Category Archives: Politics

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Patrick Condon | The Man With a Plan

UBC’s Patrick Condon — The Unlikely Revolutionary

Patrick Condon, Vancouver's revolutionary 2018 candidate for MayorPatrick Condon, the tousle-haired 2018 revolutionary candidate for Mayor of Vancouver

In today’s VanRamblings post, we set about to introduce you to University of British Columbia professor in Urban Design and Landscape Architectureokay, okay, let’s call him what he is: a City Planner, and a damn fine city planner at that, and a professor at UBC who has taught more than 80% of city planners currently employed across the Metro Vancouver region and who has played a key behind the scenes role in developing whatever livable aspects of life on the Lower Mainland that exists across our region today.
In today’s VanRamblings we refer to Mr. Condon — we’re going to call him “Patrick” from here on in, because that’s the way he’d want it, and that’s the way you should see him, as a friend, as a neighbour, and as one of us struggling to make ours a more livable city for all — as the Man With a Plan, and in the body of today’s post, as The Unlikely Revolutionary.
Why?
The answer is a simple one: never before in our city’s 132-year history have we had an accomplished city builder with a lifetime of experience in designing livable cities for all offer himself up as a candidate for Vancouver Mayor — that, at least in part, addresses the Man With a Plan headline.
Mr. Condon well elucidates his affordable housing and livable city plan in some great detail in the interview available at the top of today’s column.
You’ll want to listen closely to today’s interview with the affable, gregarious, and utterly charming and respectful of you and me, Mr. Condon — and if you don’t come away saying to yourself, “Patrick Condon is the guy I want to see as Vancouver’s next Mayor,” VanRamblings will be very surprised.

2018 Vancouver Mayoral aspirants Shauna Sylvester, Ian Campbell & Kennedy Stewart2018 Vancouver Mayoral aspirants Shauna Sylvester, Ian Campbell & Kennedy Stewart

All of which is to say that, as well, we continue to harbour immense respect for independent Mayoral candidate, Shauna Sylvester — Vancouver is long overdue for a woman Mayor — and that we kinda think the sun sorta rises & sets on Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell, one of the ‘great men’ we have met in our lifetime, accomplished and incredibly bright, and a man of integrity, wit and compassion — and a humble man of substance who means much good for our city; or, Kennedy Stewart — who’s worked as a federal NDP Member of Parliament for Burnaby-Douglas / Burnaby South since 2011, a Wolfville, Nova Scotia Maritime boy born and bred (Canadians don’t come any finer than those folks who’ve lived in the Maritimes), and an accomplished Parliamentarian with a democratic history of governance — and, the only candidate in the progressive coalition race with a successful electoral history, and first-hand experience in governance.
Patrick Condon’s entry into the Vancouver Mayoral race, though, has set the bar high for all the other 2018 Mayoral aspirants — there’s no bafflegab and no spin in the Patrick Condon zone, and when you’re a Mayoral candidate of vision and accomplished city building competence, how can you not have set the standard for what the electorate might expect in their next Mayor?

Patrick Condon, Vancouver's revolutionary 2018 candidate for Mayor

Still, we have referred to Patrick Condon as the unlikely revolutionary, and as such, we oughta explain ourselves — although Patrick does a pretty fine job of doing that all on his own, as you’ll hear in the interview above.
As Patrick told Straight editor Charlie Smith in a June 10th interview

“With the support of the federal and provincial governments, the city should build sufficient public housing on land made permanently public like they do in many European countries,” he declared. “Vienna is a model for what Vancouver could do. If we fail, this city will soon become nothing more than a parking place for cash and a pretty place to visit.”

So, what makes Patrick Condon’s Mayoral candidacy revolutionary?

1. A movement to 50% non-market housing: Patrick Condon says his goal is to increase the percentage of non-market housing in Vancouver, from 15% to 50% — as you’ll hear in the interview, a mix of co-op, co-housing and rental, with a social housing component for those requiring supports. Patrick explains how he’d go about that: building on city land — as he avers, there is currently $2.7 billion in Vancouver’s much-lauded Property Endowment Fund, and both the federal and provincial governments own hundreds of acres of Crown land in our city — Patrick Condon proposes to build non-market housing on those lands, on a leasehold basis, similar to what we see along south False Creek, as he explains today, in VanRamblings’ interview with the good Mr. Condon;

2. Neighbourhood consultation. With Patrick Condon as Mayor, you’d see him in your neighbourhood often, consulting with and listening to you, working together to build the city we need;

3. Negotiation of a fair collective agreement with City workers. And a collective agreement that would continue to set the standard for municipal collective agreements across British Columbia. A Patrick Condon candidacy would not come at the expense of city workers, nor any other worker employed by the city of Vancouver;

4. A radical re-think of Vancouver’s property tax system. A Patrick Condon Mayoralty, following an application to the province to make the required changes to the Vancouver Charter, would see a shift away from the current property tax system, such that first-time owners would pay much less, while properties assessed at $5 million or more would pay more, as would the multi-national corporate head offices located in Vancouver, with cuts to the small business tax — similar to the plan retired Vancouver City Councillor Tim Louis put in place when he was Finance Chair on Vancouver City Council, from 2002 – 2005.

There’s a great deal more that Patrick Condon has on mind that you’ll want to attend to when you listen for all of the detailed explanation in his unassailable plan, fiscal and otherwise, for creating a fairer, more just, and more inclusive city for all, a legacy for Patrick, and as he says a capstone for his career — and for all of us, the realization of the city we need.

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Green Party of Vancouver Candidates

On Wednesday evening, June 27th at the Heritage Hall in Vancouver, the Green Party of Vancouver selected its candidates for civic office: Vancouver City Council, Vancouver Park Board and Vancouver School Board.
As is usually the case in the realm of politics, as in life, the events of last evening did not proceed without a hitch. One VanRamblings correspondent called it a #shitshow — and so, in some respects, it was, but not out of malice, ill will or ill intent. Truth to tell, none of us are perfect.
Having attended all of the Vancouver municipal party nomination meetings to date, VanRamblings can report that what occurred at Heritage Hall Wednesday evening was not unique among Vancouver civic political party nomination meetings. Nomination meetings and hurt feelings go hand in hand.

The Green Party of Vancouver selected its 2018 candidates for civic office on June 27th

The evening’s events started out well, as may be seen in the video at the top of today’s column, with longtime Green Party activist (& VanRamblings friend) Jacquie Miller introducing the 2018 Vancouver Green Party nomination candidates, a more inspiring, heart-filled, competent, caring and ready for governing contingent of our city’s most civic-minded citizens than you could ever hope to find gathered at one place, at one time.
When the candidates had finished speaking — each candidate was given one minute to speak — was when a storm of discontent started brewing at the Green Party nomination meeting, a storm that turned into a full blown cyclone by meeting’s end. Seems that the affable Ms. Miller, her vetting committee cohort and the evening’s co-chair, Anthony Hughes, and two other Green Party vetting committee members — all four members on the Green Party Board of Directors — had made a decision to recommend a limited retinue of candidates to fill the spots that needed filling, leaving the remaining candidates feeling as if they had been left out in the cold.
There was such a chill in the air following the announcement of the “recommended” candidates, that as voting got underway to select the winning candidates — that despite the warm weather of the evening, parkas seemed like fitting nomination meeting wear for what was to follow.
VanRamblings was told that the decision to recommend candidates occurred as a consequence of a belief by the Board, and longtime members of the Green Party of Vancouver, that preference be given to those who had served the party well over a number of years. Ms. Miller, in announcing the retinue of recommended candidates was careful to point out that Green Party members could vote as they might wish, and select the candidates of their choice, but asked that due consideration be given to the recommended candidates. Of course, there was a flaw in that argument.

Francoise Raunet, a longtime activist with the Green Party of Vancouver, and British ColumbiaFrances Raunet, unsuccessful Vancouver Green Party candidate for City Council

VanRamblings has known, and known of, Francoise Raunet for many years.
We run across each other frequently, as we live in the same neighbourhood. When Ms. Raunet was working on her Masters degree in International Studies at the University of British Columbia, we ran into each other regularly as she was ferrying her children to her home on the University Endowment Lands. At the moment, Ms. Raunet teaches at General Gordon School, the school where VanRamblings’ two grandsons attend.
In 2013, Ms. Raunet ran as a Green candidate in Vancouver-Point Grey (against VanRamblings’, and British Columbia’s, most beloved David Eby, currently our province’s highly regarded Minister of Justice and Attorney General). VanRamblings has always held Ms. Raunet — a Green Party stalwart if there ever was one — in the highest personal regard. Yet Ms. Raunet was not one of the recommended candidates. Strange that.
Francoise told VanRamblings that, having lost out on a Green Party nomination for Vancouver City Council (in a flawed process unbecoming of a party that prides itself on openness and transparency) that she intends to run as an independent candidate in the coming Vancouver civic election, where she knows she will not win. Clearly, Francoise is an accomplished woman of intellect and acumen and would make for a great City Council candidate — still, we think it a terrible mistake that she would seek to run against a party she loves and has dedicated her life to, even if she feels, quite rightly, that the party’s executive council let her down.

Denise Brennan was unsuccessful in securing a Green Party of Vancouver City Council nomination

While Ms. Raunet’s perturbation at the course of the events of the evening and her unsuccessful attempt to secure a Green Party of Vancouver City Council nomination was muted, the same could not be said of Denise Brennan, the Executive Director of Creative Coworkers, a non-profit community space in Vancouver’s Railtown neighbourhood.
VanRamblings moved in Ms.Brennan’s direction when we witnessed how infuriated she seemed to be. Ms. Brennan turned to VanRamblings — if looks could kill, you would not be reading this column at present.
Ms. Brennan’s intent — both in publicly addressing her concerns on the flawed process for selecting candidates, the lack of diversity among the candidates (“And here I thought the Green Party was committed to diversity. Four women civic election candidates have been selected by the party, and seven men. So much for diversity, so much for fairness, so much for fair play, so much for progressive Green values, huh? I hope you’re all proud of yourselves.”) — would seem to be to hurt the party. Suffice to say, we would not wish to run across Ms. Brennan in a dark alley late at night.
Denise Brennan is likely to be trouble with a capital “T” for the Green Party of Vancouver this summer, to which we say, entitlement much?
In VanRamblings estimation, the process for selecting the Green Party of Vancouver’s civic election candidates was flawed — but as we pointed out at the nomination meeting, it was not a fatally flawed process. Green Party members voted, party members could vote as they wished, and based on the comments we heard from dozens of party members about the “recommendation process“, some members went out of their way not to vote for the recommended candidates. Still, all but one of the recommended candidates proved successful in securing a nomination.
VanRamblings has been around politics for more than 50 years, and what we’ve discovered is that, like life, politics just ain’t fair.
Are you a budding politician, and want to secure a nomination: put in the work. In politics, that’s called organizing. Successful Green Party School Board candidate Nicholas Chernen organized, acute enough in his bid to secure a nomination that he approached Green Party City Council candidates Pete Fry and Michael Wiebe, impressed the heck out of them, who ended up asking their legion of supporters to support Mr. Chernen, that he would prove to be a great candidate for the Green Party, and would be someone Green members might be duly proud.
Here’s the bottom line: the Green Party of Vancouver selected first-rate, supportable candidates on Wednesday evening.

The Green Party of Vancouver 2018 candidates for civic office

VanRamblings will predict now that the competent and humbled-by-the-opportunity-to serve candidates who were selected will contribute to what is destined to be a breakout municipal election for the party, who look to elect all four candidates to City Council (there’s still a negotiation going on with the Vancouver & District Labour Council that could see that number reduced to three), and do well on both school and park board.
OneCity Vancouver candidate for City Council Ben Bolliger — who ran one of the most masterful nomination campaigns we’ve ever witnessed — was unsuccessful in securing a nomination, but you’re going to find that there’ll be no harder working and more dedicated worker on the campaign trail for all of the One City candidates for civic office than Ben Bolliger. And that’s how it should be. The same will be true for the unsuccessful nomination candidates for each of the other civic parties — and that’s how it should be.
There are many ways to serve your community other than elected office.
There are 33 advisory committees and agencies at City Hall — ranging from the library board, the engaged city task force, the all-powerful Board of Variance, and the seniors advisory, active transportation, public arts, civic asset renaming, and heritage, planning, and so many other committees and agencies of city governance where you can make a difference. There’s just ain’t no time to kvetch, when there’s so much that needs doing.
VanRamblings hopes that members on the Green Party Board of Directors, and the successful candidates and Green Party elected officials reach out to Ms. Raunet, Ms. Brennan, Mash Salehomoum and each of the disgruntled candidates who were not selected on Wednesday evening, to bring them back into the fold, to let them know how much they are valued, and the opportunities that lie ahead for them in the arena of civic governance.
Politics is not about personal ambition, either — at least it shouldn’t be.
Politics must continue to be about what has always been true: one enters political life to be a difference maker — and that political involvement includes volunteering, door-knocking, fundraising, hosting coffee klatches, donating monies, and even coming forward as a nomination candidate for civic office — because one desires, needs to serve the greater good.

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Shauna Sylvester | Mayoral Candidate

Interview with educator & social activist Shauna Sylvester, 2018 Vancouver Mayoral Candidate

As respected civic affairs reporter Frances Bula wrote in her Globe & Mail profile of educator & social activist, the accomplished Shauna Sylvester …

A woman best known for fostering public dialogue and advocating for sustainable cities is announcing her bid to become mayor of Vancouver — without the backing of any civic party. Shauna Sylvester is the first candidate from the centre-left of the political spectrum to formally declare her candidacy in one of the most wide-open campaigns Vancouver has ever seen. Mayor Gregor Robertson and several seasoned councillors have chosen not to run again — just as the city’s seemingly intractable housing crisis has become the No. 1 issue. Ms. Sylvester said she believes her collaborative style is what’s needed as the city grapples with its severe housing crisis, as well as its transition to a different kind of economy — less resource-based, more diverse and tech-oriented.

Ms. Sylvester is committed to running her race through until voting day, Saturday, October 20th, and believes she is the change-maker Vancouver needs in 2018 to create a more socially just city that serves the interests of all citizens. Shauna will meet with the Vancouver & District Labour Council next month to seek their endorsement as Vancouver’s next Mayor.

SFU's Shauna Sylvester, Executive Director of The Centre for Dialogue, and 2018 Vancouver Mayoral Candidate

Commitments Shauna Sylvester has made in her Mayoral campaign …

  • Appropriate housing that is affordable for service workers as well as professionals;

  • Public and private transit into and within the City;
  • Living wage campaigns;
  • Affordable day care;
  • Quality public education and retraining programmes;
  • Vibrant arts and culture;
  • Diverse food and entertainment offerings;
  • Secure, affordable housing that nurtures the social connections and sense of belonging, with the city leveraging city assets to help facilitate non-market solutions such as housing co-ops and co-housing, non-profits and community land trusts.

Sign up to support Shauna Sylvester’s Mayoralty campaign by clicking here.

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Board of Education | Good Governance

On Monday evening, June 25th 2018, the Board of Education Trustees at the Vancouver School Board (VSB) wrestled with a full agenda covering a range of items, including …

  • The formation of a new school naming and existing school renaming committee, in response to a demand by the public to have school names reflect community heritage, and the contributions of not just white men (as is the case at present) but the diversity of those residents of Vancouver who either now call Vancouver home, or did in our past;

  • Establishing live streaming video of Vancouver School Board meetings, the service to start at the beginning of the new school year;
  • Banning plastic disposable cups in favour of ceramic cups or glasses in school cafeterias;
  • Approving a five-year capital plan for the Vancouver school district;
  • Making changes to the electoral ballot in the upcoming civic election, so names will occur at random, rather than in alphabetical order.

No item on Monday night’s Vancouver School Board agenda was more contentious than the decision that the Board would make as to whether the Board would sell the subsurface of a West End school property to the BC Hydro Crown Corporation — in order that BC Hydro might construct an underground substation — in exchange for BC Hydro building two new, state-of-art elementary schools in the burgeoning West End neighbourhood.

Lord Roberts Elementary School Annex in Vancouver's West EndLord Roberts Elementary School Annex | Vancouver’s West End neighbourhood

The controversy? Here’s what former VSB Chair Patti Bacchus wrote in a May 10th story in The Georgia Straight, titled, The VSB should pull the plug on B.C. Hydro’s school substation plan

(If the Vancouver School Board approves the BC Hydro plan) the West End loses a much-loved small school and several trees beside a lovely, peaceful park that’s one of the few public green spaces in their densely populated community. They get five or more years of major construction work and all the disruption, dirt, and noise that brings. They get left with a buried electrical substation they worry will harm their and their children’s health, or maybe catch fire or blow up, as substations have been known to do. They may or may not get a school built on the site that would open in 2030 or later.

Meanwhile, those trustees who were in favour of the proposal pointed out to their colleagues that an agreement with BC Hydro would provide funding that would expedite the construction of a new Coal Harbour school, create a new playing field at Lord Roberts Annex, and provide space for a full-sized elementary school at the site after the work on the substation is completed.

Vancouver School Board meeting, June 25 2018 | Photo credit, Patti BacchusVancouver School Board meeting, June 25 2018 | Photo credit, Patti Bacchus

At Monday evening’s Board of Education meeting, as instructed by Board Chair Janet Fraser that the discussion of the contentious BC Hydro proposal must remain respectful, the eight Board of Education trustees who were present discussed the efficacy of the BC Hydro proposal: a precedent-setting sale of school property to a corporation vs the realization of two new elementary schools in the burgeoning West End neighbourhood.
In a story published in The Georgia Straight this morning, The Straight’s editor-in-chief Charlie Smith quotes School Board Chairperson Janet Fraser on the controversial decision taken at the Board last night …

“We thank our stakeholders and the West End community for their interest and input on this proposal and I also thank our Board of Trustees for their due diligence in reviewing the proposal materials and asking many questions,” Fraser said in a news release. “Having considered all relevant factors the Board has now voted to move forward with this project. The VSB will continue to consult and work with our stakeholders and the West End community as the timeline for this project unfolds.”

As Charlie Smith also goes on to write, “The two NPA trustees, Lisa Dominato and Fraser Ballantyne, both strongly endorsed the decision,” with Vancouver Non-Partisan Association trustee Dominato quoted from a press release, stating …

“There is a critical need for another school in the West End and this agreement will enable us to move ahead with this project sooner so we can meet the educational needs of current and future families,” Dominato said in a party news release. “The minister of education has been clear that the province does not intend to fund this project any time soon.”

Ms. Dominato confirmed in last week’s Planning and Facilities Committee meeting on this matter that the City of Vancouver is committed to the Coal Harbour development as part of the upcoming capital plan, which will include the new school, day care, and social housing.
The new Coal Harbour K – 7 elementary school is set to open in 2023 as part of this development, and will house the Lord Roberts Annex students until a new school is constructed on the Annex site, the new K – 7 Lord Roberts school projected to open in the fall of 2028.
In statement on Facebook titled, Why I Voted No on the Substation Proposal, OneCity Vancouver School Board trustee Carrie Bercic writes …

Schools and parks are there for the community. They are community assets and should be held in trust for all future generations. We shouldn’t be selling any of our assets to corporations (no matter what type of corporation) whether in whole or in part. This is especially the case because we are considering this proposal in order to have needed schools built — schools that should always be paid for by the provincial government.

The community impacts from this project, are too great. While we as trustees are responsible for school board decisions, this decision extends beyond just school board. The green space at Nelson Park is precious. It is something to be preserved. The transmission lines that would go through the park have a significant perception of being unsafe. This means that it will deeply impact the use and enjoyment of this park for the entire West End. It is important to realize that this park is the back yard and playground for hundreds of children and pets.

All of the above said, written and recorded, contention and controversy notwithstanding, if you’ve ever wondered what our elected officials are up to — no matter where you live — Monday evening’s Vancouver School Board discussion of the BC Hydro proposal offered a master class in respectful, informed, passionate and reasoned democratic engagement, as fine an example on how thoughtful decision-making takes place in the public realm as you’ll ever witness. Please, do yourself a favour: watch the video above.
We live in a cynical and divisive age, an age of anomie and alienation, of a seemingly never-ending flood of rage. But you know — it doesn’t have to be that way. Although the Board of Education trustees are off for their annual summer break, do yourself another favour when the Board returns in September. Attend a Vancouver School Board meeting, impress yourself, hearten yourself, and come to realize that things are not one one-hundreth as bad as you think they are, that indeed there are good and great people of conscience who listen to you, and make decisions on your behalf — because the decision that took place on Monday night, as retiring Board of Education trustee Joy Alexander so eloquently put it, “reflects the will of the people, the decision we will take tonight beneficial to those who elected each one of us to office in the hope that the decisions we might make would reflect their best expressed wishes. And so we must, and so we will.”