Tag Archives: erin o’toole

#CdnPoli | Erin O’Toole | The Times and Travails of Canada’s Tory Leader

Poor Erin O’Toole, the beleaguered leader of the Conservative Party of Canada.

When Mr. O’Toole ran for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada, or order to defeat his  main rival, Nova Scotia’s Peter MacKay — a well-experienced senior Minister of the Crown in the near decade the Conservatives held power in Ottawa, from early 2006 through until late 2015 — Mr. O’Toole fashioned himself as a True Blue, Harperite social conservative who, although he would not allow a vote on abortion on the floor of the House of Commons were he to become Prime Minister of Canada, stood with and for the socially conservative values held by many members of the Conservative Party.

In a ranked ballot vote held on 0, in order to secure victory and the leadership of the Conservative Party, the former Minister of Veterans Affairs in the Stephen Harper government, Erin O’Toole, explicitly sought the support of socially conservative leadership hopefuls, Leslyn Lewis and Derek Sloan, to secure the winning votes in the 3rd round of voting, with 19,271 winning ballots cast in his favour, with his rival MacKay securing only 14,528 votes.

First time leadership hopeful, Leslyn Lewis, had finished in third place on the second ballot with 10,140 votes — many of those votes going to O’Toole on the third ballot. Sloan finished last on the first ballot, with 4,864 votes. Mere months later, on January 18, 2021, Erin O’Toole kicked Derek Sloan out of the Conservative caucus. Note should be made that when Mr. O’Toole recently appointed elected members of the Conservative Party to form the Opposition’s Shadow Cabinet, social conservative Leslyn Lewis did not make the cut.

During the recent federal election, much to the chagrin of the Conservative candidates seeking election or re-election, when Erin O’Toole released the Conservative Party platform early in the campaign, in mid-August, Tory candidates were taken aback that the party’s platform came out foresquare in favour of a carbon tax — contrary to long standing Conservative party policy.

In fact, the Tory platform read, as many disgruntled Conservative Party members complained, as a “red” document, or a Liberal Party lite policy document.

In order to win over Canadians who live in the vote rich Metro Toronto and Metro Vancouver regions of Canada, Erin O’Toole had created a platform document that almost entirely jettisoned Conservative Party dogma, and where it didn’t, during the course of the election campaign, O’Toole “re-adjusted” Tory policy on the fly, all in the hopes of securing centrist urban votes.

The appeasement strategy did not work — under O’Toole’s leadership, the Tories lost four  Metro Vancouver seats, while standing pat in Metro Toronto, where the Liberal Party went onto win a near overwhelming victory.

Erin O’Toole’s Conservative Party enters the House of Commons down two seats, in a party riven by division, with a petition launched days ago by prominent Tory Senator Denise Batters calling for a leadership review within 6 months, specifically pointing to Mr. O’Toole’s loss of the 2021 federal election, and his party policy reversals during the course of the election campaign.

To make matters worse for Mr. O’Toole, as the 44th session of the Canadian Parliament gets underway, at a press conference held yesterday morning in Ottawa, Government House Leader Mark Holland told reporters that he believes it would be “statistically improbable” for several Tory MPs to have valid medical exemptions to COVID-19 vaccination — and those who do have them should provide “assurances” they were given for legitimate reasons.

“The Conservative caucus is 119 people,” Mr. Holland told reporters. “Statistically, the likelihood that they would have multiple people who are exempt … is extraordinarily low. There might be some possibility of it but I suppose there’s a possibility that that chair could fly,” he said, pointing to a chair in the room.

If one Conservative MP is claiming an exemption, Holland said, that is “exceptionally unlikely but possible.” More than one Conservative MP claiming an exemption, he said, would be “statistically impossible.”

To be fair, Erin O’Toole’s centrist position on the issues will play much better with the electorate and all but assure the Conservatives victory at the polls, when voters tire of the Liberal Party. Politics is like major sport, though: you’re ‘hired’ … only to be fired at some point in the not-too-distant future.

Still and all, Mr. O’Toole is hardly signaling defeat at the beginning of the current session of Parliament.

Mr. O’Toole has stipulated that battling inflation will be top of mind, by re-naming Mr. Mean, Pierre Poilievre, as his finance critic earlier this month. Poilievre has repeatedly warned about the risk of inflation during the pandemic, and has lately taken aim at the $101.4-billion stimulus package promised in the spring budget, which he now dubs the “$100-billion slush fund.”

In an interview on Friday, O’Toole told National Post columnist John Ivison that his party’s major focus will be on “the economic situation in the country.”

“There’s an inflation crisis, there’s lack of confidence, wages are flat, the cost of everything is going up, so people are actually losing purchasing power as if they were getting their wages cut, and we’ve never seen the country more fractured,” O’Toole said.

Tory House leader Gerald Deltell has said his party was supportive of the initial emergency spending on COVID-19 aid measures because of the unprecedented lockdowns that decimated the economy and forced businesses to close.

But the Tories will now argue that the government was too slow to adjust to changing circumstances, pumping too much money into the economy while running up massive deficits. The result, Deltell has said: businesses are having trouble finding workers & Canadian families are getting hit with rising prices.

For the most part, though, Mr. Deltell told reporters in a press conference held in Ottawa last week, that he could not get into whether his party will oppose various government policies until he sees what’s actually put forward on paper by the Liberals. The Conservative caucus met for two full days prior to the beginning of this session of Parliament to build a strategic political game plan.

“We have a strategy behind each and every issue,” says Deltell. “I can’t be wide open on the strategy right now.”

Here’s CPAC’s Peter Van Dusen in discussion on Parliament’s return, with the Toronto Star’s Susan Delacourt, the National Post’s John Ivison, and Globe and Mail Ottawa Bureau Chief, Ian Bailey …

See you all back here tomorrow. Thank you for reading VanRamblings.

Decision 2021 | Post Mortem, Part 3 | Wretched & Sad Woebegone Tories


Buh-bye, Erin —   don’t let the door hit you in the keester on your way out.  😢

Poor Erin O’Toole. The Tory leader is just hours, days or — at the very outside — weeks away from being deposed as leader of Canada’s Conservative Party.

Politics, can be a cruel and unforgiving mistress — particularly, when victory has been spurned. Winning two fewer seats in 2021 than Andrew Scheer achieved in 2019? The knives currently lodged in O’Toole’s back must hurt something fierce.

Erin O’Toole accused of betraying Conservatives. Faces leadership challenge.

The headline above was a Wednesday front page story in The Globe and Mail.

Bert Chen, an elected Ontario national council member, told the Globe’s Laura Stone & Ian Bailey that “many party members are upset with Mr. O’Toole’s attempt to make the party appear more centrist, which they believe resulted in the Tories’ loss of seats in Monday’s vote, as well as diminished support in urban areas.”

“The feedback from the members … is that Erin has betrayed their trust, and that Erin’s leadership based off of these results is a failure, and he needs to go,” Mr. Chen said in an interview with The Globe.

“Accountability and integrity are central to what Conservatives want out of a leader, which is why we don’t like Justin Trudeau. But Erin O’Toole has demonstrated he’s no better than Justin Trudeau.”

The Globe reports that Mr. Chen has launched an online petition to trigger a review of Mr. O’Toole’s leadership. The Conservative Party’s constitution says the national council is responsible for conducting referendums in response to valid petitions.

After the election, Erin O’Toole told party members that he, too, was disappointed with the Tories’ performance, and promised to launch a review of the party’s electoral strategy — but Mr. Chen said he doesn’t trust Mr. O’Toole’s review, and that the Conservative leader has not been contrite enough in his public comments about the election loss, adding that he was concerned that “Mr. O’Toole’s hardline comments about China had made Chinese-Canadians feel uncomfortable.”


Ousted Richmond, B.C. Tory MP Kenny Chiu says supporters ‘abandoned’ him in the 2021 election

Both Richmond Conservative MPs — Kenny Chiu, in Steveston-Richmond East, and Alice Wong, in Richmond Centre — lost their seats on election night to their Liberal Party challengers, 34-year-old Wilson Miao and Parm Bains, respectively.

As reported in the South China Morning Post

“Weeks after being comfortably elected in Steveston-Richmond East, one of Canada’s most ethnically Chinese electorates, Chiu was back in his birthplace of Hong Kong as an international monitor for the city’s district council elections.

He would go on to become Vice-Chair of Parliament’s subcommittee on international human rights, which sanctioned Chinese individuals and entities over alleged human rights violations in Xinjiang.

But now, after less than two years as an MP, Chiu is out, having suffered a hefty swing against him of 8.3 percentage points in Monday’s election.

The Chinese government sanctioned Chiu for his role on the rights committee, with China’s ambassador, Cong Peiwu, launching a thinly veiled attack on the Conservative. Chiu’s Tory colleague and fellow Hong Kong immigrant Alice Wong — a Tory MP since 2008 — suffered an even worse swing of 11.9%, in what was previously a Conservative stronghold. In total, the Tories lost 4 Lower Mainland seats.

Disaster looms unless the Conservative party (re)discovers what it stands for

Erin O’Toole won the Conservative Party leadership in 2019 in part because Tory members believed he could make the same sort of inroads in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) that Stephen Harper had in three successive elections.

In fact, the Liberals once again all but swept the GTA, with the Conservatives winning only a paltry and dispiriting 7 of 78 GTA seats, including Tory leader Erin O’Toole’s Durham seat. On a bleak night, gay Conservative icon, Melissa Lantsman (pictured above) — soon to become a star in the Tory caucus, and in the House of Commons (who’ll be entertaining as all get out) — managed to hang onto the Thornhill seat previously occupied by outgoing former Tory Minister, Peter Kent.

In general, Canada’s Conservative Party supports conservative social & economic policies & values, a strong federal system of government — while leaving the provinces alone in their areas of jurisdiction —  and the use of Canada’s armed forces in international peacekeeping missions — or, as the party states on its website …

The Conservative Party of Canada is founded on the principles of peace and freedom on the world stage; responsible management of taxpayers’ money; a welcoming land of refuge for the world’s persecuted and afflicted; the defence of clean Canadian technologies; and a clear understanding of responsibilities between levels of government.

In 2021, what values do members of the Conservative Party cherish, and what policies would members like to see implemented? Erin O’Toole proposed cutting the Liberal child care plan — to save billions of dollars of taxpayer money, he said — but then proposed a Conservative Party spending budget of well over $100 billion dollars, exceeding by more than $20 billion the Liberal Party spending plan.

So, any measure of fiscal responsibility and reduced government spending would seem not to be on the Conservative Party agenda, in 2021, or anytime soon.

During the Election, O’Toole flip flopped on gun control, climate change, abortion, and pandemic and spending policy — for anyone following the Election closely, their heads were left spinning, so frequent were the changes made on the fly to the Tory platform, angering the party’s base, and causing confusion among Canadians.

In 2021, is the Conservative Party the Progressive Conservative Party of old — the safely centrist and socially progressive tweedledum to the Liberals tweedledee, when it was difficult to tell one neoliberal party from the other — or is the Conservative Party of today, at its very heart and in the main, the raucous amalgam of western-based and socially and fiscally conservative Reform Alliance members that Stephen Harper managed to cobble together with Progressive Conservatives in 2003 as the new (sans Progressive) Conservative Party of Canada?

Although Erin O’Toole spoke with Stephen Harper each day of the campaign — Harper wanted to stay out of the Election fray for fear of alienating potential voters — the current, Erin O’Toole-led iteration of the Conservative Party seems to be suffering from a crisis of identity, far too left and spend thrifty for the Reform Alliance members in their party, and not nearly as progressive on social issues as many Tory members feel is warranted in the much-changed world that is 2021.

Conservative-minded Globe and Mail columnist John Ibbitson and Ipsos-Reid CEO Darrell Bricker wrote in their book, The Big Shift, that the 21st century belongs to the Conservative Party as much as the 20th century belonged to the Liberal Party.

But they’re wrong, dead wrong.

In fact, the Conservative Party is a corporatist political party in its death throes, with a group of neanderthal malcontent members who want to reclaim a world that never was, a Trumpian, nearly all white nirvana where men ruled the roost, and women stayed home barefoot and pregnant, raising the kids, and making fer damn sure, her husband’s dinner was on the table when he got home from work.

History moves inexorably forward, and change for the better always occurs

On Monday, April 15, 1912, after striking an iceberg during her maiden voyage from Southampton to New York City, the British passenger liner, the Titanic, sank in the frigid waters of the North Atlantic. More than 1500 women, men and children — out of an estimated 2,224 passengers and crew onboard that fateful night — died a watery death in the deadliest peacetime sinking of a cruise ship to date.

All but a handful of the third class passengers in the below decks died, while almost all of the passengers traveling in the top decks, first class accommodation managed to get off the ship and onto the boats and life rafts — of which there were far too few to meet the needs of all of the passengers onboard, going on to live productive lives. Not so for the families of the passengers traveling in third class.

For weeks, months and years following the sinking of the Titanic, the New York Times published hundreds of stories on the rank indifference of a society that would allow the “lower classes” to die with nary a consideration, while better valuing the lives of the first class passengers, most of whom survived — unlike the poor children, women and men in the below decks. The furor that was raised by the New York Times’ relentless years-long coverage of the tragedy of the sinking of the Titanic lead to fundamental and substantive change in societies across the world, and a re-definition of a person’s worth, not determined by the money or position s/he held but rather by the character and the familial bonds common to all people.

Over the past century, unions organized workers, creating a new and vibrant middle class; access to a post secondary education expanded dramatically across the population, creating opportunity; women not only got the vote but the feminist movement that began a century ago blossoms through until this day, making the lives of girls and women that much better, with access to opportunity a fundamental tenet of the rise of the cause of women and girls; members of the LGBTQ2+ population have come out of hiding, so that today we celebrate the community daily, same sex marriage is a common feature of western society, and annually in small & large communities, we participate in Pride Day parades and ceremonies.

Which is all by way of saying: history moves inexorably forward, as it always has.

We are not going back to the mean old days of a Stephen Harper, a Mike Harris or a first-term Gordon Campbell, and neither will Canadians elect a regressive Conservative Party to the halls of power in Ottawa. Before the end of the century, private property will have become a thing of our unjust past, as co-operative and community-owned housing becomes the order of the day, and the norm; rights will continue to expand, as we recognize that the exercise of our rights entails a responsibility to the larger community around us; women, men, children, persons of colour, minority and immigrant communities will all work together, as we achieve our goal of an inclusive and more just society that serves the interests of all.

And, yes, that means the New Democratic Party will become Canada’s political party of the 21st century, our country’s natural governing party, consigning a still progressive but not progressive enough Liberal Party as a perpetual opposition party — or, more likely, proportional representation will carry the day, in order that all Canadian voices might be heard, Canada still very much in the years to come a leading progressive country, dedicated to social and economic justice for all.


Decision 2021 | Day 23 | Hoodwinking Canadians on Climate Change

https://giverdigitalstudyguide.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/4/5/47458811/4582725_orig.png

On social media the other day, Sandy Garossino — a retired Crown Counsel, national journalist and political pundit — told her readers on Twitter that this election, and for her every election going forward, would be about one thing …

All elections determine the character of a country for the next four years.

And they have a lot to say about what the world will feel like, too. But this election may determine the flavour of the next four millennia — maybe the next 40. That’s because time is the one thing we can’t recover, and time is the one thing we’ve just about run out of in the climate fight.

Electing an Erin O’Toole-led Conservative Party would push Canada backwards fast, and would cost us dearly. Writes Max Fawcett in the National Observer

The now-defunct Northern Gateway pipeline project is both a monument to the failed Harper-era policy of petro-nationalism and a testament to the power of Indigenous communities and those fighting for their rights. It’s emblematic of a past when concerns about climate change were far less important to the government of Canada than the interests of Alberta’s oil and gas sector.

Tankers could crash off B.C.’s west coast carrying Alberta crude

And for some strange reason, Erin O’Toole wants to bring it back from the dead — which would deal a fatal blow to any hope Canada has of reaching its net-zero emissions targets by 2050. This contradiction is at the heart of the climate plan O’Toole is trying to sell to Canadians. We are well past the point where we can delude ourselves into thinking we can have our cake and eat it, too, on climate change.

Fawcett goes on to quote Globe and Mail columnist Andrew Coyne, “The Conservatives don’t want a plan that works, still less one they might actually have to implement. They just want a plan they can wave around for a while, then discard.” If Canadian voters genuinely care about climate change, writes Fawcett, they’ll do themselves a favour and put O’Toole’s plan in the trash can — before he gets a chance to do it himself.

As respected Québec environmentalist and Liberal Party candidate in the riding of Laurier—Sainte-Marie, Steven Guilbeault, wrote recently …

“Erin O’Toole has made the Conservative party a home for dinosaurs. The following examples just barely scratch the surface of the climate change denial rampant in the Conservative Party of Canada.”

Here are a few examples of where Mr. Guilbeault’s concerns arise, that barely scratch the surface of the climate change denial rampant within the Conservative Party of Canada.

In Red Deer-Lacombe, Erin O’Toole’s Conservative Party candidate Blaine Calkins was caught spreading misinformation to children, saying “whether or not you think carbon dioxide is pollution or not is, I still think, a question.”

Professor accuses Alberta MP of spreading ‘climate misinformation’

In the North Okanagan-Shuswap, Erin O’Toole’s Conservative candidate is the enthusiastically endorsed Mel Arnold, who has questioned whether humans are the main cause of climate change — arguing that there is no scientific consensus.

North Okanagan-Shuswap Tory candidate questions science on climate change

In Cariboo-Prince George, O’Toole’s candidate Todd Doherty couldn’t bring himself to say that climate change was caused by human activity and claimed it was due to “adding more and more bodies to the room.”

There’s a video very much worth watching embedded in the tweet below.

In Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, Cheryl Gallant has a long history of climate change denial, including having stated that: “alarmist claims about ‘man-made’ global warming have cost the Ontario government tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs.”

Ontario Conservative MP Cheryl Gallant writes over-the-top climate change rant

In Kelowna—Lake Country, Erin O’Toole’s Conservative Party candidate Tracy Gray skated and refused to give a straight answer when pushed on whether human activity is the cause of climate change, in an interview with CBC Daybreak Kelowna.

In Miramichi-Grand Lake, Erin O’Toole’s anti-choice Conservative Party candidate Jake Stewart has called environmental activists eco terrorists.

In Don Valley North, Erin O’Toole’s candidate Sabrina Zuniga has downplayed the environmental impacts of oil spills, claiming that “oil is natural … so spilling into the environment, the land will absorb it because that’s what oil is.”

Ontario Spadina-Fort York Tory candidate Sabrina Zuniga says oil is absorbed in soil, with absolutely no damage to the environment — because oil is a natural substance.

In Cloverdale—Langley City, favourite Erin O’Toole and Andrew Scheer candidate Tamara Jansen called reports of rising CO2 levels “scare mongering” and referred to scientists warning about climate change as pushing “climate change dogma.”

Cloverdale—Langley City Conservative Candidate Tamara Jansen Promoted The Idea That the Earth Was Created in 6 Days, Casting Doubt on Evolution and Climate Change, while others rally to express concern about Ms. Jansen’s extremist anti-choice views .

In Yorkton—Melville, Tory candidate Cathay Wagantall has suggested climate action is a conspiracy to hurt workers, while in Battlefords-Lloydminster, candidate Rosemarie Falk believes that the Tories need to think about: “Gen Z, which has grown up their whole lives being fed climate alarmism.”

In Québec, Trois-Rivieres, Conservative Party candidate Yves Levesque said the quiet part out loud, “as an elected official, as a person, that we’re going to destroy the planet, well we’re going to do it in a pragmatic way without lowering your purchasing power.”

In Shefford, Québec, Erin O’Toole’s preferred candidate, Céline Lalancette, denies the very existence of the human causes of climate change, telling the media: “humans are not responsible for climate change, it has never been proven” and “the universe will do what it has to do.”

Tory Céline Lalancette denies existence of human causes of climate change

Well, that’s it for VanRamblings for this Monday, September 6th, a hyperbole-free column (well, almost) on a few of the less savoury folks who comprise the Conservative Party of Canada candidate corral — not exactly the most progressive amalgam of candidates who you’d choose to cast a ballot for, or in this case, not cast a ballot for … but rally against, if you care at all about our world.

You do — and won’t vote Conservative in the 2021 Canadian federal election.


Decision 2021 | Day 18 | Tories | Hoodwinking Canadians | Part 1

erin-o-toole-flag.jpg

In his column in the August 30th edition of The Georgia Straight online, Now Magazine political editor Enzo DiMatteo asks the question, “Has Erin O’Toole got Canadians hoodwinked? — as witness today’s headline above.

The sub-headline for DiMatteo’s story asks if Canadian voters aren’t being “seduced” by a more palatable, re-packaged version of Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole, reminding readers of last weekend’s violent anti-vaxx mob rallies in Bolton and Cambridge, Ontario, where Conservative party supporters and campaign workers — the base of the Tory party? — provided insight into the hate spewing values that represent the core beliefs of, perhaps, a significant contingent of Conservative party members, and what an intolerant 2021 anti-democratic Tory party really stands for.

“Mostly by flying under the radar and keeping the seamier anti-vaxxers, anti-maskers and conspiracy theorists in his base (not to mention his caucus) quiet … the party is spending lots of cash on social media polishing O’Toole’s everyman image with photo opportunities of the Conservative leader playing with Fido and feeding llamas (or were they alpacas?). It’s quite a stretch from the photoshopped images of O’Toole the party had been sharing on Twitter to make him look more buff.

The Globe and Mail's Chief Political Correspondent writes that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is

QAnon. Yellow Vesters. Flat earthers. They’re all part of the Con base (and growing) since Stephen Harper began stoking populist and Western separatist sentiment (not to mention Islamophobia) in the party more than a decade ago.

Q-Anon supporters of the Conservative Party of Canada

As Conservative poll numbers rise, many voters seem to have forgotten about the Trumpeteers that occupy the lower rungs of the party. Make no mistake. They’re the same folks who voted for “True Blue” O’Toole during the party leadership. Remember him? The campaign team behind O’Toole then are the same ones responsible for the homophobia-tinged crusade in the 2018 Ontario election against Kathleen Wynne.

While O’Toole has tried to present himself as a moderate conservative out for the little guy, it’s not the version of conservatism that the party he oversees actually stands for. There’s no progressive in this conservatism. Truth is, many don’t believe in climate change. They don’t believe in (or see) the need for mandatory vaccinations during a public health crisis. They don’t believe in gun control. They don’t really believe in LGBTQ rights. They don’t believe in a woman’s right to choose. Many of them don’t even believe the pandemic is real.

On Sunday, August 29th Georgia Straight editor Charlie Smith, asked what turned out to be a provocative question, “Do you know the most popular white supremacist slogan in the world?” The answer: “Here it is: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”

Conservative Party of Canada election slogan, "Secure the Future, Fuck Trudeau"

Charlie Smith goes on to write that he was curious to know if the Conservative Party’s campaign slogan, “Secure the Future”, had ever been used in other political campaigns. Turns out it has. Surprise, surprise. White nationalists just love the Klan notion of “securing the future” for whites.

Enzo DiMatteo pointed out in a column published earlier this year …

“O’Toole has adopted the Trumpian language of the far-right, railing against ‘cancel culture,’ fuelling suggestions that the Liberal government’s pandemic response is part of a socialist ‘Great Reset’ and pulling out the dog whistle on China and the coronavirus every chance he gets.”

In his article, Mr. Smith references a Georgia Straight column written by academic and community activist, Stuart Parker, who is curious as to why Erin O’Toole on August 19th introduced the legalization of amyl nitrate and other “poppers” as an issue of importance in the Canadian election.

“Poppers,” Parker writes, “became known as a gay party drug in the 80s and until the past decade were primarily associated with the gay club scene and online casual sex through applications like Grindr.” Asks Parker, “Why would O’Toole get his health critic Michelle Rempel to raise the legalization of poppers in correspondence with the Minister of Health and follow up with a headline-grabbing poppers legalization announcement?”

Parker believes that Erin O’Toole is making his first intentional, programmatic, planned play for what is known in Trump world as “The Porno Right” — the Incel crowd comprised of typically single or otherwise sexually unfulfilled males whose online world focuses on hate for gender-feminists, who consume an abundance of misogynistic porn (including anal rape) on 4Chan, 8Chan, Pornhub, and XHamster, their hate fuelled by mass consumption of amyl nitrate and an assortment of other “poppers”.

End gender violence

Parker ends his article in the August 20th edition of The Straight, writing …

“But let us recognize that O’Toole’s announcement has very little to do with the health of gay men or even that of career masturbators. But it has everything to do with the Porno Right coming of age as a political constituency that, like its adversaries in the Christian Right, must mostly be courted through coded communication and dog-whistles, dog-whistles that arrived in Canadian politics in Ottawa with the announcement of the legalization of the drug of choice for the Incel Porno Right constituency within the Conservative Party of Canada.”

As we have written previously, Erin O’Toole’s Reform/Alliance Conservative Party hues closer in its leanings to the belief system espoused by QAnon conspiracy theorists, as they gain more influence with each passing day.