the Members of the Broadview Housing Co-operative, and to all Vancouver citizens
For anyone who is familiar with VanRamblings’ activist work in the community, you would know that we are a lifelong democrat, that we believe in respectful and informed democratic engagement, where although within a group or on an issue of contention on occasion we might disagree, we believe in humanity and what constitutes the best of us, as persons of conscience, as social activists, as engaged citizens striving always for more and better, not for ourselves — because we recognize that we are persons of privilege — but for others, for whom it is our obligation to use our privilege to make a difference in the lives of those with whom we come into contact daily, and for those whom we have not yet met, the vulnerable members of our community, for whom we harbour a deep and abiding caring, and for whom we will do our best to make theirs a better life, and in doing so give our own lives a sense of meaning and a deeper purpose.
Working together, striving to improve the lives of others, the creation of community, and a sense of social obligation defines life in housing co-ops, as it defines life in the public realm, at Council, Park and School Board.

Meeting of the 2018 Board of Education trustees with the Vancouver School Board

Why is VanRamblings inviting the members of our housing co-op, and you as citizens of Vancouver, to next Monday’s, May 28th public meeting of Vancouver School Board trustees, set to start at 7pm, at 1580 West Broadway, in the Board room at the Vancouver School Board’s head office?
In part, it’s because Broadview is a mere 19 blocks from the Vancouver School Board offices, an enjoyable walk, bike or bus ride away. And why not? Aren’t housing co-ops all about respectful, democratic engagement, and is it not important for the well-functioning not only of the Broadview Housing Co-op at our various general, finance, membership and maintenance committee meetings — but for all of us in the public weal — to strive always for better in the conduct of our lives, and in meeting engagement where decisions that have profound effect are rendered?
At next Monday’s Board of Education trustees meeting, you will see …

  • VSB Chairperson Janet Fraser working to increase engagement and teamwork among the trustees, in a meeting of passion and commitment;
  • Dr. Fraser creating an environment in the Board room where all the trustees contribute to the decision-making around the school board table, creating personal ownership of issues;
  • Chairperson Fraser setting standards for the meeting, by encouraging behaviors of respect needed for the meeting to be successful;
  • Dr. Fraser providing a sense of purpose, energy and optimism, and a sense of vision, mission and aspirational values that give meaning to the meeting, resulting in productive and demonstrably effective outcomes.

What you won’t see at meetings chaired by Dr. Fraser …

  • Cross-talk, verboten in proper and democratically-run meetings. Cross-talk occurs when someone has the floor, and others in the meeting are engaged in separate conversations, being disrespectful of the person who has the floor, and to others members present at the meeting;
  • A disrespect for Robert’s of Order, through which intimate knowledge ensures respectful, democratic decision-making by which all meeting governance must abide.

All meetings, whether at the Broadview Housing Co-operative, at City Council, School Board or Park Board must observe the rules of proper and respectful meeting conduct, and all chairpersons — whatever the body — must take their obligation as chairperson, as seriously and with as much import as does Dr. Fraser, who is as serious as death about ensuring democratic engagement will carry the day at school board, as should all persons engaged elsewhere who are charged with the responsibility of conducting respectful, fulsome and democratically-run meetings.
Victoria’s Cameo housing co-op has adopted rules of order to ensure their meetings abide by a central tenet on which Canada’s housing co-op movement was founded in the 1970s …

“The empowerment of housing co-op members, through the establishment of respectful, democratically-run meetings, occurs in order that members will feel empowered, not just around the co-op meeting table, but in the society at large, and in the public realm, so that the housing co-op movement might serve to fight against anomie, alienation, cynicism and disengagement from the decision-making that affects their lives in the municipal, provincial and federal political realm, for when a meeting is well run, when members are intimately familiar with Robert’s Rules of Order, when Co-op members are energized and engaged they might come to work with others to change the conditions of their lives, and the lives of others, so as to better serve the common good.”

Of course, in British Columbia, members of the Co-operative Housing Federation of British Columbia can avail themselves of the three-hour Good Governance and Principled Leadership workshop, where a CHF-BC staff person travels to housing co-ops to teach a simplified version of Robert’s Rules of Order, how to capably chair a meeting, how to manage difficult situations, how to make meaningful decisions in a timely and respectful manner, and how to conduct a productive meeting.
Or, as CHF-BC is wont to say …

“In a well-run co-op, meetings run smoothly. They’re a place where things get done instead of done to you. Good meetings produce sound decisions and are a positive experience for members. Bad meetings don’t get the work done and undermine morale.”

Members of Broadview are always open to ensuring that our meetings run better, are more efficient and respectful of members’ time, that decisions are arrived at thoughtfully and in a timely manner, that humanity and a respect for others around the meeting table is of prime importance for the well-functioning of not only a co-op meeting but for the interests of our housing co-operative, and the housing co-op movement, as a whole.
For we in Vancouver, and in British Columbia, are at a crossroads in the history of the provision of affordable housing. The conduct of the affairs of any of the housing co-ops in Metro Vancouver and across the province, must reflect the best values of the housing co-op movement, as respectful, member-owned-and-run affordable social housing projects — for soon, very soon, we are about to witness our municipal, provincial and federal governments embark on a housing co-op construction programme, the likes of which we have not witnessed in 40 years.

Housing Co-ops: The Solution to Vancouver's Affordable Housing Crisis

VanRamblings would then ask of Broadview members, and of you …
When such a resource as Dr. Fraser is so nearby, so readily available, the meetings she has been charged by the public to conduct, as close to beauty in the public realm as one is likely to encounter in the course of our prosaic daily lives, why would one — and members of Broadview Housing Co-op, in particular — not wish to avail themselves of nonpareil beauty extant?
And as Broadview’s Laurie and Kevin, Libbi and Yvon, Alex, Goran, Josh, Laurette and Yoshi, Judi and Max, Tatiana, Kyle, Charlotte and Richard, Tina and Shane, Joe, Jette, Heather and Jason, Natasha and Meaghan will be present this next Monday evening for the well-conducted one and a half hour, critical to the future of children enrolled in the Vancouver school system, movingly profound meeting of our Board of Education trustees …

One City’s ‘move you to tears’ social justice warrior, Carrie Bercic; Beedie School of Business professor, Dr. Judy Zaichowkski, and her quiet, yet passionately engaged Green Party colleague, Estrellita Gonzalez; retired school principal, Fraser Ballantyne, and the utterly tremendous Lisa Dominato, mom to a daughter enrolled in Grade One, and up until recently, the Director of Integrated Services and Safe Schools in B.C.’s Ministry of Education; the calming, informed, reasoned — and we think, sometimes mischievous — Joy Alexander, and her Vision Vancouver colleagues, the entirely tremendous Allan Wong, a father of daughters, and a 19-year veteran School Board trustee; and Ken Clement of the Ktunaxa First Nation, long a voice for social justice, health and housing for our indigenous peoples, and at School Board, an activist for better educational outcomes for Aboriginal students …

VanRamblings believes that you, too, must be present to witness, to avail yourselves of the opportunity to be a participant school board meeting observer, in what we assure you — and what we assure Broadview Housing Co-op members — will prove to be a transformative experience in your life, in their lives, in service to what is the best of us, democracy, respectful democratic engagement, and needed and necessary change for the better.

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Conflicted Candidate Announces for Mayor

Squamish Nation Hereditary Chief Ian Campbell Seeks Vision Vancouver Endorsement for Mayor

VanRamblings harbours a great deal of respect for retiring Vision Vancouver City Councillor Andrea Reimer, and for Stepan Vdovine — recent, and now former, Executive Director of the party that has governed Vancouver for the past almost 10 year now. We believe both to be admirable persons of honour and integrity, persons of conscience possessed of good judgment.
When Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell announced on May 14th that he would be seeking the endorsement of Vision Vancouver to become Vancouver’s next Mayor, we were surprised — and we would have to say disappointed, as well — that Ms. Reimer had signed on as co-chair of Mr. Campbell’s bid to become Vision Vancouver’s Mayoral aspirant.
We were also surprised (and disappointed, although one supposes we shouldn’t have been) that Stepan Vdovine, Mayor Gregor Robertson’s former chief of staff Mike Magee, Vision Vancouver’s former co-chairperson, Maria Dobrinskaya, and longtime Vision campaign veteran and labour activist Clay Suddaby had also signed on to Mr. Campbell’s bid to become Vancouver’s next Mayor. Ms. Reimer’s co-chair on Ian Campbell’s well-oiled-and-organized campaign is urban planner Ginger Gosnell-Myers, who resigned in March as the City of Vancouver’s aboriginal relations manager.
Why is VanRamblings disappointed that Ms. Reimer and Mr. Vdovine, in particular, have come forward as staunch supporters of Mr. Campbell?
As you’ll read today, and as you’ll read ad nauseum in the months to come should — c’mon, let’s face it, he’s a lock for the Vision Vancouver nomination — Mr. Campbell emerge as the well-financed and Vision Vancouver-backed candidate for Mayor, there won’t be enough print, enough social media space, and enough online blog and other chatter to carry all the stories of how Mr. Campbell is the developers developer, how he currently has 16 major development projects in Metro Vancouver in the pipeline — most of which projects will come before Vancouver City Council in the next term — and how “conflicted” he would be should he become Vancouver’s next Mayor, on the evening of Saturday, October 22nd.

Squamish Nations Hereditary Chief Ian Campbell ponders what it would be like to be Vancouver MayorSquamish Nations’ Ian Campbell ponders what it would be like to be Vancouver Mayor

In a story published last Friday, written by Vancouver Courier civic affairs columnist and reporter Mike Howell, he wrote that …

(Ian Campbell is) a key negotiator in getting (the Squamish Nation) to work with the Musqueam and Tsleil-Waututh nations to reclaim more than 120 acres of land in Vancouver.

The properties include the 90-acre Jericho lands (the 36-hectare property overlooking Jericho Beach Park) …

Vancouver's 36 hectare Jericho Lands set to be developed over the next 15 years.

Jericho Lands expected to be redeveloped into a residential neighbourhood

… the 21-acre Heather Street lands near Queen Elizabeth Park (ed. note, from The Straight, “which used to be the home of the RCMP headquarters in B.C., previously known as the RCMP Fairmont Lands, the property located north of 37th Avenue, south of 33rd Avenue, by the lanes behind Willow and Ash streets, the draft statement for the Heather Lands proposing a mainly residential development, which include towers ranging in heights from 12 storeys to 24 storeys) …

Massive Heather Lands development, a 21-acre site between West 33rd and 37th avenuesHeather Lands, a 21-acre development site between West 33rd & 37th avenues

Vancouver properties owned by First Nations - Musqueam, Squamish & Tsleil-Waututh - peoples that are set for development over the next four years

… and the 10-acre Liquor Distribution Branch warehouse property on East Broadway, which is co-owned with the Aquilini Investment Group.

Once redeveloped, the value of the properties is estimated to be in the billions of dollars.

The federal government’s commercial property arm, Canada Lands Company, holds an equal interest in the Heather Street lands and 52 acres of the Jericho lands; the remaining 38 acres of Jericho is owned by the bands.

The Squamish Nation has plans to develop land at the foot of the Burrard Bridge.The Squamish Nation plans to develop land at the foot of the Burrard Bridge

The Squamish also fully owns an 11-acre property that runs under the south side of the Burrard Bridge, which is not under the portfolio of the MST Development Corporation but is slated for redevelopment at some point in the future.

In total, Mr. Campbell is the developer of “approximately 160 acres in Metro Vancouver,” over one billion dollars in property that when developed will change the face of Vancouver in ways untold, and perhaps not desirable.

Do The Citizens of Vancouver want Squamish Nations developer Ian Campbell as Mayor?

Do the citizens of Vancouver really want major developer Ian Campbell, the person behind the development of the critical properties to Vancouver’s future identified above, as our city’s next Mayor? Perhaps Mr. Campbell would not find himself conflicted as Mayor, but we have a difficult time believing that would be the case, as would the citizens of Vancouver, we would suggest. In politics it’s all about optics, and the optics here are bad.
Whether you’re on the left or on the right side of the political spectrum, the number one complaint about Vision Vancouver this past 10 years is that they are the developer party, in bed with the developers who have financed their winning campaigns for office — electoral wins that have served the interests of the majority Vision Vancouver party at City Hall, while ill-serving the interests of the average citizen in Vancouver, and ill-serving the crying need for building truly affordable housing in the City of Vancouver.

Would Ian Campbell find himself in perpetual conflict of interest were he to become Vancouver Mayor>” alt=”Would Ian Campbell find himself in perpetual conflict of interest were he to become Vancouver Mayor>” src=”https://vanramblings.com/upload/conflict-interest.jpg” border=”1″ width=”520″ height=”269″ class=”mt-image-none” style=”” /></span></p>
<p>While we are loathe to demonize developers, as we have written previously, and as much as we admire Ms. Reimer and Mr. Vdovine, we cannot believe that either is so tone deaf to the concerns of Vancouver citizens across the political spectrum — particularly following the drubbing Vision received at the polls in last year’s October 19th by-election — that both, and other of their Vision colleagues, would promote the candidacy of Squamish Nation Hereditary Chief Ian Campbell, who although he may be a good man, is a resident of North Vancouver, will likely be in for a very rough time at the hands of the media (not to mention, Vancouver’s five other civic parties), and <em><font color=#990000>appears so conflicted</font></em>, and so much the embodiment of what the citizens of Vancouver have <em><font color=#990000>found wanting</font></em> in Vision Vancouver as a civic party of integrity working in the interests of <em><font color=#990000>all</font></em> of the citizens of Vancouver, and very much <em><font color=#990000>the antithesis</font></em> of what the citizens of Vancouver are looking for in a ‘man (or woman) of the people’ Mayor to lead the city forward.</p>
<hr width=

Squamish Nation traditional territory includes the settler community of Vancouver.

Additional note: VanRamblings reader Claudia Ferris writes, ” … if he’s (Ian Campbell) Squamish he is running in his territory,” as clarification and correction of what is written above, that Mr. Campbell is a “North Vancouver resident.”

Activist and community leader Claudia Ferris (2nd from right) standing with Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell — currently running for the Vision Vancouver nomination for Mayor — working together to build a Visitor Information park in Gibsons, on British Columbia's Sunshine Coast.Activist and community leader Claudia Ferris (2nd from right) standing with Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell — currently running for the Vision Vancouver nomination for Mayor — working together to build a Visitor Information park in Gibsons.

Ms. Ferris adds, “One of the reasons I like Ian Campbell is because of the interaction I had with him when I lived in Gibsons. I was on the leadership team of the Gibsons and District Chamber of Commerce when we built a visitor information park. The site is on the Squamish territory and I invited their leadership to the opening. And they came! Chief Campbell and his councillors were very responsive and helpful and it was a pleasant experience to be supported in building a community amenity. We also had singers from the Sechelt Band come out and it felt very inclusive and progressive to be working together. Chief Campbell was a total sweetheart throughout the process.”

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Humility as the Key to Electoral Success

OneCity Vancouver co-founders, Christine Boyle, Cara Ng, and Alison AtkinsonOneCity Vancouver co-founders, Christine Boyle, Cara Ng, and Alison Atkinson (Anna Chudnovsky missing from photo) working during last year’s Vancouver civic by-election

The attribute of OneCity Vancouver’s Christine Boyle we most admire is her humility, the bedrock foundation of her hopeful candidacy for City Council.
While what childcare advocate Sharon Gregson has to say about the socially just Christine Boyle is true, as Ms. Boyle herself has written on her campaign website reflects her values and commitment to our city, that …

“It’s time to tackle Vancouver’s deepening wealth gap, ensure that homes are for housing people rather than profits, and strengthen community and democracy, to change the direction Vancouver is headed, and make ours a city where people can live and belong for generations to come”…

British Columbia childcare advocate Sharon Gregson endorses Christine Boyle for Vancouver City Council

… what is also true is that she is not alone in her recognition of the role humility plays, if one is to both achieve elected office and prove an effective community leader. Note should be made that humility is not a decision made by a political aspirant to gain success, but rather an essential part of the very nature of those who are seeking, or already hold political office, an essential element to their success in the common weal of public life.

Humility as an essential building block to electoral success, and a life well-lived.The building blocks, and the foundation of electoral success: humility and service

In Vancouver, politicians who bring immense humility to the endeavours of political life are legion: the very bright democrat of conscience, Sarah Kirby-Yung at Park Board, who will seek a seat on Council this upcoming autumn as a candidate with the Vancouver Non-Partisan Association; her equally generous and bright colleague of conscience and integrity, John Coupar, an NPA aspirant for Mayor — and for that matter, all of the Commissioners who sit on our Vancouver Park Board: coach and Park Board Committee Chair, Casey Crawford; the ‘he’s so articulate and compassionate that he will bring you to tears’ Green Park Board Commissioner, Stuart Mackinnon; Erin Shum, perhaps the hardest-working member of Park Board, who folks like Ainslie Kwan, the President of the Killarney Community Centre cannot find words superlative enough to describe Erin’s humanity, her ‘gets thing done’ ethos, and her ability to not just listen, but really hear what is being said, and act on what she has heard; and the reasonable and reasoned, quietly powerful force of nature on our beloved Vancouver Park Board, Catherine Evans, who is also seeking to win a seat on Vancouver City Council this upcoming autumn season …

Michael Wiebe, Green Party of Vancouver Park Board Commissioner, and 2018 City Council aspirantMichael Wiebe, Green Party Park Board Commissioner, and 2018 City Council aspirant

Perhaps the most pleasant surprise of this past electoral term is recent Park Board Chair, Green Party of Vancouver Commissioner, and now aspirant for an elected position on Vancouver City Council, Michael Wiebe (we like that he’s now calling himself “Michael”, rather than Mike — affords him the well-earned gravitas that has emerged this past four years of his political life), who can be seen everywhere across town, as the owner-operator of the eight 1/2 Restaurant Lounge, the President of the Mount Pleasant BIA, and the co-founder of the recently formed Vancouver Art House Society (VAHS), a non-profit with a mandate to preserve the city’s rapidly-disappearing arts and culture spaces (think: the Rio Theatre, as but one example).
Whether it’s retiring City Councillor Andrea Reimer, or her Green party colleague, Adriane Carr; or OneCity Vancouver’s Carrie Bercic at the Vancouver School Board, or her Green party colleagues on the Board, Estrellita Gonzalez and Janet Fraser, and Vision Vancouver School Board trustees, Joy Alexander and Allan Wong, the innate nature of these successful, hard-working, dedicated and respected elected persons of conscience carry within them a sense not just of service, but of the virtue of humility, an appreciation of oneself, of one’s talents and skills, and a commitment to integrity, and the effacing of oneself to noble pursuit: the achievement of better & more, not for themselves, but for us, for all of us.

To be a respected, successful and admired politician, one must know what one stands for, what one is fighting for, the electoral aspirant must know how to go about achieving the ends promised to voters during the course of a campaign for office, how to work with others, be a voice for change for the better, and always, always remember that theirs is a life of service, one sometimes with no reward other than the knowledge one is doing good and performing their very best, all the while keeping deep within them a humble nature, in recognition that no matter the inducements of office, that it was humility and perseverance that elected them to office, and humility that will sustain them, and provide the foundation for their service.