When it comes to political jokers, David Letterman beats Jay Leno and critics’ darling Jon Stewart hands down.
It makes sense that the late-night talk-show wars, just passing their 10-year anniversary, would continue to consume audience interest. With each passing day, David Letterman — who seems to have developed a comfort level at CBS, even as he continues to make ironic detachment a way of life for several generations of fans — becomes ever more honest and human, allowing for a darker, more mature side to his comic’s take on life. More grounded than the competition, there’s genuine power to his words, particularly since his recovery from heart surgery.
Jay Leno, meanwhile, remains the guy who will do anything for ratings, most obviously when it involves some degree of political partisanship, like the kind that gave Arnold Schwarzenegger’s recall-candidacy, last year, the shove it needed to take California’s governorship.
In a recent article published in L.A. Weekly, Nikke Finke (an archive of her work is available as a link, to your left, under Cinema) writes …

Late Show has the brass balls to go where the cowardly White House news corps and corporate suck-up Leno fear to tread: presenting Dubya in all his dumb-ass glory.

Finke’s article is well worth a read.
As always, Slate continues to publish regular Bushisms, a malaprop version of the U.S. president’s accidental wit and wisdom.

Coming to a computer, a PDA or a cell phone near you: Internet TV!
According to a story in the New Zealand Herald, later this month the BBC will launch a pilot project destined to be the first step in a process that could lead to all television programmes, across the globe, being made available on the Internet.
Says Ashley Highfield, the BBC’s director of new media and technology …

“If we don’t enter this market, then exactly what happened to the music industry could happen to us, where we ignore it, keep our heads in the sand and everybody starts posting the content up there and ripping us off”

Highfield indicated that the quality of the programmes on offer will be so high that the experience of watching a show on a PDA will be similar to that of viewing an in-flight film on the seatback of an aircraft.

Preparing for the final episode of Friends. Is life as we know coming to an end?

Zap2it.com (to your left, under Television) has put together a handy schedule of all of the 2004 season finales.
For instance, tonight is the last episode of Scrubs on NBC at 9:30 p.m. And, unless you’ve been hiding in a cave in Borneo, you are absolutely aware that Friends goes away — FOREVER — this Thursday. Read The Defamer’s (the web’s newest gossipy blog) spoiler-laden story on just exactly what’s going to transpire on the final show.

There’s a tectonic shift happening in television that will profoundly transform the way we receive news, the news we see, and our ability to access the news of our choice. Benefits for the public have been slow in coming, but suddenly “multicasting” — that’s the hot new word — is on the lips of everybody in TV land.
In this new digital era, the so-called analog, one-channel version of television will soon be as archaic as a 1950 Studebaker. Besides local 24-hour all-news and all-weather channels, over-the-air broadcasters will be able to devise local versions of programming we currently find only on cable.
Programmes covering provincial legislatures and city councils, public hearings, community board meetings, court trials, school board sessions, school lunch menus, school closings, public event schedules, updates on terror alert levels, and disaster warnings, along with documentaries on issues of local concern, free airtime for office-seekers, children’s news and educational shows, and almost anything else station owners can dream up — with simultaneous translation into other languages for the benefit of local non-English-speaking minorities, will be readily available.
Then there’s the datacasting of text: stock market quotes, sports statistics, classified advertising, radio and TV programme schedules, and even electronic newspapers.
Public interest and other advocacy groups are keeping a close eye on the changes, and have expressed concern about the inability, thus far, of broadcasters to promote a variety of news voices, and points of view. In an era when over-the-air television is one of the most potent forces shaping public opinion, a process involving more democratic access to the airwaves will prove an absolute necessity if the collective interests of our communities is to be maintained.