Category Archives: BC Politics

On the Left = Daily Activism Towards a Fairer, More Just Society

Seeking Justice, and Working Towards a Fairer and More Just Society

If You Ain’t Marchin’ at Rallies For Causes You Support, Working Within Your Union (or Organizing a Bargaining Unit in a Non-Union Place of Employment) and Are On The Union Executive, If You Haven’t Joined a Left-of-Centre Political Party (Municipally, Provincially and Federally — Parties to Which You Donate Monies Each Month), Are Not Actively Engaged in the Fight Against Racism & Intolerance, If You’re Not Engaged in the Fight for LGBTQ Rights and Offering Your Active Support To Members of Our Transgender Community, If You Are Not Championing UNDRIP and Offering Your Active Support For The Right to Self-Determination for Members of Indigenous Communities — And Do Not Acknowledge That You Are Living On Stolen Land — If You Ain’t Fighting Together With Your Neighbours, and With A Broad Cross-Section of Members of Our Community Towards Achieving a Fairer, More Just Society for All — And Are Not Actively Engaged in That Fight — You Ain’t a Leftist.

Colten Boushie rally, Vancouver, February 10, 2018Rally held in Vancouver, Feb. 10, 2018 protesting wrongful death of 22-year old Colten Boushie of the Cree Red Pheasant First Nation fatally shot on a rural Saskatchewan farm.

Approximately a year and a half ago, in the lead up to the 2018 Vancouver civic election, a former neighbour contacted me to ask if I would be open to discussing with her the latest article by noted left wing journalist and documentarian, John Pilger, on the continuing genocidal debacle in Syria.
As was the case with another former neighbour, Marion had experienced a late in life conversion to leftist politics, dedicating herself to reading Noam Chomsky, John Pilger, Naomi Klein, Owen Jones, Irshad Manji and others.
During the course of our conversation, I asked her how she would involve herself in the upcoming municipal election, which civic party or parties and which candidates for those parties she would be supporting and working to get elected, which groups she had aligned herself with, and what for her were the key issues that drove her commitment to moving the societal agenda forward towards the realization of a fairer and more just society.

Politics and activism, Martha Gellhorn

“Oh, there’s no one in the city who’s as left as I am, no one with whom I would affiliate, and no political party that reflects the approach I believe needs to be taken to tear down the old order, and build a new and more democratic society,” Marion told me. “I would never join the NDP — they’re neoliberal collaborators, every single one of them — and there are no other parties on the left who reflect my values, municipally or otherwise.”
I asked her if in the past she had ever worked on a New Democratic Party provincial or federal campaign, or worked in Vancouver’s left leaning, sometimes thought to be Communist, Coalition of Progressive Electors, with whom she had affiliated herself, and with whom she had worked urgently towards the realization of the societal change she felt critical and essential.
The answer: no one, ever, on any issue, ever, never worked with anyone.

Protesting the Kinder Morgan pipeline

Calling Yourself Left Wing Means Unequivocal Community Activism
Words without action accomplishes nothing. One cannot describe oneself as progressive or a leftist without working with others towards social change. Activism is not ever a solitary activity, change does not occur in isolation.
If you’re going to call yourself a progressive, a leftist or a socialist, here are the pre-conditions necessary to adopt that nomenclature …

Join the BC NDP

Join a political party. During the course of the 2017 British Columbia election, more than 400 volunteers joined the Re-Elect David Eby campaign, out daily door knocking, participating in burmashaves, delivering NDP literature to constituents across the Vancouver Point Grey provincial riding, out on the streets daily, including teachers who lived in Kitsilano but taught in Coquitlam, Delta, Langley and Surrey — but there they were every day, picking up literature, receiving instruction and their assignment from David’s inspiring (and organized) volunteer co-ordinator, Danika Skye Hammond. The 400 number doesn’t account, either, for the 200 inside volunteers working the phones from 9 a.m. til 9 p.m. seven days a week.
The same energy and passion David Eby’s volunteers brought to his 2017 re-election campaign — and aren’t you glad that David is British Columbia’s Attorney General & Minister of Justice? — an equal number of enthusiastic volunteers brought to Mable Elmore’s campaign in Vancouver-Kensington, Adrian Dix’s re-election campaign in Vancouver Kingsway, and to every BC NDP campaign in every riding across the province of British Columbia. Cuz getting out to actively support and contribute to your candidate’s campaign for office is what democratic socialist / leftist politics is all about.
Gaining friends. Feeling isolated in your community? See people on the street in your neighbourhood, and think to yourself, “I bet they’d be interesting to get to know” — but you’re hardly going to walk up and start a conversation with a complete stranger, someone you don’t even know. Joining with other like-minded members of your community in an important political endeavour that will help to bring about the necessary change you want to see and know needs to occur sooner than later serves to break down the pervasive sense of isolation that plagues contemporary society.
Campaigns for left-of-centre parties rely on volunteers — they can’t raise, and in most cases don’t want, the corporate funds that the Liberals and Conservative parties hoover up in the millions. All of which means: the federal NDP, the BC NDP, COPE and OneCity Vancouver — if you live in Vancouver — need you to contribute whatever funds you can afford.

Little Mountain rally in Vancouver in support of providing social housing on Litte Mountain siteAt 11am, this upcoming Saturday, November 30th, hundreds of members of our community will rally at what was once the Little Mountain social housing site, at 33rd and Ontario in Vancouver, to protest the utter lack of progress over the past 12 years in building social and moderate rental housing on the Little Mountain site — rallying, as well, to encourage the provincial government to re-acquire the site sold to Holborn Properties Ltd. in 2007 by the B.C. Liberals, in order to immediately begin the development of social and moderate rental housing, and co-operative and co-housing projects, on the site.

Rallies. If you’ve never attended a rally, or do not regularly attend rallies — on climate change, indigenous issues, tenant’s rights, affordable housing, anti-racism, in support of public education, or any of the myriad issues of societal concern — you are neither a progressive nor a leftist. Rather, you’re a couch potato, or as George Orwell wrote in 1984, a prole:

… a member of the lowest rung of society, of society’s bottom class, those who are only educated to a basic degree and in consequence perform routinized tasks or perform menial labour that requires little thought or engagement, those in society who are utterly without power and who are given over almost entirely to hedonistic pursuit, to drinking and carousing and sex, to attendance at mass sporting events, and those who live in society without any sense of a social conscience or an understanding of the nature of the state, and who simply ‘don’t want to know’ because it taxes their brains, or keeps them away from their hedonistic pursuits — allowing them not to think or engage in common cause with others, or find any meaning in their regrettable, pitiless lives.

Academic studies have shown that only four per cent of the population is at all engaged in the life of society, have joined a political party, are actively involved in their union, have ever attended a march or a rally, or ever engaged with others to bring about societal change towards the realization of a fairer and more just society. That lamentable circumstance must change if we are to survive as a species, if the quality of our lives and that of our children, our friends, colleagues and our neighbours are to prevail.

Unions Make Us Strong

Being a Union member
Unions have a substantial impact on the compensation and work lives of both unionized and non-unionized workers.

1. Unions raise wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise compensation, including both wages and benefits, by about 28%;

2. Unions reduce wage inequality because they raise wages more for low- and middle-wage workers than for higher-wage workers, more for blue-collar than for white-collar workers, and more for workers who do not have a college degree;

3. The most sweeping advantage for unionized workers is in the benefits that are afforded. Unionized workers are more likely than their non-unionized counterparts to receive paid leave, are approximately 18% to 28% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance, and are 23% to 54% more likely to be in employer-provided pension plans;

4. Unionized workers receive more generous health benefits than non-unionized workers. They also pay 18% lower health care deductibles and a smaller share of the costs for family coverage. In retirement, unionized workers are 24% more likely to be covered by health insurance paid for by their employer;

5. Unionized workers receive better pension plans. Not only are they more likely to have a guaranteed benefit in retirement, their employers contribute 28% more toward pensions;

6. Unionized workers receive 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid leave (vacations and holidays).

Unions play a pivotal role both in securing legislated labour protections and rights such as safety and health, overtime, and family/medical leave and in enforcing those rights on the job.
All the gains that union membership affords — increasingly, for all of us, union members as well as (to a lesser degree) non-union members — have not occurred as part of a befuddingly magical process. All of us live in an increasingly just society arising from the hard work of union members over many, many decades, marching on picket lines, and placing themselves in harm’s way facing down intransigent employers given to violence against their employees (more a feature of the past, although it still occurs today).
If you are a member of a union: your union needs you, needs your energy, your passion and your compassion. Take the training and become a shop steward. Run for a position on your union executive. Get to know your fellow union members, build community, build solidarity of purpose and intent — and, as above, in joining a political party — break down your sense of community isolation while working towards building relationships full of meaning that will enhance the quality of your life, gain new friends, and know that when you go to sleep at night that you’ve made a difference.

Activism: working with others towards societal change beneficial to the majority of the population

As a leftist, you are perforce an activist — which means you are working actively with others towards the realization of a fairer, more just society.
Other than working with political parties and working within your union, supporting causes that are important to you, marching and rallying with others to bring attention to the issues that require our immediate attention, how else might you address yourself to the issue of societal change?

1. Attend a meeting of your local City Council, School Board, and in Vancouver, the Park Board meetings — find out what the core issues are that these elected bodies area attempting to address, see democracy in action, get yourself on the speaker’s list at Council or Park Board.

Get involved!

2. If you live in Vancouver, make application to be a member of one of the city’s 33 advisory committees that help determine city policy. Every community provides opportunities for citizen involvement in the decision-making process in civic government. Get involved. Make a difference;

3. Attend talks & seminars on diverse topics. Thursday night, November 28th at 7pm, for instance, there’s a seminar, deemed a “conversation,” at SFU Woodwards, 149 West Hastings Street on the topic, Shaping Vancouver 2019: Conversation #4: What’s Happening to Heritage?

4. Change-makers to follow on social media. If you’re not following, regularly reading and interacting with community activists Derrick O’Keefe and housing activist Stephanie Allen — currently, VanRamblings’ favourite, make a difference, live every moment of their lives with integrity, community activists — you can’t honestly say you know what’s going on in our city. Vancouver and District Labour Council President Stephen (pronounced Stefan) Von Sychowski on Facebook is a must-follow, as is recent Coquitlam-Port Coquitlam federal NDP candidate, Christina Gower — my favourite friend find on Facebook in three years, her every post on social media compelling, humane and full of compassion and wit — and former / almost won Vancouver False Creek 2017 NDP candidate and community and transgender activist, Morgane Oger on Twitter — if you aren’t following all five you don’t know what you’re missing. A lot!
The same is true for public education activist, Patti Bacchus — VanRamblings’ favourite non-elected political figure in the province, if not all of Canada, an honest, unafraid truth teller of the first order.

The persons whose names are listed above are agents of change.

Social activism towards a fairer and more just society

To reiterate: leftist politics requires activism and engagement. Activists work for necessary, meaningful change, and do not in any way hinder it.

Activism: working with others towards societal change beneficial to the majority of the population

There are two more features to left politics, caring and empathy.

Women's Rights Are Human Rights

Those who are working on the left are involved in selfless endeavour, requiring not just a little bit of caring, but rather the capacity for immense caring, and activism: we fight with people who for too long have been voiceless in the decision-making affecting their lives. Men fight together with women towards the creation of a fairer, much safer society for our distaff population of partners and spouses, sisters and children.

Empathy

More than caring, even immense caring, we require throughout our day, every day, empathy for all those around us, for all those persons with whom we come into contact, and on behalf of whom we engage in activism towards a fairer and more just society.
What is required of us always is empathy, of which commodity there is too little in our world, be it at our current city council or school board or, for far too many, in the daily machinations of our lives.
If you are white and middle class, before you speak, put yourself in the position of others — be they persons of colour, indigenous persons, immigrants or refugees, or members of the LGBTQ community — listen to what members of these minority communities have to say about their life experience, and the discrimination they face — and, for good measure — acknowledge your white privilege, that just by very dint of your skin colour, chances are that your experience of life is so very much easier than those who are members of a minority community.
And act accordingly.

Cover of the UNDRIP - United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Fight, along with our indigenous peoples and our federal and provincial governments for reconciliation — just yesterday, our provincial legislature unanimously endorsed UNDRIP, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the first province in Canada to do so.
If our governments — municipally, provincially and federally — are committed to reconciliation with our indigenous peoples, that reconciliation has been acknowledged as a core Canadian value, then it is incumbent upon each and every one of us to do all that is in our power to support reconciliation with our indigenous population, to ensure that centuries of genocide are acknowledged, and a commitment to a just reconciliation with our indigenous peoples is atop the social and political agenda.
And, finally, on the topic of empathy, this quote from Joshua Halberstam …

Joshua Halberstam, author of Everyday Ethics. "It's not easy doing a life."

#VanPoli | Vancouver City Council | Vapid & Not on Your Side

Vancouver City Hall.

Today’s VanRamblings column was originally intended to take our “new” Vancouver City Council to task, a City Council in which we are profoundly disappointed — who have against all reason turned out to be a reactionary amalgam of self-serving, do-nothing municipal politicians who have surrounded themselves with sycophants who praise them for their “good works”, a group of electeds who not only have lost the thread of why it was they were elected (read: build affordable housing!), but rather who have proven these past seven months to be just like the character in the Danish author Hans Christian Andersen’s 1837 tale, The Emperor’s New Clothes, who seem to as the child in the story says appears not to be “wearing anything at all!”
We here at VanRamblings had intended on employing satirical commentary, combined with our tried-and-true hyperbolic approach to recording our thoughts on the screen in front of you for the Thursday post today.
But, alas, we’re simply not up for doing that on this tremendous day!

Vessi footwear | Carbon blue | 100% waterproof | comfyVanRamblings’ new carbon blue Vessi shoes. Comfy. Stylish. 100% waterproof!

For you see, it is a wonderfully sunny day in Vancouver, deserving of a walk along the beach and an opportunity to spend time with friends. Today, VanRamblings — our disappointment in our “new” Vancouver City Council notwithstanding — find ourselves enjoying our new carbon blue Vessi shoes that are comfy and swell-looking and oh-so-stylish, which makes us happy.
So, in consequence, VanRamblings will hold off until next week to spell out exactly why we find ourselves dispirited in respect of Vancouver’s “new” do-nothing, survival of the fittest Darwinian City Council, and instead will set about to enjoy the day, while thinking to our self: why was editor, author, columnist, political activist, father, lover of baseball, and person of principle (always!) Derrick O’Keefe not elected to Council, to hold the current ne’er-do-well group of “oh we love our City staff, they’d never give us advice and provide direction to us that is anything other than true to the interests of the citizenry of our fair city” members of our inept Council to account?
Arts Friday on Friday. Stories of a Life on Saturday. Music Sunday Sunday.
And back to municipal political writing on Monday or Tuesday. See ya then.

Taxpayer vs Citizen | Responding to Right Wing Propaganda

Taxes

The suffering hero of our times is, we are told, the tormented taxpayer.

Conservative politicians mount campaigns to protect the taxpayer, editorial writers evaluate politicians and their policies on whether they will increase or decrease the “burden” to taxpayers, and some self-described taxpayers have formed faux, corporate-funded organizations to plead their cause & lament their plight. Thus, you have the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

Toni Morrison, American novelist, essayist, editor, teacher and professor emeritus at Princeton University.
Nobel prize winning author Toni Morrison, in her New York apartment. Photo | Tim Knox

At a speaking engagement, a few years back, at a New Yorker festival, Pulitzer Prize winning American novelist, essayist, editor, teacher and professor emeritus at Princeton University, Toni Morrison, offered insightful commentary on topics about race, gender, writing, and other issues. One particular observation made by Ms. Morrison was quite memorable …

The complexity of the so-called individual that’s been praised for decades in America somehow has narrowed itself to the ‘me’. When I was a young girl we were called citizens — American citizens. We were second-class citizens, but that was the word. In the 50s and 60s they started calling us consumers. So we did — consume. Now they don’t use those words any more — it’s the American taxpayer, and those are different attitudes.

The phrase “taxpayer’s money” is almost always propaganda — that must be rejected and resisted by all of us who support progressive politics.A better phrase is “public money”.

So, why do so few in the news media, if any at all in these times of corporate-owned media, refuse to use the term public money, replacing it instead with the far from benign word taxpayer?

Public money is the property of the entire public, not of taxpayers.

Taxes are a way to pool our resources and develop common infrastructure that can have a positive impact on us all. They build our roads and bridges, pay for our police and firefighters, our system of justice, offer support for raising children and contribute to reducing child poverty, provide income security and housing for people who are in need, contribute to foreign aid, and help to ensure our environment is clean and safe. All of these things are much cheaper and effective when we pay for them collectively.

The taxes paid by previous generations benefits us today, and the taxes we pay hopefully act to benefit the generations of tomorrow.

David Brooks, conservative political pundit and commentator, and New York Times columnist
David Brooks. Toronto-born American centre-right, self-described “moderate centrist” political pundit and cultural commentator who writes for The New York Times

In 2016, New York Times columnist and PBS political commentator David Brooks wrote about the difference between taxpayers and citizens …

You can be a taxpayer or you can be a citizen. If you’re a taxpayer your role in the country is defined by your economic and legal status. Your primary identity is individual. You’re perfectly within your rights to do everything you legally can to look after your self-interest.The problem with the taxpayer mentality is that you end up serving your individual interest short term but soiling the nest you need to be happy in over the long term.

A healthy nation isn’t just an atomized mass of individual economic and legal units. A nation is a web of giving and getting. You give to your job, and your employer gives to you. You give to your neighbourhood, and your neighbourhood gives to you. You give to your government, and your government gives to you.

If you orient everything around individual self-interest, you end up ripping the web of giving and receiving. Neighbours can’t trust neighbours. Individuals can’t trust their institutions, and they certainly can’t trust their government. Everything that is not explicitly prohibited is permissible. Everybody winds up suspicious and defensive and competitive. You wind up alone at 3 a.m. miserably tweeting out at your enemies.

And this is exactly the atomized mentality that is corroding North America.

Years ago, David Foster Wallace put it more gently …

“It may sound reactionary, I know. But we can all feel it. We’ve changed the way we think of ourselves as citizens. We don’t think of ourselves as citizens in the old sense of being small parts of something larger and infinitely more important to which we have serious responsibilities. We do still think of ourselves as citizens in the sense of being beneficiaries — we’re actually conscious of our rights as citizens and our nation’s responsibilities to us and ensuring we get our share of the American pie.”

This is where the Canadian Taxpayers Federation comes in, a shady, secretly-funded (who are, in fact, funded by right wing elements within Canada’s corporate culture), unrepresentative organization that sells itself as a populist “citizens advocacy group” looking to cut waste and ensure accountability in government, when such couldn’t be further from the truth.

Income tax

Larry Haiven, a professor in the faculty of management at Saint Mary’s University in Halifax, says most of CTF’s stances on issues — and particularly their relentless calls to lower taxes — are …

“the most simplistic garbage. It assumes that nothing that is purchased with our taxes is of any use for us. Despite CTF’s anti-tax, spending-is-out-of-control rhetoric, taxes are lower now than they’ve been in decades, leaving governments struggling to provide essential services.

Provinces and the federal government have been cutting taxes frenetically, frantically, for the past 25 years. Governments across Canada are taking in about $250 billion less than they did 15 years ago. You have to weigh that against everything the Taxpayers Federation says.”

Yet night in, night out the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is given a platform on the corporate-owned and operated evening news, with folks on Shaw-owned Global TV, anchors like Chris Gailus and Sophie Liu, and Bell Media CTV Vancouver hosts Scott Roberts and Mi-Jung Lee fulfilling their supplicant role as handmaidens to their corporate bosses & not on our side.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation media presence is truly remarkable when you consider it has a membership of five people.

You read that correctly: five.

money.jpg

Writes Dougald Lamont for CBC News Manitoba

This might come as a surprise, but the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is not now, nor has it ever been, a grassroots, member-based organization where anyone can pay $10 to sign up (or sign up free) and have a say in how the organization is run.

Instead, it has supporters — about 90,000 of them, who, like followers on Facebook, can like, comment, answer surveys and make donations, but they have no actual say in how the organization is run.

While the CTF’s mandate is to hold elected officials to account, who holds the CTF’s five members to account? Each other. Who decides who else can become a member? They do. It should be no surprise that the Canadian Taxpayers Federation has, as a result, faced accusations of being an Astroturf organization — a fake grassroots organization.

Writing in The Tyee, journalist David J. Climenhaga says the following …

Charles and David Koch, right-wing American billionaires
Right-wing billionaires Charles and David Koch are among the funders of the international Atlas Network, a Canadian Taxpayers Federation partner. Photo credit: DonkeyHotey.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation,” writes Climenhaga, “a self-described non-partisan tax watchdog and taxpayer advocacy group once headed by Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, has always been tight-lipped about the sources of its own funding and support. This may be mildly ironic, given its vocal demands for transparency in government policy.”

Since the 1980’s and the rise of the Koch brothers in the U.S. and the Canadian Taxpayers Federation in Canada, there has been a deliberate effort to reframe citizens as “taxpayers” and public spending as “taxpayers’ money,” as if taxpayers are shareholders. CBC’s Dougald Lamont writes …

Journalists and politicians in every political party routinely use these terms without considering that this framing is anti-democratic. That is because politicians are elected by citizens, not just taxpayers. The word “taxpayer” is not in the constitution; the word “citizen” is.

All citizens are equal. Taxpayers are not.

It is self-evident that you can contribute to the economy and society without paying taxes. Many citizens don’t pay income taxes, notably children, the working poor and a few millionaires and billionaires. Charities, churches and places of faith are all tax-exempt.

Defining taxpayers as the only people who matter has real and serious consequences for policy. It is not a politically neutral position: it is a radical right-wing ideology that drives inequality by making the rich richer while neglecting the poor.

That is why the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s real membership of five people matters, as does its ideology. We don’t have to care what they think, but we should be clear on just where they are coming from.

So the next time you hear British Columbia’s new wicked witch of the west, CTF spokesperson Kris Sims, blathering on your TV about how your “taxpayer dollars” are being wasted, remember: Kris Sims and the Canadian Taxpayers Federation could give a damn about you as a citizen of the province of British Columbia, and could care even less about what our provincial government is doing to alleviate child poverty, build urgent care centres to serve the 780,000 British Columbians without a family doctor, build truly affordable housing for seniors and working people across the vast expanse of our province, create affordable $10-a-day child care for working families, while funding our public safety and justice, education, transportation and infrastructure, agriculture and fisheries, climate action and environment, social development and poverty reduction, indigenous relations and reconciliation, and jobs, training, trade and technology ministries of government to better serve your interests, and the interests of your family, your neighbours, your co-workers, and your friends.

And while you’re at it, ignore Kris Sims when you see her next on your TV!

Disinhibition, Coarseness & Social Cantagion In The Age of Trump

Disinhibition, Coarseness, Anti-Semitism and Social Cantagion In The Age of Trump

Two centuries ago, a wave of suicides swept across Europe as if the very act of suicide was somehow infectious.
Shortly before their untimely deaths, many of the suicide victims had come into contact with Johann von Goethe’s tragic tale The Sorrows of Young Werther, in which the hero, Werther, himself commits suicide. In an attempt to stem what was seen as a rising tide of imitative suicides, anxious authorities banned the book in several regions across Europe.
During the two hundred years that have followed the publication and subsequent censorship of Goethe’s novel, social scientific research has largely confirmed the thesis that affect, attitudes, beliefs and behaviour can indeed spread through populations as if they were somehow infectious.
Simple exposure sometimes appears to be a sufficient condition for social transmission to occur. This is social contagion theory; that sociocultural phenomena can spread through and leap between people like outbreaks of measles or chicken pox rather than through a process of rational choice.
The online disinhibition effect is a term used to describe the lowering of psychological restraints, a seeming inability to regulate our behaviors in an online social environment leading to reduced behavioural inhibitions online, and a negating of normative behavioural boundaries while in cyberspace, resulting in destructive interpersonal behaviors while using social media.
Welcome to the Age of Trump, the age of unreason and disinformation, of Russian bots and the spreading of racial hatred, the targeting of minority populations as “the other”, the rise of anti-Semitism, rampant cynicism, misplaced anger, isolation and the breakdown of contemporary society.

Germany to fight rising anti-SemitismGermany to fight anti-Semitism. Children learn about Holocaust at Berlin Jewish school.

On Saturday, May 25th, Felix Klein, the German government’s anti-Semitism commissioner, told the Funke media group

“I cannot advise Jews to wear the kippah everywhere in Germany. Jews should think twice before wearing the traditional kippah skullcap in public arising from a recent and sustained rise in attacks against Jews.

Anti-Semitism has always existed in Germany, but in this new era of social dysfunction, brought on in some measure by the odious conduct of the U.S. President, anti-Semitism is now showing its ugly face more openly.

There is no question that the rise in social disinhibition and coarseness has played a role in the worsening situation we’re currently experiencing in Europe. The internet and social media have also strongly contributed to this — and also to the continuous attacks on our culture of remembrance.

The word Jew as an insult was not common in my time when I went to school. Now, in the early part of the 21st century, it is and it’s even an insult at schools where there are no Jews, where there are no Jewish students. So that is a growing concern and of course we have to develop strategies to counter that, in Germany and across Europe.”

Toxic disinhibition, an empathy deficit, the absence of restraint — and online, anonymity, invisibility and intermittent, unfledged asynchronous communication are far from benign in their impacts, not only on social discourse, but at the ballot box and in each and every one of our lives, where increasingly otherwise good people live without conscience, informed social awareness, and their role in the social collective we call Canada.

Donald Trump hovering over Hillary Clinton on the debate stage in the 2016 United States election

The 2016 American election was one of the ugliest elections in the history of the United States. Hillary Clinton was continually subject to unwarranted attacks, and daily demonized online. Not a day went by in the lead up to the November 8, 2016 U.S. election when I didn’t find myself outraged at the “sharing” — by a broad range of people on the left with whom I had worked over many years — of Russian bot disinformation, and misogynist commentary about the “war-mongering” U.S. Senator & Secretary of State.
Speaking at a Liberal fundraiser in Toronto last October, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told those who were gathered at the Danforth Music Hall the upcoming federal election would be the ugliest election in Canadian history.

“We are now looking at perhaps what will be the most divisive and negative and nasty political campaign in Canada’s history,” Trudeau said. “I can tell you, we will do the same thing we did in 2015: No personal attacks, strong differentiation on issues of policy. I will not engage in personal attacks and none of our team will either.

A positive, compelling message that brings people together, that refuses the politics of personal attacks, that refuses the politics of division of scare tactics — whether it’s snitch lines or hijab attacks — that kind of approach that Stephen Harper tried does not work.

Once you’ve gone and divided and angered people in order to get elected it becomes very difficult afterward to pull them together in a way that actually allows us to solve the challenges that we need to solve. To run on division and fear and easy populism makes it harder to do the good things that must be the central purpose of why we run for office.”

Make no mistake, with $65 million in corporate funds already in the kitty for the federal Conservative party to wage their 2019 electoral campaign, with a lesser $41 million available to the Trudeau Liberals, and a paltry $5 million and $3 million, respectively, for Jagmeet Singh’s New Democratic Party of Canada and Elizabeth May’s Green Party of Canada, Andrew Scheer’s far right-of-centre social Conservative party is ready to wage that nasty, ugly campaign Justin Trudeau has talked about to crowds across Canada who have gathered to hear our Prime Minister.

Fight to Defeat Coarseness, Social Contagion, Disinhibition & Isolation
As Canadians, we can do our part by keeping our online discourse respectful, sticking to the facts, not sharing or retweeting the disinformation that will surely be provided by the Russian bots invading our social media, by joining the Greens, the New Democrats or the federal Liberal party, to donate time and money, to work on the campaigns of the socially progressive candidates we support, to staff the candidates’ offices, to go door knocking, gather with others in burmashaves in neighbourhoods, across our city and in Metro Vancouver — and make a difference, fight for inclusion & have a positive impact on the outcome of the election, in order that diversity, climate action, transit, infrastructure, affordable housing, continued subsidy funding of housing co-ops, preservation of our coasts, and preservation of the Canada Child Benefit introduced by the Trudeau government in 2016 that has served to reduce child poverty in Canada by 40%, or 300,000 children, since its introduction only three short years ago, will remain atop the political agenda in Canadian federal governance.