Category Archives: Politics

#BC Poli | BC Recovery Benefit Application Day | How to Apply

December 18, 2020BC Politics, News, PoliticsRaymond Tomlin

BC Recovery Benefit eligibility, the application process

The application for the BC Recovery Benefit that will be made available as a one-time direct deposit payment for eligible families, single parents or individuals opens today. You’ll want to take advantage of this benefit.
The key aspect to be aware of: You must apply to receive the benefit.
Now, the John Horgan could very easily have foregone what will turn out for many to be an arduous application process, if they’re even aware there is a benefit for which they are eligible, and could have held off payment until January 5th, 2021, when they very easily might have included the $500 for eligible individuals, and the $1000 for couples and single parents — as they did in April, when they combined the then Climate Action Credit of $330 — with the issuance of GST cheques to households across the province.
No fuss, no muss, no application process — just a tidy sum of money deposited in every eligible adult’s bank account on the first Tuesday of 2021 — not a bad way to start the new year, don’t you think?

But in a blunder of immense proportion, not to mention a disingenuous way to commence Mr. Horgan’s first real mandate, our B.C. New Democratic Party provincial government has decided that not only will eligible British Columbians have to jump through the hoops of an online application process, eligibility for the BC Recovery Benefit is dependent on what you earned in the 2019 calendar year — before COVID-19 was on anyone’s radar, before businesses shut down due to the pandemic, causing the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs across our province — disallowing the full $500 recovery benefit to individuals who in 2019 earned more than $62,500 (with a sliding scale up to a cutoff of $87,500), with households with lower than a $125,000 combined income eligible for the full $1000 recovery benefit, decreasing that amount up to a cutoff point of $175,000.
If you lost you job or your business in 2020, and your income has plunged into the abyss in this very troubling year, you’ll be out of luck when it comes applying for the BC Recovery Benefit.

What is that you’re saying? “Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth?”
For those who are unfamiliar with VanRamblings’ modus operandi, well … even with Hanukkah ending yesterday, we nonetheless just love to kvetch.
Okay, enough of this foofaraw, let’s get on with acquiring tax free moolah.

First off, you going to have to click on this link to be taken to the British Columbia government’s BC Recovery Benefit application website.
Next, you’re going to have to get all your ducks in a row, and make sure you have the following information and documentation available in order to complete the application process …

Note should be made: persons who are in receipt of the provincial Persons with Disabilities benefits are eligible to apply. The benefit will not be clawed back from existing benefits, as the recovery benefit is non-taxable.

On Tuesday, December 8th, the BC government introduced legislation to secure funding for the BC Recovery Benefit, projected to help around 3.7 million British Columbians.

Charlotte Aiden, a writer for The Ubyssey has written this story on student eligibility for the BC Recovery Benefit.

Students who are at least 19 years old and reside in British Columbia on December 18, filed a valid 2019 Canadian personal income tax return and have a social insurance, individual tax or temporary tax number are eligible to apply.

Unlike the Canada Emergency Student Benefit, international students are included in this benefit, given they meet the eligibility requirements.

You’ll need four things to apply on the government website: your net income from your 2019 tax return; your social insurance, individual tax or temporary tax number; your driver’s licence number if you have a BC driver’s licence (but this isn’t necessary); and your direct deposit information.

Unlike past benefits, this benefit will only be issued through direct deposit, so those who apply must have an account with a Canadian financial institution.

Toll free telephone support is available by phone starting Monday, December 21st, 2020.

Call 1-833-882-0020 (within North America);
Monday to Friday, 7:30 am to 5:00 pm, excluding statutory holidays;
You have until June 30, 2021 to apply.

The COVID-19 BC Recovery Benefit will cost as much as $1.7 billion, up from an estimate of $1.4 billion announced during the election.

#COVID19 | As The Pandemic Wends Its Glorious Way to A Close

December 8, 2020BC Politics, Canada, Food & Health, News, Politics, VancouverRaymond Tomlin

Hope for an expeditious end to our current pandemic circumstance appears to be relatively close, with vaccines from at least four — and more probably, six — companies appear well on their way to receiving approval in the next short while, with the two-injection Pfizer vaccine appearing set for approval by Health Canada as early as this Thursday, December 10th, with Moderna, AstraZenica and Johnson & Johnson not far behind in the pipeline. Update: Health Canada approved the Pfizer/BioNTech on December 9th.

A number of announcements have been made in recent days involving the roll-out of the vaccines that will, eventually, keep us all safe …

On November 27th, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the appointment of former NATO commander Maj.-Gen. Dany Fortin to lead the national vaccine distribution effort, with a target of immunizing half of all Canadians — that’s 19 million of us — or more, by September, 2021;

Just yesterday, the Prime Minister told Canadians that Canada has secured an agreement to receive its first batch of Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine before the end of the year — up to 249,000 doses. Pending Health Canada approval, “Canadians will be getting vaccinated starting next week,” Trudeau said at a news conference in Ottawa. Shipments will continue to arrive in 2021; the second batch will be reserved for the same people vaccinated in the first batch — which is to say, the elderly in long term care facilities across Canada. “We’re facing the largest immunization in the history of our country,” Trudeau said.

Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) this past Friday released its final directive addressing the prioritization of who should receive the vaccines first, and which groups would be next, right through until the late spring. By the end of March, NACI scientists said they expect 3 million Canadians will have been vaccinated with one of the three (soon to be four, or more) approved COVID-19 vaccines, that number doubling by late June, and doubling yet again by early to mid-autumn of 2021.

The initial batch of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines will roll out to 249,000, or more, Canadians

NACI scientists advise the roll-out of vaccines will occur, as follows …

(a) Long-term care and assisted living facility residents, as well as residents in retirement homes and chronic care hospitals, who face “severe outcomes” and a much greater chance of dying from the disease than the population as a whole;
(b) NACI scientists said the next priority group would be “adults 80 years of age and older;”
Number of Canadians, by province, expected to receive the initial batch of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in the early part of 2021, beginning in January.

(c) NACI scientists expressed concern about Indigenous adults living in communities “where infection can have disproportionate consequences, such as those living in remote or isolated areas.” Indigenous persons will be the third group of Canadians to be vaccinated;
(d) Adults aged 75 – 79 would be next to receive vaccinations, followed by adults aged 70 – 74 years of age.

These four groups — long-term care residents and staff, the elderly, front line health care workers and some Indigenous adults — are expected to consume all of the six million doses (the Pfizer vaccine requires two doses) to be delivered in the first three months of 2021.

In the second phase of the vaccine roll-out, which would begin in April 2021, as more supply comes online, other essential workers will have access. The NACI advisory committee said first responders — such as police officers, firefighters and health care workers not included in the initial rollout — would be next in line, followed by residents and staff in other “congregate settings” — such as migrant workers, prisoners in correctional facilities and people in homeless shelters.
At the end of the day, though, it is the provincial Premiers, their Health Ministers and Public Health Officers who will determine prioritization of vaccine roll-out in their jurisdictions. By late summer / early autumn, Prime Minister Trudeau has said he expects half of all Canadians would be vaccinated — that’s 19 million Canadians.
The vaccine roll-out will continue through the end of 2021, and beyond.

#ParkBoard | The Politics Never End Within Our Civic Bodies

December 4, 2020BC Politics, Park Board, Politics, VancouverRaymond Tomlin

John Coupar, Non Partisan Association Park Board Commissioner | Standing in opposition to an anti-democratic motion coming to the Vancouver Park Board | Photo: Dan Toulgoet

In civic governance as practiced within the City of Vancouver, politics — you know, the kind of politics that have our electeds sniping at, belittling, attempting to one up, disliking verging on hatred, while actively engaged in disrespecting one another — remains the order of the day, less so at Vancouver School Board, but ever present at Council (or, now, during their safe socially distanced Webex online meetings), and around the Park Board table nestled within the Vancouver Park Board offices, or is now the case during our pandemic times, online using the city’s Webex online platform.
In the new year, VanRamblings will dedicate the early months of the year to writing about Vancouver civic governance (suffice to say, we’re not happy), and had intended to enjoy the season and leave for another day what will in all likelihood be an evisceration (such a nasty word) of governance in the city of Vancouver, as it is currently practiced, until the following arose …

Vancouver Park Board staff will bring the above recommendation to the Park Board table next Monday, December 7th, first in an in-camera online meeting not available to the public, and then at 6:30pm when the final online meeting of Park Board Commissioners — before the holiday break — will take place. The next Park Board meeting is set for January 18th, 2021.
According to a 31-page Vancouver Park Board staff report [PDF] …

The Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation Procedure By-law (Park Board Procedure By-law) guides how the business of the Park Board Commissioners is handled and applies to all meetings of the Board and its committees. While the current by-law underwent a comprehensive review in 2018 before being enacted by the Board January 2019, it is best practice to undertake regular administrative reviews to ensure procedures remain relevant.

The revisions outlined in this report, and attached as Appendix A, are proposed to reflect current practices, address gaps, and clarify procedures that may have led to some ambiguity or confusion. Additionally, recommendations have been included to provide Commissioners options to follow-up on the “Future Considerations noted in the last by-law update report regarding electronic and special meetings.

The net impact of the recommendation, when it becomes a motion before the Board this next Monday, as it surely will, would be to deny a minority contingent of duly elected Park Board members to call a Special Meeting of the Board to seek public input on issues of concern to the general populace.
In these parts, we call that bullying, rule of the majority, arrogant decision-making by elected officials, and - let’s face it - downright anti-democratic.

Vancouver Park Board Commissioners, l-r: Tricia Barker, John Coupar (NPA); Gwen Giesbrecht, John Irwin (COPE); Stuart Mackinnon, Camil Dumont, Dave Demers (Greens)

Apparently, the genesis for the staff recommendation arises from a Special Meeting of the Board that two Commissioners, John Coupar and Tricia Barker, called this past summer to discuss transportation issues within Stanley Park, with which members of the public had expressed concern.
As a general rule — be it at Council, School Board or Park Board — senior staff are reluctant, at best, to meet with the public to discuss issues of public concern, cuz it’s messy and democratic, and diminishes their power as the professionals who, in actuality, “run” city governance — not to mention which, these time consuming meetings can go on for days, and it takes them away from the familial comfort of their homey and cozy offices.
Park Board staff were none-too-pleased with the calling of the June 18, 2020 Special Meeting — thus, their recommendation to Commissioners. And, if truth be told, neither were COPE Commissioners Gwen Giesbrecht — who viscerally dislikes the rather lovable John Coupar — and John Irwin, and Green Party of Vancouver Park Board Commissioners, current Chairperson, Camil Dumont (also not much of a fan of his NPA Park Board colleagues, ditto his fellow Greens) — Dave Demers & Stuart Mackinnon.
Yes, it’s civic governance as a particularly bad high school experience.

Now, should the staff “recommendation” be accepted by a majority of the Board at this upcoming final 2020 meeting of Park Board, here’s what the net effect the passage of the motion would mean for governance at the Board, as well as the process to realize the intention of Park Board staff …

1. Going forward only the Park Board Chairperson, or a majority of Board members could call for a Special Meeting of the Board — a derivation of Board practice dating back to its inception more than a century ago;

2. Although there is a provision in the by-law and Park Board governance provisions that would allow a minority contingent of Park Board Commissioners to call a Special Meeting, to address urgent issues of concern to the public, such a motion could (and probably would) be tabled by the majority of the Board Commissioners, effectively making moot the urgent concern provisions of Park Board governance;

3. Assuming the “motion” passes, it would then be forwarded to Vancouver City Council for passage before Council (where such provisions as staff are recommending at Park Board are already in place). How would Council likely respond to the entreaty of Park Board to make application to the provincial government for a change to the Vancouver Charter to accommodate the expressed wishes of the current Park Board? VanRamblings believes the answer would be, contentiously not well;

4. For the sake of argument, let’s say Council says, “Okay you buckos at Park Board, we’ll grant you your Christmas wish, and post your recommended Charter change to our mistresses and masters in Victoria.” La-di-dah. How would British Columbia’s new Minister Responsible for Municipal Affairs, former Tofino Mayor, Josie Osborne, receive the entreaty of Council and Park Board for a change to the Vancouver Charter?

Uuummmm, not well?

One would think that our currently elected Park Board Commissioners would have many better things to do with their time than to seek to diminish democratic governance around the Park Board table, and diminish input from the public into decision-making by our elected Commissioners.
Apparently not.

Vancouver Park Board Commissioner John Coupar on his opposition to a motion to be presented at Park Board on December 7 2020 that would limit public input into decision-making at the Park Board table, and prevent minority members of the Board from calling for a Special Meeting of the Board when issues of public concern arise.

Note should be made that Park Board Chair Dumont determines what items find their way onto the Park Board agenda — as it happens, the Park Board Chair is all powerful. Nothing gets onto the agenda if he doesn’t want it to. So, apparently, Mr. Dumont is possessed of a strong desire to see this staff recommendation become a motion at the Park Board table, a motion he would vigorously support and urge his fellow Commissioners to support.

‘Ceptin one thing: at some point, it’s possible that Mr. Dumont and Mr. Demers would comprise a minority contingent of Green Party of Vancouver Park Board Commissioners on the elected Vancouver Park Board, the values of the remaining Park Board Commissioners in diametric opposition to that for which Mr. Dumont and Mr. Demers steadfastly stand.
Note to Park Board Chairperson Camil Dumont, and his fellow COPE and Green Party of Vancouver Park Board Commissioners: turn the the staff governance report into a motion of Park Board at next Monday’s meeting, and risk that at some point down the road, your very own power as a duly elected Park Board Commissioner will be much diminished.
A risky venture for our elected Park Board Commissioners, anti-democratic in design and intention, and very much contrary to the public interest.

#USElection2020 | Georgia Run-Off | Stupid Is As Stupid Does

November 30, 2020PoliticsRaymond Tomlin

Capitol Building, seat of United States Congress, 1827, Washington DC, District of Columbia, United States of America, 19th century.

Over the weekend, frustrated supporters of President Donald Trump in Georgia challenged Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel on why they should even vote in the upcoming Senate runoffs if “rigged” elections are “already decided.”

Here is video from one of the exchanges. A supporter asks why the RNC is not looking into the allegations with the voting machines. McDaniel stated flatly there is no evidence of that.
Then someone asks why they should vote in this election when it’s “already decided”. pic.twitter.com/gzDXB7OfEK

— Ryan Nobles (@ryanobles) November 28, 2020

Ms. McDaniel’s Saturday campaign stop in Marietta, Georgia, appeared to backfire as Trump supporters who have adopted the president’s conspiratorial accusations about “voter fraud” asked why their vote even matters. The electoral scene in Georgia doesn’t bode well for Republicans as they look to hang onto a razor thin U.S. Senate majority that hinges on prevailing in two January 5th 2021 run-off elections for the U.S. Senate.

Both incumbent Georgia Republican senators, David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, face stiff, well-financed challenges from Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Reverend Raphael Warnock, respectively.

One baffled Trump supporter at the event asked how Republicans turned out in such “crazy numbers,” but somehow now President-elect Joseph R. Biden still defeated “our” president. Not fair, he said, claiming “machines are switching the votes,” a baseless accusation lifted directly from Trump.

The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 Election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud – including dead people voting, Poll Watchers not allowed into polling locations, “glitches” in the voting machines which changed…

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 18, 2020

The nexus of social media, conspiracy theories, President Donald Trump’s rampant paranoia, the rise of NewsMax and OANN as “in the bag” Trump supporting American networks that daily are gaining millions of new right-of-centre viewers, coupled with Trump’s loss to the incoming Democratic President have combined to create a rapidly changing dynamic in the Georgia U.S. Senate run-off elections among Trumpian conservative voters.

From L-R. Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler and Democratic challenger Rev. Raphael Warnock, Republican Sen. David Perdue and Democratic challenger Jon Ossoff.

If Democratic candidates Jon Ossoff and Reverend Raphael Warnock win both runoff elections, their party would then capture control over the U.S. Senate with a 50-50 tie, with Democratic Vice President-Elect Kamala Harris casting the deciding vote on contentious issues before the Senate.

Ever since the U.S. presidential election on November 3rd, Trump-supporting conservative Republicans have — without evidence — claimed the election in Georgia was stolen from President Donald Trump.
Now what appears to be an ever increasingly large group of Trump cultists are actively encouraging Georgia Republican voters to boycott their state’s two U.S. Senate run-off elections, calling for that boycott in posts on the new and popular right-wing Facebook and Twitter alternative app, Parler.
Parler posts using the #BoycottGArunoffs hashtag show conservative Republicans distrust of and disgust with Georgia’s voting system, but without evidence for their position, fuelled by unsubstantiated claims from President Trump’s campaign of widespread voter fraud in Georgia, and across the United States. Not only are Parler adherents calling for a voter boycott of the run-off elections in Georgia, chatter on the social media app refers to both Georgia Republican Senate candidates as “died-in-the-wool” members of the “deep state, and an even much worse choices than their Democratic challengers. Why vote in a system that is broken?”

So, let’s see if we’ve got this straight: Trumpian cultists have launched a successful campaign — on Parler, on NewsMax, on OAAN — calling for a boycott of the January 5 2021 Georgia run-off election, the latest polls showing 450,000 Georgia GOP voters intend to boycott the run-off election.

Meanwhile, recent Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, and her Fair Fight team have organized millions of Georgia voters into a militant voting bloc within the state, as well as raising tens of millions of dollars in campaign funds heading into the all important January 5 2021 Georgia run-off election — that should she and her team succeed in their endeavour and elect both Jon Ossoff and Reverend Raphael Warnock would mean that the Democratic party would have full control of the reins of power, in the White House and both houses of the United States Congress.

Almost enough to make a grown woman or man cry.
Though the number of people calling for a boycott may be growing, with control of the Senate up for grabs and the potential for Senator David Perdue’s race against Jon Ossoff and Senator Kelly Loeffler’s race against Rev. Raphael Warnock remains very close according to the latest polling. Both incumbent Republicans candidates would do well to monitor the boycott calls if they intend to come out as victors on Tuesday evening, January 5 2021 — already there are no-mask Trump rallies being planned.