All posts by Raymond Tomlin

About Raymond Tomlin

Raymond Tomlin is a veteran journalist and educator who has written frequently on the political realm — municipal, provincial and federal — as well as on cinema, mainstream popular culture, the arts, and technology.

Stories of a Life | Love at First Sight | September & October 2012

World cinema promotes understanding, peace, harmony and humanity.

Anyone who knows me, knows that I live for film, and for the past 37 years have attended the annual Vancouver International Film Festival each spring (in the early years) and autumn since the inception of VIFF in 1981.
For me, VIFF has provided a sense of connection to the larger world around me, and occurs as a humanizing event in my life, helping me to remember that no matter where we live across our planet – be it in Kenya, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Chile, Italy, Sweden, Vietnam, Guatemala or Iran – the issues we all confront in our daily lives are the same: wont and need, reconciliation with family and the need for understanding, pending environmental collapse, housing as a human right, love, tragedy, personal disaster, rage, injustice and how over time it becomes clearer and clearer how necessary it is that we all work together for change to improve the conditions of our lives, our family’s life and the lives of those around us, to make ours a more inclusive and more socially just world for all, no matter where we live, no matter our ethnicity or sexual orientation, or our economic circumstance, we are all one, and must learn to work together.

The Vancity Theatre ... early morning lineups for the early September advance screenings for 2012's 31st annual The Vancouver International Film FestivalThe Vancity Theatre … early morning lineups for the early September advance screenings, at 2012’s 31st annual Vancouver International Film Festival (VIFF)

In the first week of each September dating back to 2005 — when the Vancity Theatre opened — VIFF administrators have held an early morning press conference mid-week at the Vancity Theatre. Some 365 films are introduced, programmers talk excitedly about the films that will be coming to that particular year’s festival, a teaser trailer is shown, Festival Director Alan Franey — if you beg and plead — will provide insight into his favourite films that will screen during the Festival, after which about 120 folks, including actors, directors and producers of Canadian films that will screen at the Festival, repair to the reception area to consume delicious noshing canapés (“hey, we’re indigent writers & actors, it’s our meal for the day!”).
And then the fun really begins …
The very next day — on Thursday — starting at 10am, VIFF commences advance screenings of films where directors, actors and producers for the advance screening films will be present during the Festival. About 30 members of the press, complemented by about 80 festival pass-holders line up outside the Vancity, and after we’ve done our waiting in line, scurry in to find the seats where we’ll remain for the next six hours, losing ourselves in the cinema of the world, the cinema of despair, the cinema of hope.
2012. Noon. Break between films. Vancity Theatre. Sitting in the back row is Len, a Richmond-based filmmaker, and veteran Vancouver Film Festival attendee. As we rise together — I’m sitting in the fourth row from the front of the theatre in the middle of the row, Len is sitting in the back row near the south exit. Except this year for the first time, there is a woman nudging beside him as he stands — would it be fair to say, a beautiful woman, a goddess with an aura around her, an entirely angelic beneficent presence, for she is all of that, a young Botticelli madonna brought to life.
Love, at first sight. Kismet. Magnificent, life-changing, transcendent love.
As I make my way to the south stairway to rise toward Len, looking at me he says, “This is my friend, Julienne. We’re making a film together, a documentary. This is Raymond — he writes about the Festival.”
Julienne is grace in human form, polite verging on deferential. The three of us engage in a repartee, on which subjects I cannot recall.
Julienne looks at me. Clearly, she sees that I cannot move. I am awestruck in her seraphic presence — which I hope against hope she has not sensed, but who am I kidding .. of course she has. But Julienne does not let on, as she sets about to create a protective space, so that my heart will not break.
Each day for the next three weeks, it proves much the same — three, as many as five films screening in advance each day Monday through Thursday, polite conversation between films, talk about the documentary Julienne and Len were making. And I behaved myself — which is unusual for me, because most years I am utterly out of control for the duration of the film festival period, so alive, so lacking in sleep, moved to tears by so many films, in so much despair yet feeling so much hope, falling in love every minute with the women on the screen, with the young, socially gifted women VIFF volunteers — joy verging on madness. But 2012? I was calm.

A line-up outside the Granville 7 cinema, home to the 2012 Vancouver International Film Festival

As is the case with a great many film festival devotees, in the week before the festival is officially to get underway, I create a daily schedule for the 16-day duration of the festival — usually five films, sometimes six or even seven films — that I will see each day, the film schedule based on input from Alan Franey or other festival staff, buzz from film-goers, awards from a dozen other film festivals, and reviews in the New York and Los Angeles Times, Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Screen Daily, Britain’s The Guardian and The Telegraph, and a retinue of other print & online sources.

j-b-shayne-and-ray-tomlin-at-the-festival-oct-6-09.jpgShowbiz Shayne, and the ineffable Mr. Know-It-All

My friend, J.B. Shayne, for two decades and more accompanied me to the Vancouver International Film Festival, giving me the nickname, Mr. Know-It-All (J.B. billed himself as Showbiz Shayne). One doesn’t know the meaning of the word insufferable until you’ve encountered me pontificating on one film or other, or what to see that day, or some inside festival scoop, while waiting endlessly in line to gain entrance to one venue or another.
The first day of the 2012 Vancouver International Film Festival, J.B. and I were a little blurry-eyed, lined up outside the Granville 7 cinema waiting to pick up our entrance tickets for the day’s screenings, the first one of which would unspool at 10am. As per usual, in a state of near madness, personalized festival schedule in hand, 100 hundred films lovingly and carefully chosen for both J.B.’s and my viewing pleasure (although we don’t attend all screenings together), me in an excited state of near derangement, dogmatic about the films, “You just must see, take my word for it …” offering my opinion on the work of a particular European director or other, her or his oeuvre and body of work, a crowd gathering around me, present for this early morning devolution into insanity … when …
Julienne, standing in line some ways in front of me, unseen by me, approached. Approached to correct me.
What followed was a professorial treatise on the history of film made ‘live’, and where this particular director fell into the timeline of the history of film and the arts, whose work he was drawing from, the lighting technique innovative and all his own, lambent always with just a touch of sheen, his use of time and space, how he moves the actors around on screen … making it quite plain to everyone standing around that I was but a mere novice on the history of film, a charlatan, an imposter, a pretender, perhaps even a buffoon. And for the first time in 20 years, I was truly in love.
Julienne was angelic in her presentation of information, her love and respect for me infusing her every word of criticism, each word a hug, a kiss, a warm embrace. Here was someone who truly loved me, cared for me, wished to make her presence known and felt, her words a devotion to me, fealty made extant, as real and palpable, as moving and transcendently lovely as anything I have ever experienced in my life, every word uttered by her one of utter respect, and true love and appreciation.
After Julienne completed her discourse on cinematic history, those around us turned away, as it was clear that for Julienne and I there was only the two of us, Julienne and I now standing close, standing side by side, almost touching, Julienne asking to see the schedule of films I had in my right hand. Turning over my personalized VIFF schedule to her, Julienne did the same for me. As she perused my VIFF schedule, I looked at her film schedule — barely recognizing any of the films on her filmgoing agenda, all of the films on my schedule vetted through weeks of painstaking research.
Without hesitation, looking at her list of scheduled VIFF films, I made a decision: for me, this would be the Julienne festival. I threw away my film schedule, knowing that it was essential that I attend at a screening of every film on Julienne’s list. And so it was. We attended every one of her chosen films together, well more than 80 films over the course of sixteen days, never sitting even remotely close to one another at any one of the screenings, for as it is me for me, it is for Julienne: the Vancouver International Film Festival represents the church of cinema

” … the church and the cinema create a sense of sacred space with their high ceilings, long aisles running the length of the darkened rooms inside, the use of dim lighting, the sweeping curvature of the walls, and the use of curtains to enhance the sacredness of the experience.

The seating, and the opening introduction by a VIFF manager constituting a liturgy for one and all, not dissimilar to the welcoming ritual that occurs in a church service prior to the sermon.

There is, too, the notion that as the film limns your unconscious mind you are being transported, elevated in some meaningful way, left in awe in the presence of a work of film art.

At the Vancouver International Film Festival, there is the vague, unshakable notion that the eternal and invisible world is all around us, transporting us as we sit in rapt attention. We experience the progress and acceleration of time, as we see life begin, progress, and find redemption. All within two hours. The films at the Vancouver International Film Festival constituting much more than entertainment; each film a thoughtful meditation on our place in society and our purpose in life.

Cinema emerging as that place where we might experience life in the form of parable, within a safe and welcoming environment, that place where we are able to become vulnerable and open, hungry to make sense of our lives. Cinema delivers for Julienne and I, as it does for many, access to the new spiritualism, the place where we experience not merely film, but language, memory, art, love, death and, perhaps even, spiritual transcendence.”

And so it went, from early morning til late at night, until one morning while the two of us were in line, a friend came up to Julienne and I, saying …

“What the two of you are doing is disgusting. Raymond, Julienne is 30 years younger than you. She’s a married woman, yet the two of you carry on like you are lovers. Leave her alone. The two of you have no business spending any time together. Stop it. Stop it now!”

Even before Diana finished her denunciation of the two of us, Julienne was crying, tears trickling, then cascading down her cheeks, unable to catch her breath, unable to reply. I wanted to hold Julienne, tell her that all would be fine. But I had not touched Julienne, nor had we or did we intend to have any sort of physical contact, ever. Ours was a love that existed on another plane, our relationship — by which I mean to say, that we related as friends and colleagues, our respect for one another based on an intellectual and spiritual rapport. But physical love? Never would that occur, Never, ever would we together disrespect Julienne’s lovely and generous husband, Bill.
Julienne, finally gathering herself together, her voice catching, was able to utter the words …

“I am so, so sorry, Diana. Raymond and I are friends, that’s all. He has a keen intelligence. I have two PhDs, one in economics and one in medicine. I have taught economics at the Sorbonne, and worked at the Mayo Clinic, yet most days I am unable to keep up with Raymond, his mind is so vibrant, his vast knowledge on the broadest range of academia — save the sciences, where I am wont to point out to him, his knowledge is quite lacking — our rapport entirely intellectual, the joy we experience in one another’s company based solely on an intellectual plane of curiosity, and the desire to learn more, to know more, to be challenged. Somehow the two of us have found one another in time and space, perhaps knowing one another in another life, kismet as Raymond has called it. I would say that is all it is — but all that it is is so great, and so very much appreciated by the two of us that I am taken aback, and profoundly hurt that you would judge me, that you would judge the two of us, that you would think for even one moment that we would ever wish to cause harm, to cause anyone harm. You have referred to Raymond as your friend, in past conversations with me. Diana, a friend does not speak or use the language of judgment you employed in setting about to destroy what is for Raymond and I beauty in our lives, a meeting across the universe.”

And with that, Julienne turned and walked away, the two of us not spending one more moment together for the remaining nine days of the festival.
Then ten minutes following Diana’s denunciation of Julienne, in particular, and me only by association, Diana and her companion, Graham, J.B. and I foregoing the 10am screening found ourselves at the Granville & Smithe Starbucks looking for a coffee, certainly not to calm our jangled nerves, silence between the four us, until we were all seated, me now rising

“What the fuck did you think you were doing, Diana? You made Julienne cry, Julienne who is as close to an angel on Earth as I have ever encountered. Julienne the personification of loveliness and grace, who would never hurt anyone, nor cause anyone a moment’s concern.

What the fuck were you thinking confronting the two of us on the street? And what business is it of yours, anyway, what I do or don’t do with any person of my acquaintance, particularly when it is as clear to you as it would be to anyone with eyes and a heart, that there is — now was, I fear — a joy that was passing between the two of us, when joy is a commodity in rare possession these days. What in hell would cause you to interfere? Did you, perhaps, think that you were defending Bill’s honour, Bill with whom Julienne and I attend evening screenings together, with me sitting on the other side of the cinema, as per usual, from where Bill and Julienne are sitting. Do you think so little of me, do you think me so lacking in honour and integrity and human compassion, so self-serving and unconscious of the love that Bill and Julienne have for one another that I would, or that Julienne would, engage in behaviour that would be ruinous and contrary to both our natures? Diana — fuck off, never pull that shit around me again. Keep your sick and twisted thoughts to yourself, and never ever speak to me again in the way you did on the street just minutes ago. And one more thing — stay the fuck away from Julienne, don’t ever hurt her again.”

And with that said, I left the Starbucks.
Julienne and I did see one another at the annual Saturday morning, post-festival brunch at The Bellagio, on Hornby at Robson, across from the Vancouver Art Gallery, where 20 or so diehard festival-goes gather each year to debrief on all that has occurred at VIFF over the course of the past month and more, the food and service great, the company — almost everyone present more accomplished than myself, healthy of body and mind and intellect, and inveterate life long lovers of cinema, particularly world cinema — Julienne sitting on the other side and at the end of the table, distant from me. The two of us did not speak. Nor did our eyes meet.
Bill and Julienne and I did get together three more times in the weeks after the festival had ended, for dinner, for a coffee, and for a dessert one late evening. We all got along famously, but it wasn’t too difficult to discern that what had transpired between Julienne and I from early September to early October 2012 could, and would, no longer occur. And, of course, there was the Diana incident. Julienne took a job that required much of her time, and although we communicated from time to time, sometimes in a phone call, more often — but only sporadically — by e-mail, never initiated by me. And then, barely noticing it, the two of us drifted apart … until …

Baguette & Co., 3273 West Broadway, in Vancouver

In mid-summer of 2016, I contracted hilar cholangeocarcinoma, a terminal, inoperable form of cancer that was most assuredly going to kill me, sooner than later. Do you recall reading earlier in this story that Julienne had acquired a PhD from the Mayo Clinic?
Turns out that Julienne had trained at the Mayo Clinic under Dr. Gerald Klatskin, best known for his work on the biochemical and biological abnormalities and the clinical features of the diseased liver, but who was also the doctor to first identify and develop a treatment — an operative intervention actually, a rebuilding of the entire bile duct and intestinal system, and replacement of the liver — for hilar cholangeocarcinoma.
Hilar cholangeocarcinoma is often called Klatskin’s tumour, where the bile duct system — a series of tubes or tracts, sometimes called the biliary tract — connects all the elements of the intestinal system to the liver in order that the body’s proteins and materials the body can’t use are eliminated.

Now, I already had a scientist friend — another of the great loves of my life, Alison Fitch, who for the past 10 years has run a multi-billion dollar biotech lab in Seattle, and wouldn’t you know that one of the projects her lab was working on was a cellular intervention to mitigate the growth of cancer cells in the intestinal system, and in the biliary tract and bile duct system, in particular. You wonder why I’m still alive when I was supposed to be dead, at the very latest, a year ago today?
Both Julienne and Alison played key roles in my recovery — one can have great doctors and surgeons, and I did, but it is quite another thing to have women who love you, women who are skilled and are scientists and who love you, who are committed to finding treatments to prolong your life, and working on a “cure”, or at least an intervention that will allow you to live in good health for the next 30 years, while keeping the cancer at bay, women who are on your side, adamant that as long as they’re around, you will be.
In February 2017, when it still appeared that I was a goner — not that Alison or Julienne were going to let that stand — Julienne asked if we might go to lunch at Baguette and Co. on West Broadway, near my home, that she wanted to introduce me to David, whom she and Bill had adopted in Chile, where Julienne was born, and where she and Bill had spent the better part of a year working through the adoption process (why and how it was that Julienne and I had lost contact, she and Bill needing months to help David adjust to his new home in Canada).
David, 2½ years of age, when we were at lunch together — a lunch that lasted some three hours, Julienne and I having much catching up to do in this leisurely setting — focused only on ourselves and David, with no talk of cancer, but only of joy, a joy that was clearly evident in David’s demeanour, a joy his parents shared with him, David an angel on Earth as much as is the case with his mother, Julienne. Julienne told me that Bill and she had attempted to, and believed they were successful in helping to, create a sense of safety and love for David, that since his arrival in Canada the year previous, he had not cried, nor experienced any emotion other than joy, his life so full of love and goodness and warmth and the love of his parents — to see Bill together with David is to witness the same love that Julienne has for her son, the most hopeful love it has been my privilege to witness.
David’s record of no tears was about to come to a bitter — and, really, there’s no other way of saying it, tragic — end, a part of one of ugliest incidents I have ever been party to, and all arising from an unforgivably heinous, revolting and extremely ugly intervention by my daughter, Megan.
With whom I had spoken at some length over the summer, she telling me, “Dad, I’m raising my sons (my two grandsons, Sasha and Leo) the same way you raised me,” about which she went into some detail, and with then Vancouver School Board trustee Christopher Richardson by my side at the opening of the new General Gordon elementary school — where my two grandsons are enrolled — with Megan, her engineer husband, Maz and Leo nearby, Megan saying my two favourite words, “Hi, daddy,” then putting her arms around me, and then her arm in mine, Maz standing opposite, Leo playing, Christopher standing off to the side, as pleasant and as warm & loving an interaction as any father would wish to have with the daughter he loves with all his heart, who he has known since birth to be the toughest, brightest, most heart-filled person I’ve ever encountered (in all the years I raised her, Megan was the most transcendently lovely and intellectually acute person of whose life I had ever been a part — but tough, omigawd tough, as well as the most socially skilled person I’ve ever known).
When I was diagnosed with hilar cholangeocarcinoma in the late summer of 2016, I spoke with my son, Jude — who was supportive and loving through my months long cancer journey — leaving a message for Megan that I wished to speak with her, calling her mother, Cathy afterwards to ask if she might intervene to mitigate any pain Megan might feel in hearing of my terminal, inoperable cancer diagnosis.
I have yet to write about my cancer journey, and will likely set about to do so once the current Vancouver civic election is over, but for the purposes of this Story of a Life, suffice to say that subsequent to the call I made to Megan in September, and the half dozen or so calls I made to her in succeeding months, when the news about my cancer was getting worse and worse and worse, me needing to hear her voice on voicemail, that Megan had no contact with me, did not as I suggested to her visit with our family physician, Dr. Brad Fritz, or in any other way intervene throughout the eight months I was told my cancer was terminal, my death imminent.
About 2:45pm on that early February afternoon Julienne, David and I were meeting, on this unseasonably warm and sunny February day, after our lunch Julienne asked if I might walk with her and David to Macdonald Street, in order that she and David might catch the bus home. While we were walking up 7th Avenue toward Macdonald, Julienne asked if there was a school nearby, and I said there was, General Gordon, where my grandsons were enrolled. Julienne told me that she and Bill were looking at moving into the neighbourhood, in order to find a good school for David to attend kindergarten — Julienne thought she might drop into the school to speak briefly with the principal, to set up a meeting for a future date.
But that did not happen.
Instead, shortly after 3pm when Julienne, David and I were near to General Gordon school, David spotted the playground and the playground equipment, and ran over to play on the slide and teeter-totter, round-about and other playscape items on the school’s grounds. While David played, a number of kindergarten age and younger children playing nearby, David was full of smiles, as was his mother, the moment one of joy, until …
Megan — my 41-year-old daughter, who I held in my arms for the first 10 minutes of her life, as Cathy was still under anaesthetic, who I raised from the time she was a baby, through her years at UBC — walked up to Julienne and I, her face twisted and unforgiving — something I’d never seen before with Megan, a monstrous look — looking at me, saying in a bare whisper, “I love you,” after which she turned to Julienne, not introducing herself so Julienne had no indication as to who was speaking with her, and said …

“He’s probably told you that he’s going to die. That’s bullshit. He’s only looking for sympathy. Look at him. He looks the same way he always has. There’s nothing wrong with him. You’re being a fool if you believe that there’s anything wrong with him, other than he’s sick in the head …”

At which point David looked over — Julienne’s attention consumed by Megan’s vicious diatribe, Julienne now in tears — a look of alarm on David’s face, a crestfallen look of fear. I immediately went over to David, who was the priority in this circumstance. David wanted his mother.
Megan was still yelling at Julienne, Megan an out of control madwoman, Julienne in response now subject to heaving sobs, David running towards his mother, David now crying, too, inconsolably, both mother and son so emotionally flooded that even in her state of madness, with one adult and one child before her crying in pain, Megan left, yelling some epithet or other at Julienne.
Julienne looked at me, and through tears and sobbing, said, “Raymond, you didn’t say anything.” I took Julienne and David over to sit down, to calm Julienne, David now wailing and inconsolable, David wrapped tightly in Julienne’s arms. I was able to calm Julienne, which took a good five minutes. With Julienne now calm and no longer crying, with David still crying and inconsolable, but quieter now, his face buried in his mother’s chest, I responded to the statement Julienne had made only minutes earlier …

“Julienne, this past six months has brought one piece of tragic news after another. I decided early on that if I was going to live, I would need to establish an equilibrium in my life, and never react to any situation, never give up any control in my life over which I have jurisdiction. If I reacted to all the news I’ve heard on almost a daily basis these past six months, I’d be dead, from fear. I decided a long time ago I would not allow fear to rule my life through my cancer journey, and afterwards should I find myself subject to a miracle. I will not relinquish what little control I have over my life, I will not react, as I did not react this afternoon. If I were to do so, I feel quite assured that I would be sounding the death knell for my life.”

At which point, Julienne — David in her arms, arose saying, “We should go, Raymond. I have to get David home. I’ve got to put some dinner on.”

In Vancouver, West 7th Avenue, just west of Macdonald Street, east of General Gordon school

But it took another 15 minutes to make it the one block to Macdonald, Julienne and David stopping along West 7th Avenue, she concentrating on David’s recovery, his sobs still prominent, his demeanour inconsolable. Finally, David released his tight hold on his mother, putting his feet on the ground, putting one step in front of the other, his body still heaving.
The three of us did make it Macdonald Street, now back in the sun, the time close to 4pm, Julienne now saying that she wanted to walk with David and I over to West 4th Avenue to catch the Macdonald bus — which she did, but not before turning to me, for the first and what would assuredly be the last time, placing her arms around me in an embrace, a tight hug that said, “Raymond, I need assurance that all will be well.”
And then, Julienne and David were gone.
I have told you that I love Julienne. And I do with all my heart — but as I told Bill the next day …

“It seems fated that Julienne and I cannot ever have a relationship. It’s just too dangerous for her. I wish it wasn’t so, because as you know, I love your wife, and there exists between us a rapport of kindness and connection, and an intellectual curiosity that is challenging and rewarding for the two of us. But I will never see Julienne again, nor you or David. I am so very, very sorry for what happened to your wife yesterday. I wish I knew what to say. I simply can’t find the words.”

After walking with Julienne to the bus that tragic afternoon, while slowly making my way home, I called my son to tell him what had happened. Jude was generous, kind and supportive, saying to me by way of explanation …

“That wasn’t Megan speaking today. That was mom speaking. Mom has filled Megan’s head so full of lies and hate, Megan is so conflicted, the entire circumstance of the dysfunction of our lives arising from Cathy’s morbidity, that I don’t know what can be done to repair a family situation so rent that there seems no way of putting the pieces back to make us whole again. I love you. Megan loves you. Maybe some day Megan will get away from Cathy’s influence, maybe some day Megan will make her way back to you in a healthy and whole way — but first she’s going to have to get away from the influence of mom, who will just keep on buying Megan off with trips and the promise of purchasing a new home for her, and as she has always set about to do, buying Megan’s affection, but surely not her love, because although mom is many things, one of those things is certainly not lovable. Forget about what happened today. Concentrate on getting better, or if you’re not going to get better, if your time on this Earth is fated to end soon, then enjoy every day you have left.”

No Julienne in my life, a woman I love. A caring and loving son, though. A conflicted daughter. And, an ex-wife who seemingly wants to destroy me.
And, another story of a life.

Arts Friday | Gosh, It’s May | It Must Be the Upfronts | Television

The 2018 Upfronts, when the major American networks present their new fall TV shows

In the merry, merry month of May each year, VanRamblings looks forward to two singular events: the Cannes Film Festival — which we’ll write about when, in August, the fine folks at the Vancouver International Film Festival announce the Cannes 2018 films that’ll play the 37th VIFF — and the annual “upfronts” roll-out. Upfronts, you say? What in tarnation is that?
Each May, the five major broadcast television networks in the U.S. announce their ‘hopeful new hits’ set to début in the fall, the action-packed dramas, the star-studded tug at your heartstrings programmes, and the laugh-riot comedies the networks hope you’ll tune into each week. There’s advertising money to acquire to contribute to the networks’ bottom line.
We’re talking a multi-million dollar business here, where your eyes on the screen translates into hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for the networks — broadcast networks that are not dead yet, despite the emergence of Netflix, cable networks like FX, and online programming.
If you’re a pop culture fanatic as we are, this is a salutary time of year.
A story. In 1975 VanRamblings began our first full-time, permanent job as a teacher. We loved teaching, thought the kids (and their parents) were great, and enjoyed and appreciated every moment of the time we were privileged to spend inside a classroom, imparting wisdom and hope, a love for learning and the acquisition of knowledge, and the building of character.

Two-year-old Jude Nathan Tomlin, baby Megan Jessica, and dad, Raymond, in June 1977VanRamblings pictured above with our two children, baby Megan Jessica & Jude Nathan

So, there we were: bearded, a sort of long-haired hippie (pictured above with our kids), teaching in the Interior. Kids fantastic. Parents great. Having the time of our young life. Go to the teacher’s lunchroom at recess and lunch. What does everyone talk about? Last night’s hilarious episode of All in the Family, Happy Days or the Mary Tyler Moore show.
Had we seen any of those programmes while we were attending university? Did Cathy and I have a TV? Is the Pope Polish (no, he’s not)?
First acquisition upon receiving our September mid-month cheque? Yep — a brand, spanking new and pretty darn skookum colour television set.
And, why not? Owning a TV provided an inroad into discussions with my students, on values, on different kinds of humour, on how television shows were made, and the dilemmas their favourite TV characters were experiencing in their ‘lives’. Same thing in the teacher lunchroom — talking about last night’s television programme quickly developed into a friendly and open camaraderie, and the development of rapport and closeness.
VanRamblings is no pointy-headed intellectual, no ideologue for whom television represents the opiate of the masses. Please. A life, you want a life — you’ll find one right over there. VanRamblings? We seek human connection, and respect for those around us, if they’ll give us half a chance.

The 2018 Upfronts, when the major American networks present their new fall TV shows

This autumn, there are 18 new programmes that are set to début on TV, and invade your consciousness.
Last year’s breakout hit was ABC’s The Good Doctor, which films at Surrey City Hall. The year before it was NBC’s This is Us, which remained a ratings generating powerhouse throughout its second season.
What can’t miss television show will break out in the fall and keep you glued to your television set? We’re not really going to know until July, when TV critics from across North America travel to Los Angeles for the annual star-infused junket overdose of all the new broadcast network programmes set to début two months later.
Okay, now to the good stuff. Trailers for all — well, six anyway, of — the new programmes. We’re not sure how they’ll render on your smart phone or tablet, so you may want to take at look at the trailers on your computer at home, if you’ve got one — which fewer and fewer people do these days.

Setting itself up to be the first new show to be cancelled in the fall, Manifest is a time travel via turbulence programme. Like they always work. As Kristen Baldwin in Entertainment Weekly said, “So it’s kind of like Lost meets all those shows where people come back from the dead and haven’t aged.” Yep. Pretty cast, though, and heart-tugging trailer. Manifest is up against NBC’s The Good Doctor — like we said, first to be cancelled.

Monday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Here’s one we like, which the critics seem not to. Maybe it’s because FBI stars Canadian actress Missy Peregrym, and we kinda liked her on Rookie Blue, ABC’s now cancelled summer replacement programme.

FBI will be broadcast on Tuesday nights on CBS, at 9pm, although one of the Canadian networks is bound to pick up the programme. Our Canadian CBC, CTV, Global and City television networks will announce their autumn schedules at press conferences to be held in Toronto next month.

Tuesday night American broadcast television networks schedule

The target market for the upstart CW network (owned by CBS) are young people, thus a new ethnically diverse Wednesday night programme with a driving beat, good looking young folks, with a PG-rated taste of sex and violence meant to appeal to a younger demographic. Could work.

All American will début in September on the CW, Wednesday’s at 9pm.

Wednesday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Ah yes, the first comedy to make our list — which, although we’re not a big fan of television comedies, looks like it could do fine, with a lot of relatability, and that cast. Bad time slot, though — I Feel Bad is going to have to break out early, and top the ratings in its time slot if its gonna survive, not an easy thing to do on the half hour, when you’re up against two programmes that started at 9 o’ clock. Still and all, I Feel Bad looks like it has potential, and Thursday’s are the most-watched television night of the week — which has been the case for a long, long time. American actress Sarayu Blue seems like a winning lead, too, so you never know.

Thursday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Friday night television is for the sad and lonely senior citizen. Hey, that’s us! CBS has a lock on Friday nights with McGyver (never watched it), Hawaii Five-O (which is getting a little long in the tooth), and Blue Bloods, which we never miss! Hey, it’s soothing — and not too over-the-top right wing. Youse takes your pleasures where you find ’em, we always say.
There is one new programme on Friday nights (see above), a comedy starring Martin Mull, who we haven’t seen a very long time, titled The Cool Kids. Ah, thanks Fox — calling us old geezer kids. You shouldn’t have.
No, really — you shouldn’t have.

Friday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Sundays. Heck, we’re just glad that CBS didn’t cancel Madam Secretary. There’s something vaguely reassuring watching a TV show depicting an engaged, involved American President gifted with wit and political acumen, who actually cares about the state of the world. And Téa Leoni as the keenly intelligent Secretary of State, with Tim Daly as her supportive and bright husband — and those kids, I want to adopt ’em all. Wow! Otherwise, it’s pretty thin gruel on Sunday nights, cuz of that darned NBC Football — like whoever watches that? Oh. Tens of millions. Okay, sorry about that.
Remember how we mentioned heart-tugging at the top of today’s column. Yeah, me too. Sundays on CBS at 8pm, God Friended Me (trailer above), we’re thinking break-out hit. Already, we’re in love with Violett Beane as Cara Bloom. And Brandon Micheal Hall as conflicted Miles Finer — looks like he’s landed on his feet just fine after ABC cancelled The Mayor last May.

Sunday night American broadcast television networks schedule

Hey, God Friended Me — a decent programme to watch at 8pm on Sunday nights, if you’ve got nothing else going on, or you just want to lay back, and get yourself in the head space to return to work on Monday.

A Master Class on Meeting Conduct, and Democratic Engagement

At each meeting of the Vancouver School Board Chairperson Janet Fraser offers a Master Class in respectful democratic engagement

There exists in our city, governance serving the public interest that sets the standard for democratic engagement — the likes of which VanRamblings does not recall ever previously having witnessed in the public realm.
We are, of course, speaking of the work of Chairperson of the Vancouver School Board, Janet Fraser, who meeting in, meeting out conducts a Master Class on how one must conduct a meeting, efficiently and well, in the public interest, respectful meetings of democratic engagement, where the Board of Education trustees are encouraged to work as a team — and woebetide the person who does not accede to Dr. Fraser’s unspoken ordinance.

Dr. Janet Fraser, Chairperson of the Vancouver School Board

For Dr. Janet Fraser, outward appearance to the contrary, is a tough as nails, brooks no nonsense, respectful, engaged, informed, demands the best from those sitting around the VSB Board of Education table, who absolutely and utterly does not ever allow untoward commentary to stand — the finest and most democratic public official, and Chairperson of any civic body we have ever had the privilege of witnessing.
A story. Early in her term as Vancouver School Board Chairperson, Janet Fraser allowed One City Vancouver trustee Carrie Bercic to move a motion that would see the newly-elected trustees working with staff to ensure the timely hiring of teachers and other educators, so as to meet the conditions of the November 2015 ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Ms. Bercic, even as early as the beginning of her term as school board trustee, was making it clear to anyone with ears to listen that she would be the new conscience of the Vancouver School Board ‘Board of Education’, as has proven to be the case throughout the course of 2018.
Veteran trustee Allan Wong, in support of trustee Bercic, seconded her motion, the motion now open for discussion, recently-elected Chairperson Fraser presiding at the head of the Board of Education table. Early reception for trustee Bercic’s motion was not salutary, with both Vancouver Non-Partisan Association trustees Fraser Ballantyne and Lisa Dominato, as might well be expected, speaking against “interference” by trustees in the work of administrative staff. Trustee Wong spoke in support of trustee Bercic’s motion, as did his Vision Vancouver colleague, Joy Alexander, while their colleague Ken Clement chose not to weigh in on the matter.
Trustee Estrellita Gonzalez, a novice in political life, looked on, attempting to weigh what she heard. And what trustee Gonzalez heard next, from her Green Party of Vancouver colleague, Dr. Judy Zaichowski rocked the meeting, sounding the death knell for trustee Bercic’s motion …

“Never have I heard such a poorly worded motion” trustee Zaichkowski proclaimed. “Trustee Bercic seems not to know what it is she is attempting to move, injudiciously unclear in her intent — quite honestly, I cannot make head nor tail of what trustee Bercic is attempting to accomplish. From what I’ve read, looking at her motion — a motion which she did not discuss with me, nor to the best of my knowledge, with other of the trustees around this table — I would suggest that, perhaps, “she” might benefit from one of the courses on ‘Clear Communication’ I teach at Simon Fraser University in the Beedie School of Business. I will not be supporting Ms. Bercic’s motion, and stand adamantly against it.”

A hush fell over the room. Trustee Gonzalez seeming to weigh no longer on how she would vote — she would cast her vote in the negative.
Meanwhile, trustees Dominato and Ballantyne seemed thunderstruck — it is usual business at the school board table that Fraser Ballantyne is the one who acts out. Meanwhile, Joy Alexander — always calm, had a look of alarm in her eyes, while you could almost hear trustee Wong’s thoughts on the matter (“Never in my 19 years as a trustee on school board, have I ever witnessed …”), while trustee Clement looked on, disbelieving of what he’d just heard — for this group of trustees, perhaps with one notable exception, are persons of conscience, as humane and caring of the public process that leads to the decisions that affect the lives of thousands as may be found on any publicly-elected body. All the while, even though it was but mere seconds, Chairperson Fraser sat at the head of the table, her face inscrutable, her thoughts unreadable. And then Dr. Fraser spoke

“Around this school board table, trustees speak to and about one another with respect. Trustee Zaichkowski (ed. note, one of the two Green Party trustees elected last October, along with Dr. Fraser), despite your statement and suggestion to the contrary, I feel quite assured that you know exactly what trustee Bercic’s motion intends. How could you not? The content and activism of trustee Bercic’s motion is as clear as day to me, as I am sure is the case with all of my other trustee colleagues sitting around this table this evening — clearly with the exception of yourself, if I am to believe what you said earlier … and I do not.

I will be supporting trustee Bercic’s motion, as I hope would be the case with my trustee colleagues, on whom I am depending for support of trustee Bercic’s motion, a motion the intent of which I clearly understand, and without reservation support. Could I now have a trustee Call the Question, so that we might vote?”

All tension in the air evaporated, you could hear the audible sighs of relief around the school board table, trustee Gonzalez was smiling for she now knew for certain how she would vote, with trustee Ballantyne speaking out of order to say, “I am fully in favour of trustee Bercic’s motion.”
Chairperson Janet Fraser asked for a show of hands, “All those in favour of trustee Bercic’s motion raise your hands.” Seven hands shot up: trustees Bercic, Wong, Alexander, Ballantyne, Clement, Dominato and Gonzalez. Chairperson Fraser next asked for a show of hand(s) for those opposed. Nothing. Trustee Zaichkowski had abstained on the motion that only minutes earlier she had spoken so vehemently against.
With the above described interaction of trustees now history, Dr. Fraser proved herself to be … how do we say it? … someone not to be fucked with. A tone was set. Dr. Janet Fraser was in charge. Going forward, members of the Vancouver School Board would work together in the best interests of children enrolled in the Vancouver school system.
Meanwhile, Dianne Turner (for whom I possess some great affection, and who is owed an apology from me … nothing too egregious, just some casual thoughtlessness on my part, if casual thoughtlessness can ever be juxtaposed with use of the word “just” … surely, a contradiction in terms) — the Official Trustee appointed by B.C. Liberal Education Minister, Mike Bernier, on behalf of the Christy Clark government, and kept on as a Special Advisor to current B.C. Education Minister, Rob Fleming, her term as Special Advisor expiring earlier this spring — looked around the room, at the gallery, at the trustees, and at Dr. Fraser. With a subtle, yet warm and reassuring smile, Ms. Turner limned the moment of reason and humanity that she had just witnessed around the school board table. You could almost hear her say, “I think they’re going to be just fine. Soon, I’ll be speaking with Minister Fleming, when I will seek to assure him that the Vancouver School Board is in good hands, and that he need not worry.”
Dr. Janet Fraser. Master Class in Meeting Conduct. Every Chairperson of every body, be it housing co-op, arts organization, elected body, or in any other forum where people come together to promote good governance and democratic decision-making would do themselves well to arrive at the offices of the Vancouver School Board this upcoming Monday evening.

Broadview Housing Co-operative, 2525 Waterloo Street, in Vancouver BC | KitsilanoBroadview Housing Co-operative, located in Vancouver’s Kitsilano neighbourhood

An Invitation to the Members of the Broadview Housing Co-operative, and to all Vancouver citizens
For anyone who is familiar with VanRamblings’ activist work in the community, you would know that we are a lifelong democrat, that we believe in respectful and informed democratic engagement, where although within a group or on an issue of contention on occasion we might disagree, we believe in humanity and what constitutes the best of us, as persons of conscience, as social activists, as engaged citizens striving always for more and better, not for ourselves — because we recognize that we are persons of privilege — but for others, for whom it is our obligation to use our privilege to make a difference in the lives of those with whom we come into contact daily, and for those whom we have not yet met, the vulnerable members of our community, for whom we harbour a deep and abiding caring, and for whom we will do our best to make theirs a better life, and in doing so give our own lives a sense of meaning and a deeper purpose.
Working together, striving to improve the lives of others, the creation of community, and a sense of social obligation defines life in housing co-ops, as it defines life in the public realm, at Council, Park and School Board.

Meeting of the 2018 Board of Education trustees with the Vancouver School Board

Why is VanRamblings inviting the members of our housing co-op, and you as citizens of Vancouver, to next Monday’s, May 28th public meeting of Vancouver School Board trustees, set to start at 7pm, at 1580 West Broadway, in the Board room at the Vancouver School Board’s head office?
In part, it’s because Broadview is a mere 19 blocks from the Vancouver School Board offices, an enjoyable walk, bike or bus ride away. And why not? Aren’t housing co-ops all about respectful, democratic engagement, and is it not important for the well-functioning not only of the Broadview Housing Co-op at our various general, finance, membership and maintenance committee meetings — but for all of us in the public weal — to strive always for better in the conduct of our lives, and in meeting engagement where decisions that have profound effect are rendered?
At next Monday’s Board of Education trustees meeting, you will see …

  • VSB Chairperson Janet Fraser working to increase engagement and teamwork among the trustees, in a meeting of passion and commitment;
  • Dr. Fraser creating an environment in the Board room where all the trustees contribute to the decision-making around the school board table, creating personal ownership of issues;
  • Chairperson Fraser setting standards for the meeting, by encouraging behaviors of respect needed for the meeting to be successful;
  • Dr. Fraser providing a sense of purpose, energy and optimism, and a sense of vision, mission and aspirational values that give meaning to the meeting, resulting in productive and demonstrably effective outcomes.

What you won’t see at meetings chaired by Dr. Fraser …

  • Cross-talk, verboten in proper and democratically-run meetings. Cross-talk occurs when someone has the floor, and others in the meeting are engaged in separate conversations, being disrespectful of the person who has the floor, and to others members present at the meeting;
  • A disrespect for Robert’s of Order, through which intimate knowledge ensures respectful, democratic decision-making by which all meeting governance must abide.

All meetings, whether at the Broadview Housing Co-operative, at City Council, School Board or Park Board must observe the rules of proper and respectful meeting conduct, and all chairpersons — whatever the body — must take their obligation as chairperson, as seriously and with as much import as does Dr. Fraser, who is as serious as death about ensuring democratic engagement will carry the day at school board, as should all persons engaged elsewhere who are charged with the responsibility of conducting respectful, fulsome and democratically-run meetings.
Victoria’s Cameo housing co-op has adopted rules of order to ensure their meetings abide by a central tenet on which Canada’s housing co-op movement was founded in the 1970s …

“The empowerment of housing co-op members, through the establishment of respectful, democratically-run meetings, occurs in order that members will feel empowered, not just around the co-op meeting table, but in the society at large, and in the public realm, so that the housing co-op movement might serve to fight against anomie, alienation, cynicism and disengagement from the decision-making that affects their lives in the municipal, provincial and federal political realm, for when a meeting is well run, when members are intimately familiar with Robert’s Rules of Order, when Co-op members are energized and engaged they might come to work with others to change the conditions of their lives, and the lives of others, so as to better serve the common good.”

Of course, in British Columbia, members of the Co-operative Housing Federation of British Columbia can avail themselves of the three-hour Good Governance and Principled Leadership workshop, where a CHF-BC staff person travels to housing co-ops to teach a simplified version of Robert’s Rules of Order, how to capably chair a meeting, how to manage difficult situations, how to make meaningful decisions in a timely and respectful manner, and how to conduct a productive meeting.
Or, as CHF-BC is wont to say …

“In a well-run co-op, meetings run smoothly. They’re a place where things get done instead of done to you. Good meetings produce sound decisions and are a positive experience for members. Bad meetings don’t get the work done and undermine morale.”

Members of Broadview are always open to ensuring that our meetings run better, are more efficient and respectful of members’ time, that decisions are arrived at thoughtfully and in a timely manner, that humanity and a respect for others around the meeting table is of prime importance for the well-functioning of not only a co-op meeting but for the interests of our housing co-operative, and the housing co-op movement, as a whole.
For we in Vancouver, and in British Columbia, are at a crossroads in the history of the provision of affordable housing. The conduct of the affairs of any of the housing co-ops in Metro Vancouver and across the province, must reflect the best values of the housing co-op movement, as respectful, member-owned-and-run affordable social housing projects — for soon, very soon, we are about to witness our municipal, provincial and federal governments embark on a housing co-op construction programme, the likes of which we have not witnessed in 40 years.

Housing Co-ops: The Solution to Vancouver's Affordable Housing Crisis

VanRamblings would then ask of Broadview members, and of you …
When such a resource as Dr. Fraser is so nearby, so readily available, the meetings she has been charged by the public to conduct, as close to beauty in the public realm as one is likely to encounter in the course of our prosaic daily lives, why would one — and members of Broadview Housing Co-op, in particular — not wish to avail themselves of nonpareil beauty extant?
And as Broadview’s Laurie and Kevin, Libbi and Yvon, Alex, Goran, Josh, Laurette and Yoshi, Judi and Max, Tatiana, Kyle, Charlotte and Richard, Tina and Shane, Joe, Jette, Heather and Jason, Natasha and Meaghan will be present this next Monday evening for the well-conducted one and a half hour, critical to the future of children enrolled in the Vancouver school system, movingly profound meeting of our Board of Education trustees …

One City’s ‘move you to tears’ social justice warrior, Carrie Bercic; Beedie School of Business professor, Dr. Judy Zaichowkski, and her quiet, yet passionately engaged Green Party colleague, Estrellita Gonzalez; retired school principal, Fraser Ballantyne, and the utterly tremendous Lisa Dominato, mom to a daughter enrolled in Grade One, and up until recently, the Director of Integrated Services and Safe Schools in B.C.’s Ministry of Education; the calming, informed, reasoned — and we think, sometimes mischievous — Joy Alexander, and her Vision Vancouver colleagues, the entirely tremendous Allan Wong, a father of daughters, and a 19-year veteran School Board trustee; and Ken Clement of the Ktunaxa First Nation, long a voice for social justice, health and housing for our indigenous peoples, and at School Board, an activist for better educational outcomes for Aboriginal students …

VanRamblings believes that you, too, must be present to witness, to avail yourselves of the opportunity to be a participant school board meeting observer, in what we assure you — and what we assure Broadview Housing Co-op members — will prove to be a transformative experience in your life, in their lives, in service to what is the best of us, democracy, respectful democratic engagement, and needed and necessary change for the better.

Vancouver Votes 2018 | Conflicted Candidate Announces for Mayor

Squamish Nation Hereditary Chief Ian Campbell Seeks Vision Vancouver Endorsement for Mayor

VanRamblings harbours a great deal of respect for retiring Vision Vancouver City Councillor Andrea Reimer, and for Stepan Vdovine — recent, and now former, Executive Director of the party that has governed Vancouver for the past almost 10 year now. We believe both to be admirable persons of honour and integrity, persons of conscience possessed of good judgment.
When Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell announced on May 14th that he would be seeking the endorsement of Vision Vancouver to become Vancouver’s next Mayor, we were surprised — and we would have to say disappointed, as well — that Ms. Reimer had signed on as co-chair of Mr. Campbell’s bid to become Vision Vancouver’s Mayoral aspirant.
We were also surprised (and disappointed, although one supposes we shouldn’t have been) that Stepan Vdovine, Mayor Gregor Robertson’s former chief of staff Mike Magee, Vision Vancouver’s former co-chairperson, Maria Dobrinskaya, and longtime Vision campaign veteran and labour activist Clay Suddaby had also signed on to Mr. Campbell’s bid to become Vancouver’s next Mayor. Ms. Reimer’s co-chair on Ian Campbell’s well-oiled-and-organized campaign is urban planner Ginger Gosnell-Myers, who resigned in March as the City of Vancouver’s aboriginal relations manager.
Why is VanRamblings disappointed that Ms. Reimer and Mr. Vdovine, in particular, have come forward as staunch supporters of Mr. Campbell?
As you’ll read today, and as you’ll read ad nauseum in the months to come should — c’mon, let’s face it, he’s a lock for the Vision Vancouver nomination — Mr. Campbell emerge as the well-financed and Vision Vancouver-backed candidate for Mayor, there won’t be enough print, enough social media space, and enough online blog and other chatter to carry all the stories of how Mr. Campbell is the developers developer, how he currently has 16 major development projects in Metro Vancouver in the pipeline — most of which projects will come before Vancouver City Council in the next term — and how “conflicted” he would be should he become Vancouver’s next Mayor, on the evening of Saturday, October 22nd.

Squamish Nations Hereditary Chief Ian Campbell ponders what it would be like to be Vancouver MayorSquamish Nations’ Ian Campbell ponders what it would be like to be Vancouver Mayor

In a story published last Friday, written by Vancouver Courier civic affairs columnist and reporter Mike Howell, he wrote that …

(Ian Campbell is) a key negotiator in getting (the Squamish Nation) to work with the Musqueam and Tsleil-Waututh nations to reclaim more than 120 acres of land in Vancouver.

The properties include the 90-acre Jericho lands (the 36-hectare property overlooking Jericho Beach Park) …

Vancouver's 36 hectare Jericho Lands set to be developed over the next 15 years.

Jericho Lands expected to be redeveloped into a residential neighbourhood

… the 21-acre Heather Street lands near Queen Elizabeth Park (ed. note, from The Straight, “which used to be the home of the RCMP headquarters in B.C., previously known as the RCMP Fairmont Lands, the property located north of 37th Avenue, south of 33rd Avenue, by the lanes behind Willow and Ash streets, the draft statement for the Heather Lands proposing a mainly residential development, which include towers ranging in heights from 12 storeys to 24 storeys) …

Massive Heather Lands development, a 21-acre site between West 33rd and 37th avenuesHeather Lands, a 21-acre development site between West 33rd & 37th avenues

Vancouver properties owned by First Nations - Musqueam, Squamish & Tsleil-Waututh - peoples that are set for development over the next four years

… and the 10-acre Liquor Distribution Branch warehouse property on East Broadway, which is co-owned with the Aquilini Investment Group.

Once redeveloped, the value of the properties is estimated to be in the billions of dollars.

The federal government’s commercial property arm, Canada Lands Company, holds an equal interest in the Heather Street lands and 52 acres of the Jericho lands; the remaining 38 acres of Jericho is owned by the bands.

The Squamish Nation has plans to develop land at the foot of the Burrard Bridge.The Squamish Nation plans to develop land at the foot of the Burrard Bridge

The Squamish also fully owns an 11-acre property that runs under the south side of the Burrard Bridge, which is not under the portfolio of the MST Development Corporation but is slated for redevelopment at some point in the future.

In total, Mr. Campbell is the developer of “approximately 160 acres in Metro Vancouver,” over one billion dollars in property that when developed will change the face of Vancouver in ways untold, and perhaps not desirable.

Do The Citizens of Vancouver want Squamish Nations developer Ian Campbell as Mayor?

Do the citizens of Vancouver really want major developer Ian Campbell, the person behind the development of the critical properties to Vancouver’s future identified above, as our city’s next Mayor? Perhaps Mr. Campbell would not find himself conflicted as Mayor, but we have a difficult time believing that would be the case, as would the citizens of Vancouver, we would suggest. In politics it’s all about optics, and the optics here are bad.
Whether you’re on the left or on the right side of the political spectrum, the number one complaint about Vision Vancouver this past 10 years is that they are the developer party, in bed with the developers who have financed their winning campaigns for office — electoral wins that have served the interests of the majority Vision Vancouver party at City Hall, while ill-serving the interests of the average citizen in Vancouver, and ill-serving the crying need for building truly affordable housing in the City of Vancouver.

Would Ian Campbell find himself in perpetual conflict of interest were he to become Vancouver Mayor>” alt=”Would Ian Campbell find himself in perpetual conflict of interest were he to become Vancouver Mayor>” src=”https://www.vanramblings.com/upload/conflict-interest.jpg” border=”1″ width=”520″ height=”269″ class=”mt-image-none” style=”” /></span></p>
<p>While we are loathe to demonize developers, as we have written previously, and as much as we admire Ms. Reimer and Mr. Vdovine, we cannot believe that either is so tone deaf to the concerns of Vancouver citizens across the political spectrum — particularly following the drubbing Vision received at the polls in last year’s October 19th by-election — that both, and other of their Vision colleagues, would promote the candidacy of Squamish Nation Hereditary Chief Ian Campbell, who although he may be a good man, is a resident of North Vancouver, will likely be in for a very rough time at the hands of the media (not to mention, Vancouver’s five other civic parties), and <em><font color=#990000>appears so conflicted</font></em>, and so much the embodiment of what the citizens of Vancouver have <em><font color=#990000>found wanting</font></em> in Vision Vancouver as a civic party of integrity working in the interests of <em><font color=#990000>all</font></em> of the citizens of Vancouver, and very much <em><font color=#990000>the antithesis</font></em> of what the citizens of Vancouver are looking for in a ‘man (or woman) of the people’ Mayor to lead the city forward.</p>
<hr width=

Squamish Nation traditional territory includes the settler community of Vancouver.

Additional note: VanRamblings reader Claudia Ferris writes, ” … if he’s (Ian Campbell) Squamish he is running in his territory,” as clarification and correction of what is written above, that Mr. Campbell is a “North Vancouver resident.”

Activist and community leader Claudia Ferris (2nd from right) standing with Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell — currently running for the Vision Vancouver nomination for Mayor — working together to build a Visitor Information park in Gibsons, on British Columbia's Sunshine Coast.Activist and community leader Claudia Ferris (2nd from right) standing with Squamish Nation hereditary Chief Ian Campbell — currently running for the Vision Vancouver nomination for Mayor — working together to build a Visitor Information park in Gibsons.

Ms. Ferris adds, “One of the reasons I like Ian Campbell is because of the interaction I had with him when I lived in Gibsons. I was on the leadership team of the Gibsons and District Chamber of Commerce when we built a visitor information park. The site is on the Squamish territory and I invited their leadership to the opening. And they came! Chief Campbell and his councillors were very responsive and helpful and it was a pleasant experience to be supported in building a community amenity. We also had singers from the Sechelt Band come out and it felt very inclusive and progressive to be working together. Chief Campbell was a total sweetheart throughout the process.”