Monthly Archives: May 2004

The Bush Administration’s Continuing Denial of Human Rights
The Iraqi Prison Abuse Scandal: Reaping What It Has Sown


RUMSFELD-SENATE-HEARING


The Senate hearing into the abuse of Iraqi prisoners; click on photo for story




The fallout from the abuse, by American soldiers, of prisoners detained at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison continues.
Joe Conason, in Salon, provides insight into a report by human rights lawyers which found that the Abu Ghraib abuse was not only lawless — it was sanctioned by Pentagon political appointees.
Chicago Sun-Times columnist Neil Sternberg, in a compelling and readable column, suggests that President Bush is wrong to say prison abuse is inconsistent with the nature and temperment of Americans. Read why.
The New York Times reports on the life and current status of Pfc. Lynndie England, the female national guardsman featured so prominently in the Iraqi abuse photos.
The Times also presents a timeline, titled “Prison Abuses: Military Actions Taken and When Top Officials Knew.”
Update: ITV reports allegations of a “girl as young as 12 (who) was stripped and beaten by military personnel.” National Public Radio in the U.S. offers this audio report, by Jackie Northam, providing detail and insight into the report issued yesterday by the International Committee of the Red Cross on the coalition forces’ treatment of persons held in Iraq.
And, finally in this update on the scandal that is rocking the Bush White House …
Yale law professor Jack Balkin writes that the Bush “administration wanted secrecy. It wanted to be free of legal constraint. It wanted to do whatever it wanted whenever it wanted without ever having to be called to account for it.” Balkin goes on to suggest that in denying the prisoners in Iraq (as well as Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay) the usual protections of the Bill of Rights — including the presumption of innocence, the right to counsel, the right to know the charges against them, and the writ of habeas corpus to test the legality of their detention if they are placed in jail — the Bush administration is now “reaping what it has sown.”

A Monster of A Mess: Critics Say ‘Stay Away From Van Helsing’


VANHELSING


The reviews for the first big summertime movie blockbuster, Van Helsing, are in and it’s not looking good for Universal Pictures.
The range of reviewer criticism available at Rotten Tomatoes — where the film receives a 4.2 rating on a scale of one to ten, with 96 out of 123 critics conferring the film with ‘rotten’ status — include derisive commentary from Owen Gleiberman at Entertainment Weekly, “a long, kinetic, yet dreary mess” to James Berardinelli’s “the worst would-be summer blockbuster since Battlefield Earth.”
VanRamblings found the $145 million Van Helsing to be little more than a Grade-B Saturday afternoon monster flick, a silly-verging-on-stupid waste of time, money and resources, and utterly forgettable movie fare. Here’s hoping that Troy has more to offer.

Stupid President Tricks Can Only Be Seen On Letterman


LETTERMAN


When it comes to political jokers, David Letterman beats Jay Leno and critics’ darling Jon Stewart hands down.
It makes sense that the late-night talk-show wars, just passing their 10-year anniversary, would continue to consume audience interest. With each passing day, David Letterman — who seems to have developed a comfort level at CBS, even as he continues to make ironic detachment a way of life for several generations of fans — becomes ever more honest and human, allowing for a darker, more mature side to his comic’s take on life. More grounded than the competition, there’s genuine power to his words, particularly since his recovery from heart surgery.
Jay Leno, meanwhile, remains the guy who will do anything for ratings, most obviously when it involves some degree of political partisanship, like the kind that gave Arnold Schwarzenegger’s recall-candidacy, last year, the shove it needed to take California’s governorship.
In a recent article published in L.A. Weekly, Nikke Finke (an archive of her work is available as a link, to your left, under Cinema) writes …

Late Show has the brass balls to go where the cowardly White House news corps and corporate suck-up Leno fear to tread: presenting Dubya in all his dumb-ass glory.

Finke’s article is well worth a read.
As always, Slate continues to publish regular Bushisms, a malaprop version of the U.S. president’s accidental wit and wisdom.

VanRamblings Evolves: A Few Technical Changes


VANCOUVER-AT-NIGHT


Change is in the air in this sparkling picture of Vancouver’s waterfront, at night




VanRamblings’ tech genius, Michael Klassen, implemented a few changes to the blog today that we’d been talking about for awhile.
Effective today, if you want to e-mail (my spelling, Michael insists that email — without the dash — is the correct spelling) any article published on VanRamblings, on the post line below each published article Michael has implemented an “email to a friend” facility.
More salutary changes: on the right-hand side of the page (including all of the category pages, effective today), you’ll find a monthly archive of all articles ever published on VanRamblings, dating back to February 8, 2004 (a week before the official ‘birth’ of the blog you’re reading).
As always, in the keyword ‘site search’ a searchable archive of VanRamblings articles remains available to readers. Archives of all site articles are also available by clicking on the category buttons at the top of the page, or any one of the category items along the right-hand side.
Comments now come up in the Permalink feature (Permalink is also a new addition), rather than as a pop-up.
There are more ‘technical’ changes on their way in the months to come. The focus of VanRamblings, though, remains on regularly updated (and with the exception of The Unbelievable Truth) readable, timely, pungent content.