Stories of a Life | Raymond & Cathy Marry 50 Years Ago Today

Raymond Tomlin and Cathy McLean on the days leading up to their marriage, December 19th, 1970

Cathy Janie McLean and Raymond Neil Tomlin were married at Pilgrim United Church in North Edmonton, the church Cathy had attended with her family since moving to Edmonton to begin high school, on a near frozen Edmonton Saturday, December 19th, 1970 afternoon, at 1:30 p.m.
Outside the sun shone, the weather a nippy but not unseasonable -35°. There were several in attendance who expressed their dismay that the sun was streaming into the church during the ceremony, something which I never quite understood. For me, it was like being blessed by God.
The marriage occurred almost a year-to-the-day since I had first met a bedraggled dirty-blonde, long-haired Cathy, very much a hippie, huddling with her friend and University of Alberta roommate, Joy, who were at the Royal Towers Hotel in New Westminster, as we waited for the Greyhound bus to transport us into Vancouver. Long story short, Cathy and I, and Joy and my friend Charles, hung out over the next few days, prior to Cathy and Joy returning to Edmonton. In the spring of 1970, I hitchhiked out to Edmonton, without any prior notice to Cathy of my intention to do so, and stayed with Cathy for a week, when we made love for the first time.
Cathy travelled out to Vancouver with her mother that summer in 1970, and rather than return home with her mother, Cathy remained in Vancouver. By mid-August the two of us were living together. Four months later, on Saturday, December 19th, 1970 the two of us were married.


Bren Traff, CKLG, 1967

The best man at my wedding was Bren Traff. Here’s a very brief, 6-second clip of Bren recorded in 1967, as he was starting off his CKLG 20-20 newscast. Later Bren would take over weekend CKLG-AM mornings, and later still, with almost every other deejay in town, move to a renewed CFUN — which had dropped its money-losing CKVN, Vancouver’s Voice of News format, returning to a tried-and-true rock ‘n roll format in the 1970s. Bren had been my best friend from 1966, right through until February 1972, which is a story to be told on VanRamblings another day.

In addition, another friend of mine, Hal Weaver — who, at the time, was the morning rock jock at CKVN — asked if he could be a co-best man at the wedding; I asked Cathy if that was alright with her, and she said it was fine. At some point, I’ll write about the last show, on CJOR from midnight to 6 a.m. Hal performed, a show he called Sunday Morning Coming Down, flat out the best radio programme in all of Vancouver radio history.
Hal Weaver is considered by many to have been one of the best, straight ahead Canadian-born rock jocks — a title he shares with others, including Daryl B. and Terry David Mulligan. Hal had a dynamic personality and voice to match. In 1968, J. Robert Wood hired him at CHUM Toronto, where he stayed for two years before moving to Vancouver’s CKVN in 1970. Hal died of throat cancer at the age of 28 in December, 1971, in Surrey, B.C. At the time Hal asked to be a co-best man, he’d already been diagnosed.

Cathy mother’s Myrtle insisted that Cathy stay at her home, just down the street from the church, in the days leading up to the wedding, while Hal, Bren and I stayed at a nearby hotel. The only time Cathy and I saw one another in the week leading up to our wedding, was when we met with the church pastor to talk about our vows, and our commitment to one another. Most of those meetings with the pastor had Cathy and I arguing with one another — if I recall correctly, the arguments were a consequence of an utter lack of maturity (not to mention, quite a bit of insecurity) on my part.
Cathy also insisted on changing the vows to read, “As long as we both shall love“, from “As long as we both shall live,” a change the pastor opposed, but Cathy dug in her heals on the issue, and of course got her way. That particular changing of the vows should have been the first hint I recognized that this was a marriage not to last for the long term — but I was so head over heels in love with Cathy that the thought never occurred to me.
[A digression. I would like to present photos of our wedding at this juncture in today’s story, but I have no photographs of the wedding in my possession — when we divided up our belongings in the early 1980s, Cathy took possession of the wedding photos, more to please her mother than for any other reason … my children tell me she still has the wedding album]
Nonetheless, Cathy and I were married, spending our wedding night at a fancy downtown Edmonton hotel, a gift from her mother (along with a brand new car she’d bought the two of us — recently, I’ve written about my daughter being a little too bourgeoise for my tastes; that well-practiced bougie aspect of how Megan presents herself to the world, and lives her life, comes directly from her mother & grandmother, the latter a Southam).
As you can see in the photo atop today’s column, I was pretty much smitten with Cathy (I think the only other person I know who looks at his wife as I do in the photo above is Seth Klein, when he looks at his wife, Christine Boyle). Once at the hotel, Cathy and I did what we usually did — we got stoned, which was a major feature of our life together during my university years in the early 1970s, along with a very active sex life.
Together, the two of us watched a Peter Sellers movie (although he had only a small part), The Wrong Box, on TV, snuggling with one another on the bed. About half an hour into watching the show, and nicely buzzed, Cathy retreated to the washroom, emerging in a blue, diaphanous and very short silk negligee — which, as you might imagine, did not remain a part of her dress for very long. We woke up the next morning very tired, indeed.
The marriage was a tempestuous one, not troubled exactly, but demanding at times, and overall for the first seven years, a great deal of fun, filled with love, betrayal, travel, an immense amount of sex (five times a day, every day for a decade, sometimes more), and on my part, a great deal of learning on how to be a productive and influential person in this world, as for all the years we were married, Cathy dressed me (“This is what you’re wearing today.”), edited my essays and other writing, and transformed me from an east side slum dwelling kid devoid of social skills into a presentable, and sometimes erudite young man. No Cathy, no Raymond Tomlin, at least not the Raymond Tomlin you have all come to know.

#BC Poli | BC Recovery Benefit Application Day | How to Apply

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process

The application for the BC Recovery Benefit that will be made available as a one-time direct deposit payment for eligible families, single parents or individuals opens today. You’ll want to take advantage of this benefit.
The key aspect to be aware of: You must apply to receive the benefit.
Now, the John Horgan could very easily have foregone what will turn out for many to be an arduous application process, if they’re even aware there is a benefit for which they are eligible, and could have held off payment until January 5th, 2021, when they very easily might have included the $500 for eligible individuals, and the $1000 for couples and single parents — as they did in April, when they combined the then Climate Action Credit of $330 — with the issuance of GST cheques to households across the province.
No fuss, no muss, no application process — just a tidy sum of money deposited in every eligible adult’s bank account on the first Tuesday of 2021 — not a bad way to start the new year, don’t you think?

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process

But in a blunder of immense proportion, not to mention a disingenuous way to commence Mr. Horgan’s first real mandate, our B.C. New Democratic Party provincial government has decided that not only will eligible British Columbians have to jump through the hoops of an online application process, eligibility for the BC Recovery Benefit is dependent on what you earned in the 2019 calendar year — before COVID-19 was on anyone’s radar, before businesses shut down due to the pandemic, causing the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs across our province — disallowing the full $500 recovery benefit to individuals who in 2019 earned more than $62,500 (with a sliding scale up to a cutoff of $87,500), with households with lower than a $125,000 combined income eligible for the full $1000 recovery benefit, decreasing that amount up to a cutoff point of $175,000.
If you lost you job or your business in 2020, and your income has plunged into the abyss in this very troubling year, you’ll be out of luck when it comes applying for the BC Recovery Benefit.

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process, covid-19, be grateful

What is that you’re saying? “Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth?”
For those who are unfamiliar with VanRamblings’ modus operandi, well … even with Hanukkah ending yesterday, we nonetheless just love to kvetch.
Okay, enough of this foofaraw, let’s get on with acquiring tax free moolah.

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process

First off, you going to have to click on this link to be taken to the British Columbia government’s BC Recovery Benefit application website.
Next, you’re going to have to get all your ducks in a row, and make sure you have the following information and documentation available in order to complete the application process …

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process

Note should be made: persons who are in receipt of the provincial Persons with Disabilities benefits are eligible to apply. The benefit will not be clawed back from existing benefits, as the recovery benefit is non-taxable.

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process, COVID-19

On Tuesday, December 8th, the BC government introduced legislation to secure funding for the BC Recovery Benefit, projected to help around 3.7 million British Columbians.

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process, covid-19, students can apply

Charlotte Aiden, a writer for The Ubyssey has written this story on student eligibility for the BC Recovery Benefit.

Students who are at least 19 years old and reside in British Columbia on December 18, filed a valid 2019 Canadian personal income tax return and have a social insurance, individual tax or temporary tax number are eligible to apply.

Unlike the Canada Emergency Student Benefit, international students are included in this benefit, given they meet the eligibility requirements.

You’ll need four things to apply on the government website: your net income from your 2019 tax return; your social insurance, individual tax or temporary tax number; your driver’s licence number if you have a BC driver’s licence (but this isn’t necessary); and your direct deposit information.

Unlike past benefits, this benefit will only be issued through direct deposit, so those who apply must have an account with a Canadian financial institution.

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process, COVID-19, telephone support

Toll free telephone support is available by phone starting Monday, December 21st, 2020.

  • Call 1-833-882-0020 (within North America);

  • Monday to Friday, 7:30 am to 5:00 pm, excluding statutory holidays;
  • You have until June 30, 2021 to apply.

The COVID-19 BC Recovery Benefit will cost as much as $1.7 billion, up from an estimate of $1.4 billion announced during the election.

#COVID19 | The Default Mask for Consumers to Buy | Safety First

The best mask for consumer to purchase is a high thread count cotton mask with a polypropylene filter

Wearing a mask is critical to reducing the spread of COVID-19, but rigorous tests conducted on behalf of CBC’s Marketplace found that while some work very well, others offer little protection from the particles that transmit the novel coronavirus. One type of mask even spread those particles to others.

Today on VanRamblings, for those who missed the November 13, 2020 episode of Marketplace, please find below the video of the results of the laboratory tests that were conducted on more than 20 different face masks on the market, revealing the safest, most effective mask for you to wear.

Marketplace put the masks through the rigorous National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) standard test, conducted at a lower air-flow regimen to reflect normal breathing. The test is usually reserved for N95s and personal protective equipment (PPE) intended for health-care workers. A standard NIOSH test measures filtration efficiency, meaning the particles the mask filters out as the wearer breathes in.

The valve mask is not recommended as a mask to protect you and others from COVID-19

One of the poorest performing masks, not only offering you minimal if any protection but serving to possibly infect others if you are an asymptomatic COVID-19 carrier is the valve mask pictured above — a mask, it should be noted in passing, VanRamblings purchased last spring, and (in retrospect now, stupidly) recommended to friends and acquaintances.

The valve mask is not recommended as a mask to protect you and others from COVID-19

In fact, of the more than 20 masks tested, only the valve mask was designated as a Do Not Use mask by scientists, as the mask risks spreading particles to others.
So, if the valve mask is the worst mask to purchase, what’s the best mask for you to buy? The answer: a 3-layer mask with an inner layer of melt-blown non-woven polypropylene — the only mask you should be wearing.

The best mask for you to wear is a three-layer cotton mask with a polypropylene filter

The best consumer mask Marketplace tested had an inner layer of melt-blown, non-woven polypropylene fabric and outer layers of high quality, 600 – 800 thread count cotton, with filtration efficiency rates as high as an N95. James Scott, a professor from the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health, who specialiazes in bioaerosols, ran the lab where Marketplace’s tests were run. Scott reported the combination of multiple materials contributed to the strong result for the masks pictured above.

“Even fairly low-efficiency masks are actually quite effective at catching much larger particles. But, it takes a really good mask to catch the small ones as well. And we know that the virus will travel not only on the big ones but the small ones as well,” said Scott.

You can find more information on all the masks tested by Marketplace in the video above, and on the CBC website, in this story.

After watching the COVID-19 face mask episode of Marketplace, VanRamblings purchased our melt-blown, non-woven polypropylene filtered cotton mask from the folks at The People’s Mask, for only $19.99, purchasing a 30-pack of filters (which we change weekly) for $29.99, plus applicable taxes and shipping, both of which products arrived within days.

When we’re out and about now — not a regular occurrence these days, except to go for a walk, a bike ride or shopping for food — we feel safer than previously, and feel good about not possibly infecting others.

Following the research conducted by CBC’s Marketplace, adding a third layer to cotton face masks is now recommended for preventing the spread of COVID-19. Non-woven polypropylene fabric is the material of choice for this third layer. This report out of McMaster University provides detail on what to do, and what not to do if you’re considering making the polypropylene mask at home. Amazon.ca sells a polypropylene filter mask, but delivery of the mask would not be due til late January or early February, so you may want to look elsewhere this particular filtered mask.

Edmonton-based The People’s Mask and Toronto’s Sydney’s both sell three-layer options. If you’re into fashion, there are designs by Amanda Lee Kew and Mayana Geneviere that have a pocket to easily pop a filter into.

The People’s Mask seems like the best, and least expensive, three layer polypropylene filter mask to buy. If you’re making face masks at home you can buy the filters through them, as well.

Music Sundays | Nine Chill Songs to Quieten Your COVID Week

A chill VanRamblings' Spotify PlaylistStarting on the top left: The Cinematic Orchestra, Brooke Fraser, Azure Ray, Love, Allison Moorer (in the middle), Andy Gibb, Bebel Gilberto, Crash Test Dummies, and Billie Eilish.

Today on Music Sunday, a chill 9-song Spotify playlist of some of my favourite laid-back songs, spanning the years from 1967 (that’d be the American group Love’s Alone Again Or, written by band member Bryan MacLean) right up until present day, with Billie Eilish’s, I Love You.
The various artists span the globe, from New Zealand singer-songwriter Brooke Fraser — with whom I became acquainted one autumn day in 1997 when walking into a neighbourhood consignment clothing store — where, of course, I purchased a great new sweater, the young woman behind the counter a recent Kiwi emigré, who was more than happy to share her love of Ms. Fraser’s music with me; Brazil’s Bebel Gilberto, singing a song originally recorded by her then 24-year-old step-mother Astrud, in 1965; plus a lo-fi jazz song from Britain’s The Cinematic Orchestra, featuring Québéçois singer-songwriter Patrick Watson on vocals; a song by Australia’s Andy Gibb; and music from Alison Moorer, raised in the southern U.S., which is where Azure Ray’s Orenda Fink and Maria Taylor hail from; and, from Canada, the Winnipeg-based Crash Test Dummies, Brad Roberts on vocals; and last but not least, the incomparable chanteuse, Billie Eilish.