Category Archives: Decision Canada

Decision Canada: Election Called Off For Lack of Interest


ELECTION-2004




DAY12-25-DAYS-REMAINING


Maybe it’s that we’re nearing the end of the second full week of the election campaign. Maybe it’s that there’s been no defining moment thus far in the campaign. Maybe it’s that it’s been a dull campaign. Maybe it’s that Canadians didn’t really want a federal election, certainly not one at the beginning of summer.
Whatever the case, here we are at the end of Day 12 of the campaign, and all that one can reasonably do is y-y-y-a-a-a-w-w-w-n-n-n. Thus far, Decision 2004 has been unremittingly dull and unengaging.
Nonetheless, VanRamblings will trudge on, to bring you the ‘important’ political events of the day. Try to stay awake.
Yesterday’s CPAC-SES poll must have been a blip on the political radar on the way to a Conservative minority government (n-n-n-o-o-o-o, say it ain’t so). Today’s CPAC-SES results point to a stunning 4% rise in the polls for the damnable Conservative party, even while the Liberals (still current front-runners) drop six percentage points, since campaign’s outset.
VanRamblings is beginning to see why the CBC has opted not to run polling results on the people’s network. They’re too dispiriting.
PoliticsWatch Vote Selector
Don’t know who to vote for?
Answer the questions posed at PoliticsWatch.com, and PoliticsWatch will help you to determine which candidate — and his or her political party — most closely matches your political views. Surprise, surprise that Jack Layton and the NDP matched my own personal selections at 100%.
The Stench of Desperation – Get A Grip, Mr. Martin
In a timely article published on page A20 of today’s Globe and Mail, Canada’s national paper poses the questions, “(If) Paul Martin is among the best-qualified prime-ministerial candidates in Canadian history … why is he struggling so? Why, with a month to go till election day, does the stench of desperation permeate the Liberal campaign?”
Kevin Brennan, at Tilting at Windmills, thinks he knows the answer …

If (the Liberals) want to win, they need to start acting like they’re proud of their record. They need to realize that running against the Conservatives isn’t enough — they have to actually demonstrate that they have a vision of their own. If they don’t believe in their own record, why should we? If they don’t believe that they ought to run the country, why should we?
The thing is, most Canadians still want a Liberal government. They just don’t trust the Liberals to run it. I still think events will conspire to rescue Martin this time around. But unless he learns how to act like a leader, he won’t win a second term.

Will events conspire to re-elect the Liberals? We’ll know — in 25 days.
Conservative Party Supporter Punches Questioner


PUNCH


Bob Smyth of the group Canadians for
Equal Marriage
is punched by a
Conservative Party supporter at a rally
for Stephen Harper, in Guelph Ontario.

You wonder if we’re going to see more of this kind of thing over the course of the next three weeks? You wonder if this picture portends the future?
The first thing that came to mind when I heard about the altercation — graphically depicted to your right — was, “What is this? Nazi Germany? Is there no room for political dissent in the world of Stephen Harper? When valid questions are posed to the individual who might be the next leader of the country, when the questions do not find favour with the potential leader’s supporters, is the only response available to beat down the questioner?”
These are real questions — posed honestly, and not meant to cause offence, or come across as sounding inflammatory.
It’s a sad and regrettable day in Canadian politics when the supporters of a political candidate resort to violence. Why hasn’t Stephen Harper responded to this disturbing incident, and denounced the tactics of intimidation employed by an aggressive supporter of the Conservative Party?
Martin Unveils Platform, Seeks Campaign Shift
As pointed out by the Globe and Mail, “Paul Martin tried to push the focus of an attack-filled election campaign back toward policy Thursday, unveiling a left-leaning platform that focuses on social program spending.”
Watch this CBC video (RealPlayer required) for more information on the Thursday announcement of Liberal Party platform, Moving Canada Forward.
Abortion: A Conservative Party Insult To Women
“If, for a nanosecond, I considered voting for the ‘new’ Conservative Party, that moment has definitely passed,” fumed Dale Robinette, a friend of Globe and Mail columnist Margaret Wente, on the Globe’s Letters to the Editor page yesterday.
“It’s my body!” shrieked her friend Cathy. “And I don’t need anybody else to tell me what to do with it!”
“So much for the urban Ontario female vote”, writes Wente. “Mr. Harper has been trying to persuade this important demographic his party is not made up of troglodytes. He just lost.”
Watch this CTV video to hear Stephen Harper’s coy reply to the question of Conservative support for changes in current abortion legislation.
Sue Bailey, at the Toronto Star, has this report, subtitled ‘Position provides fresh fodder for critics who say party has hidden, hardline agenda’, on the Conservative Party’s approach to the abortion issue. You may want to read Graham Fraser’s report, as well, on Prime Minister Martin’s challenge to Stephen Harper on the abortion issue.
Tory backs death penalty
Third discrepancy for party in a week

And, as if we all weren’t concerned enough about the prospect of a Conservative government, and what that would mean for Canada, there’s this Toronto Star story detailing Ontario Conservative candidate Tom Jackson’s support for the re-instatement of the death penalty.
Jackson is the third candidate in a week to contradict party policy on a hot-button issue.
Scott Reid was forced to resign his post as the party’s official languages critic after calling for cuts to minority-language services.
Harper was forced to contradict Rob Merrifield, the party’s health critic, after he said women seeking abortions should get third-party counselling.
And, yesterday, Harper opened the door on another controversial issue when he said he believes the Supreme Court would back off if a Parliament led by him spoke its mind on the issue of same-sex marriage. Harper personally favours reserving marriage for heterosexuals.
For insight into Stephen Harper’s policies, as well as important 2004 federal election news events, click on VanRamblings’ full Decision Canada coverage.

Decision Canada: Liberals Trend Up, Momentum Returns


ELECTION-2004




DAY11-26-DAYS-REMAINING


He we are at the end of Day 11 of the federal election campaign, as the Natural Governing Party seems to have fortuitously reversed their calimitous slide in popular support among Canadians, and all is well once again in the universe.
Ian Welsh, at Tilting at Windmills, suggests that the Liberals should build on their newfound momentum by running on the Liberal record. Yes, you read right. And, it’s a damn fine idea, too.
Here’s an extended, edited, excerpt of Welsh’s column …

You’ve got a good record on the most important issue. The Economy. The U.S. just went through a recession. During the same period the Canadian economy added two million jobs. If that’s happened in living memory I’m not aware of it. You were the Finance Minister who set up the fundamentals that made it happen. Tell people that. Let’s run through this point by point.

  • Talk up the good parts of the Liberal record, especially the economy.
  • While doing so, talk about the pain of paying down the deficit you inherited from the Conservatives.
  • Talk about the 2 million jobs gained due to having the lowest corporate taxes and lowest cost of business in the OECD.
  • Mention that again, and inquire why Harper wants even lower corporate taxes?
  • Talk about Iraq. Canadians are bloody grateful that Canada isn’t involved in that mess. Harper would have taken Canada in.
  • Mention that you stand by the right to abortion. See above for why this won’t hurt you.
  • Mention how much you love Bilingualism and how it is a Liberal policy you’d never abandon.
  • Talk about foreign affairs and trade policy. You seem to love this stuff — talk about it. You may think people don’t care, but they do (see the point on Iraq above). It’s a federal responsbility and the fact that you’re good at it will come through.

To summarize: Act like you’re a Liberal and proud of it. Highlight the differences between you and Harper. Don’t do that by attacking him personally, do it by talking about things like abortion, bilingualism, deficts and so on in a way that implies that your opposition is against all these things. Run against Mike Harris and Ralph Klein. People will understand what you’re saying.

Let’s hope someone at Liberal party headquarters surfs to Welsh’s blog.
In continuing coverage of the election, Ian King — over at Vancouver Scrum — points VanRamblings towards a thought-provoking article by the Toronto Star’s Tonda MacCharles, who puts Stephen Harper’s recently-announced law-and-order platform through a reality check. The reality, she suggests, is that the Conservatives’ “lock-and-key policy means Canadians would pay a hefty price, both in individual rights recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada, and in sheer dollars and cents.”
On Thursday, the Liberals will announce a $5-billion promise to create 300,000 licensed child-care spaces. A major plank in their election platform, the Liberals plan — called the Foundations Program — will adopt Québéc’s $7-a-day daycare scheme as a model for the rest of the country.
Writing in today’s Calgary Herald, columnist Don Martin says that in spite of early problems for the Liberal campaign, it’s a bit early to engage in a death-watch for Paul Martin and the Liberal Party. In the coming days, he writes, journalists will focus on how Stephen Harper would govern. And that can only help the cause of both the Liberals and the New Democrats.
For insight into Stephen Harper’s policies, as well as important 2004 federal election news events, click on VanRamblings’ full Decision Canada coverage.